Safety and efficacy of low-dose esketamine weakly opioidized anesthesia in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing surgery: a prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY BMC Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1186/s12871-025-02908-3
Ni-Na Hou, Meng-Yun Zhang, Yu-Wei Zhang, Hong-Jing Wu, Hong Luo, Heng Yang
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of low-dose esketamine weakly opioidized anesthesia in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing surgery: a prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ni-Na Hou, Meng-Yun Zhang, Yu-Wei Zhang, Hong-Jing Wu, Hong Luo, Heng Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02908-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The perioperative use of esketamine may reduce opioid use and their adverse effects. We aimed to evaluate the intraoperative safety and efficacy of weak opioidized anesthesia with low-dose esketamine in the treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing total laminectomy with complete decompression and interbody implant fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 90 elderly patients were randomized into three groups: the esketamine HS group (0.2 mg/kg induction, 0.25 mg/(kg·h) infusion), the esketamine LS group (0.2 mg/kg induction, 0.125 mg/(kg·h) infusion), and the control group (group C receiving an equal volume of saline). The primary outcome was the cumulative dose of sufentanil administered during the perioperative period. Pain (VAS rest and movement scores) on preoperative day 1 (POD-1), postoperative day 1 (POD1), postoperative day 3 (POD3), and postoperative day 7 (POD7), and serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) on POD-1, POD1, POD3, and POD7 were the secondary outcomes. We also measured mean arterial pressure and the heart rate of the three groups at each time point before anesthesia (T0), immediately after intubation (T1), 5 min after intubation (T2), at the time of surgical skin incision (T3), at the time of extubation (T4), and 30 min after surgery (T5), intraoperative propofol and remifentanil dosage, and the incidence of adverse reactions within 5 days postoperatively, etc. RESULTS: The cumulative perioperative sufentanil dosage and the number of patients undergoing postoperative PACU remedial analgesia were significantly lower in the HS and LS groups compared to the C group (P < 0.05). Cumulative perioperative sufentanil use was lower in the HS group compared with the LS group (P < 0.01). The VAS dynamic and static pain scores were significantly lower in the HS group at POD1 compared to the C and LS groups. There was no significant difference in VAS dynamic and static pain scores among the three groups at POD3 and POD7 (P > 0.05). At POD1, the VAS dynamic and static pain scores were significantly lower in the HS group compared to the C and LS groups. VAS static pain scores were lower in the LS group at POD1 compared to group C (P < 0.05), whereas VAS dynamic pain scores did not differ compared to group C (P > 0.05). Compared with group C, the serum levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 were significantly lower in the HS and LS groups at POD1, POD3, and POD7. At POD1 and POD3, the serum levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 were lower in the HS group than in the LS group (P < 0.05). Serum IL-10 levels were significantly increased at POD1, POD3, and POD7 in the HS and LS groups compared with group C (P < 0.05). The incidence of intraoperative hypotension was significantly lower in the HS and LS groups compared with group C (P < 0.05). At T2 and T4, the HS and LS groups had significantly lower levels of MAP and HR decline than the C group. At T5, the MAP and HR of the C group were significantly higher than those of the HS and LS groups (P < 0.05). The HR at T3 was reduced in the LS group compared with the C and HS groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative respiratory depression was reduced in the HS and LS groups compared to the C group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of postoperative psychiatric adverse reactions, such as hallucinations, nightmares, diplopia, somnolence, and dizziness (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-dose esketamine is used for its anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects in lumbar spine surgery of elderly patients. It is beneficial to hemodynamic stabilization and can reduce the incidence of postoperative respiratory depression in elderly patients. Among them, 0.2 mg/kg induction and 0.25 mg/(kg-h) infusion were more effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11796069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02908-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The perioperative use of esketamine may reduce opioid use and their adverse effects. We aimed to evaluate the intraoperative safety and efficacy of weak opioidized anesthesia with low-dose esketamine in the treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing total laminectomy with complete decompression and interbody implant fusion.

