Real-World Effectiveness of Sotrovimab in Ambulatory Patients With COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Large Administrative Claims Database in the United States.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.01.003
Christopher F Bell, Tasneem Lokhandwala, Daniel C Gibbons, Myriam Drysdale, Jane Wang, Emily J Lloyd
{"title":"Real-World Effectiveness of Sotrovimab in Ambulatory Patients With COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Large Administrative Claims Database in the United States.","authors":"Christopher F Bell, Tasneem Lokhandwala, Daniel C Gibbons, Myriam Drysdale, Jane Wang, Emily J Lloyd","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess real-world effectiveness of sotrovimab for reducing severe clinical outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) versus no treatment during the Delta/early Omicron variant periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between May 26, 2021, and April 5, 2022, were identified from US administrative claims data (Komodo Health). Cohorts included early treatment (sotrovimab, other monoclonal antibodies, or antivirals), prophylaxis monoclonal antibody treatment, and untreated for COVID-19. Patient characteristics and severe clinical outcomes (assessed in the 29-day post-treatment period, including hospitalization, mortality, ventilatory support/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO], and hospital length of stay) were described for all cohorts, with comparative effectiveness analysis conducted among matched cohorts of sotrovimab-treated and untreated patients.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In the descriptive analysis (N = 434,766 early treated; N = 2015 prophylaxis treated; N = 4,231,748 untreated), differences in age, comorbidity, and high-risk status were observed. Clinical outcomes occurred at low frequencies in all cohorts. In the effectiveness analysis (N = 34,160 sotrovimab treated; N = 68,320 untreated), treatment with sotrovimab significantly (P < 0.001 for all) reduced hospitalization (4.0% vs 4.7%), hospitalization and/or mortality (4.0% vs 5.2%), ventilatory support and/or ECMO (3.6% vs 6.5%), and length of inpatient stay (4.8 vs 6.2 days) versus no treatment. Stratification by age showed the significant reduction in the likelihood of 29-day all-cause hospitalization was only observed in patients aged >55 years, with greatest benefit observed among patients aged ≥65 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.63). Likelihood of all-cause hospitalization was lower among sotrovimab-treated versus untreated patients during the Delta (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.57-0.76), Omicron BA.1 (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.81-0.95), and BA.2 (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.43-0.79) variant predominant periods.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Sotrovimab was associated with a reduced risk of severe clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 at high risk of progression during the Delta and early Omicron (BA.1 and BA.2) variant periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.01.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess real-world effectiveness of sotrovimab for reducing severe clinical outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) versus no treatment during the Delta/early Omicron variant periods.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between May 26, 2021, and April 5, 2022, were identified from US administrative claims data (Komodo Health). Cohorts included early treatment (sotrovimab, other monoclonal antibodies, or antivirals), prophylaxis monoclonal antibody treatment, and untreated for COVID-19. Patient characteristics and severe clinical outcomes (assessed in the 29-day post-treatment period, including hospitalization, mortality, ventilatory support/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO], and hospital length of stay) were described for all cohorts, with comparative effectiveness analysis conducted among matched cohorts of sotrovimab-treated and untreated patients.

Findings: In the descriptive analysis (N = 434,766 early treated; N = 2015 prophylaxis treated; N = 4,231,748 untreated), differences in age, comorbidity, and high-risk status were observed. Clinical outcomes occurred at low frequencies in all cohorts. In the effectiveness analysis (N = 34,160 sotrovimab treated; N = 68,320 untreated), treatment with sotrovimab significantly (P < 0.001 for all) reduced hospitalization (4.0% vs 4.7%), hospitalization and/or mortality (4.0% vs 5.2%), ventilatory support and/or ECMO (3.6% vs 6.5%), and length of inpatient stay (4.8 vs 6.2 days) versus no treatment. Stratification by age showed the significant reduction in the likelihood of 29-day all-cause hospitalization was only observed in patients aged >55 years, with greatest benefit observed among patients aged ≥65 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.63). Likelihood of all-cause hospitalization was lower among sotrovimab-treated versus untreated patients during the Delta (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.57-0.76), Omicron BA.1 (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.81-0.95), and BA.2 (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.43-0.79) variant predominant periods.

Implications: Sotrovimab was associated with a reduced risk of severe clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 at high risk of progression during the Delta and early Omicron (BA.1 and BA.2) variant periods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Crenessity (crinecerfont). Efficacy and Safety of First-line Targeted Therapies in Physically Fit Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Thalidomide: Following Tragedy, a Repurposed Molecule With Continuing Opportunities for Clinical Benefit. Comparative safety of JAK inhibitors versus TNF or IL-17 inhibitors for cardiovascular disease and cancer in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1