Percutaneous microwave ablation of cT1b renal cell carcinoma: safety and oncologic efficacy in a large, single-center elderly and comorbid cohort

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1007/s00261-024-04794-8
Shane A. Wells, Daniel Shapiro, Tudor Borza, Glenn Allen, J. Louis Hinshaw, Timothy J. Ziemlewicz, Christopher L. Brace, Alice M. Semerjian, E. Jason Abel
{"title":"Percutaneous microwave ablation of cT1b renal cell carcinoma: safety and oncologic efficacy in a large, single-center elderly and comorbid cohort","authors":"Shane A. Wells,&nbsp;Daniel Shapiro,&nbsp;Tudor Borza,&nbsp;Glenn Allen,&nbsp;J. Louis Hinshaw,&nbsp;Timothy J. Ziemlewicz,&nbsp;Christopher L. Brace,&nbsp;Alice M. Semerjian,&nbsp;E. Jason Abel","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04794-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate safety and oncologic efficacy of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for treating clinically localized T1b (cT1b) renal cell carcinoma (RCC).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center retrospective study was performed under a waiver of informed consent. Seventy-four consecutive patients (49M/25F) with 76 cT1b RCC (median tumor diameter 4.5 cm) were treated with percutaneous MWA between 5/2012 and 8/2020. Patients were stratified into two groups by technique, depending on whether antennas were repositioned for additional ablation or not. Primary efficacy, complications, and local tumor progression (LTP) were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher’s exact tests. The Kaplan Meier method was used for survival analysis.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients were elderly (median age 69.5), obese (median BMI 34.5), and comorbid (Charlson Comorbidity Index = 4). Most tumors were low-grade (grade 1–2) (67/89, 88%) and clear cell RCC was the most common histology (62/76, 82%). A median of three MWA antennas were powered at 65 W for 7 min for treatment. Renal masses were larger (4.6 vs 4.5 cm, p = 0.01) and procedure times longer (100 min vs 80.5 min, p = 0.04) for the antenna reposition cohort (n = 34, 45%). Primary efficacy and high-grade complication rates were 93% and 8%, respectively. The local tumor progression rate (LTP), at a median follow-up was 28.2 months, was 16%. Primary efficacy, low and high-grade complications, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate and LTP were similar between cohorts (p = 0.20–0.55).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Percutaneous MWA for cT1b RCC is safe in elderly and comorbid patients with acceptable oncologic efficacy. Repeat ablation is well-tolerated and can improve oncologic efficacy.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 8","pages":"3617 - 3627"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-024-04794-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate safety and oncologic efficacy of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for treating clinically localized T1b (cT1b) renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Methods

This single-center retrospective study was performed under a waiver of informed consent. Seventy-four consecutive patients (49M/25F) with 76 cT1b RCC (median tumor diameter 4.5 cm) were treated with percutaneous MWA between 5/2012 and 8/2020. Patients were stratified into two groups by technique, depending on whether antennas were repositioned for additional ablation or not. Primary efficacy, complications, and local tumor progression (LTP) were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher’s exact tests. The Kaplan Meier method was used for survival analysis.

Results

Patients were elderly (median age 69.5), obese (median BMI 34.5), and comorbid (Charlson Comorbidity Index = 4). Most tumors were low-grade (grade 1–2) (67/89, 88%) and clear cell RCC was the most common histology (62/76, 82%). A median of three MWA antennas were powered at 65 W for 7 min for treatment. Renal masses were larger (4.6 vs 4.5 cm, p = 0.01) and procedure times longer (100 min vs 80.5 min, p = 0.04) for the antenna reposition cohort (n = 34, 45%). Primary efficacy and high-grade complication rates were 93% and 8%, respectively. The local tumor progression rate (LTP), at a median follow-up was 28.2 months, was 16%. Primary efficacy, low and high-grade complications, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate and LTP were similar between cohorts (p = 0.20–0.55).

Conclusion

Percutaneous MWA for cT1b RCC is safe in elderly and comorbid patients with acceptable oncologic efficacy. Repeat ablation is well-tolerated and can improve oncologic efficacy.

Graphical Abstract

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮微波消融治疗cT1b肾细胞癌:在大型单中心老年共病队列中的安全性和肿瘤学疗效
目的:评价经皮微波消融(MWA)治疗临床局限性T1b (cT1b)肾细胞癌(RCC)的安全性和肿瘤学疗效。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究是在知情同意弃权的情况下进行的。在2012年5月至2020年8月期间,74例连续患者(49M/25F) 76例cT1b RCC(中位肿瘤直径4.5 cm)接受了经皮MWA治疗。根据技术将患者分为两组,这取决于天线是否重新定位以进行额外的消融。使用Wilcoxon秩和和Fisher精确检验比较主要疗效、并发症和局部肿瘤进展(LTP)。采用Kaplan Meier法进行生存分析。结果:患者为老年(中位年龄69.5)、肥胖(中位BMI 34.5)、共病(Charlson共病指数= 4)。大多数肿瘤为低级别(1-2级)(67/ 89,88%),透明细胞RCC为最常见的组织学(62/ 76,82%)。三个MWA天线的中位数为65 W,持续7分钟用于治疗。天线复位组(n = 34,45 %)的肾肿块更大(4.6 vs 4.5 cm, p = 0.01),手术时间更长(100分钟vs 80.5分钟,p = 0.04)。主要有效率为93%,高度并发症发生率为8%。中位随访28.2个月时,局部肿瘤进展率(LTP)为16%。主要疗效、低级别和高级别并发症、估计肾小球滤过率和LTP的变化在队列之间相似(p = 0.20-0.55)。结论:经皮MWA治疗cT1b RCC对老年及合并症患者是安全的,肿瘤疗效可接受。反复消融耐受性好,可提高肿瘤疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
Navigating the new frontier: growth, integrity, and our vision for 2026 From duodenitis to stricture: Decoding the impact of partial annular pancreas over years A CT-based 2.5D deep learning model for preoperative T-staging in gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study Early and delayed post-cesarean complications: an imaging review 18F-FDG PET-based ensemble deep learning model for the prediction of lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1