Methods: In total, 90 elderly patients were randomized into three groups: the esketamine HS group (0.2 mg/kg induction, 0.25 mg/(kg·h) infusion), the esketamine LS group (0.2 mg/kg induction, 0.125 mg/(kg·h) infusion), and the control group (group C receiving an equal volume of saline). The primary outcome was the cumulative dose of sufentanil administered during the perioperative period. Pain (VAS rest and movement scores) on preoperative day 1 (POD-1), postoperative day 1 (POD1), postoperative day 3 (POD3), and postoperative day 7 (POD7), and serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) on POD-1, POD1, POD3, and POD7 were the secondary outcomes. We also measured mean arterial pressure and the heart rate of the three groups at each time point before anesthesia (T0), immediately after intubation (T1), 5 min after intubation (T2), at the time of surgical skin incision (T3), at the time of extubation (T4), and 30 min after surgery (T5), intraoperative propofol and remifentanil dosage, and the incidence of adverse reactions within 5 days postoperatively, etc. RESULTS: The cumulative perioperative sufentanil dosage and the number of patients undergoing postoperative PACU remedial analgesia were significantly lower in the HS and LS groups compared to the C group (P < 0.05). Cumulative perioperative sufentanil use was lower in the HS group compared with the LS group (P < 0.01). The VAS dynamic and static pain scores were significantly lower in the HS group at POD1 compared to the C and LS groups. There was no significant difference in VAS dynamic and static pain scores among the three groups at POD3 and POD7 (P > 0.05). At POD1, the VAS dynamic and static pain scores were significantly lower in the HS group compared to the C and LS groups. VAS static pain scores were lower in the LS group at POD1 compared to group C (P < 0.05), whereas VAS dynamic pain scores did not differ compared to group C (P > 0.05). Compared with group C, the serum levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 were significantly lower in the HS and LS groups at POD1, POD3, and POD7. At POD1 and POD3, the serum levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 were lower in the HS group than in the LS group (P < 0.05). Serum IL-10 levels were significantly increased at POD1, POD3, and POD7 in the HS and LS groups compared with group C (P < 0.05). The incidence of intraoperative hypotension was significantly lower in the HS and LS groups compared with group C (P < 0.05). At T2 and T4, the HS and LS groups had significantly lower levels of MAP and HR decline than the C group. At T5, the MAP and HR of the C group were significantly higher than those of the HS and LS groups (P < 0.05). The HR at T3 was reduced in the LS group compared with the C and HS groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative respiratory depression was reduced in the HS and LS groups compared to the C group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of postoperative psychiatric adverse reactions, such as hallucinations, nightmares, diplopia, somnolence, and dizziness (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Low-dose esketamine is used for its anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects in lumbar spine surgery of elderly patients. It is beneficial to hemodynamic stabilization and can reduce the incidence of postoperative respiratory depression in elderly patients. Among them, 0.2 mg/kg induction and 0.25 mg/(kg-h) infusion were more effective.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低剂量艾氯胺酮弱阿片麻醉在老年腰椎管狭窄手术患者中的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性、双盲随机对照试验。
背景:围手术期使用艾氯胺酮可减少阿片类药物的使用及其不良反应。我们旨在评价低剂量艾氯胺酮弱阿片类麻醉治疗老年腰椎管狭窄患者行全椎板切除术并完全减压椎体间植体融合术的安全性和有效性。方法:90例老年患者随机分为3组:艾氯胺酮HS组(诱导0.2 mg/kg,输注0.25 mg/(kg·h))、艾氯胺酮LS组(诱导0.2 mg/kg,输注0.125 mg/(kg·h))和对照组(C组给予等体积生理盐水)。主要结果是围手术期给予舒芬太尼的累积剂量。术前第1天(POD-1)、术后第1天(POD1)、术后第3天(POD3)和术后第7天(POD7)的疼痛(VAS休息和运动评分),以及POD-1、POD1、POD3和POD7的血清肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α)、白细胞介素-1β (IL-1β)、白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)和白细胞介素-10 (IL-10)水平为次要指标。测量三组患者麻醉前(T0)、插管后立即(T1)、插管后5 min (T2)、手术切开皮肤时(T3)、拔管时(T4)、术后30 min (T5)各时间点的平均动脉压和心率,术中异丙酚和瑞芬太尼用量,以及术后5 d内不良反应发生情况等。结果:HS组和LS组围手术期舒芬太尼累计剂量及PACU术后补救性镇痛患者数均显著低于C组(P < 0.05)。在POD1时,HS组的VAS动态和静态疼痛评分明显低于C和LS组。在POD1时,LS组VAS静态疼痛评分低于C组(P < 0.05)。与C组比较,HS组和LS组在POD1、POD3、POD7时血清TNF-α、IL-1β、IL-6水平均显著降低。在POD1、POD3时,HS组血清TNF-α、IL-1β、IL-6水平均低于LS组(P < 0.05)。结论:小剂量艾氯胺酮在老年腰椎手术中具有良好的抗炎镇痛作用。有利于血流动力学稳定,可减少老年患者术后呼吸抑制的发生。其中0.2 mg/kg诱导和0.25 mg/(kg-h)输注效果较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Parental decision-making for infant spinal anesthesia - a qualitative study. 3D models and simulations training improves TEE performance on pediatric patients with simple valvular congenital heart disease compared to traditional apprenticeship training: a clinical randomized controlled trial. Efficacy of coadministration of calcitonin and hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for unilateral open inguinal hernia repair in tramadol abuse patients: a randomized controlled trial. Platelet hypoaggregation in septic shock: temporal dynamics and association with multiorgan failure-a propensity score-matched cohort study. Oxygenator-related gaseous microemboli and postoperative delirium after on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1