Markus W Scheppach, Robert Mendel, Anna Muzalyova, David Rauber, Andreas Probst, Sandra Nagl, Christoph Römmele, Hon Chi Yip, Louis H S Lau, Stefan K Gölder, Arthur Schmidt, Konstantinos Kouladouros, Mohamed Abdelhafez, Benjamin M Walter, Michael Meinikheim, Philip W Y Chiu, Christoph Palm, Helmut Messmann, Alanna Ebigbo
{"title":"Use of artificial intelligence in submucosal vessel detection during third-space endoscopy.","authors":"Markus W Scheppach, Robert Mendel, Anna Muzalyova, David Rauber, Andreas Probst, Sandra Nagl, Christoph Römmele, Hon Chi Yip, Louis H S Lau, Stefan K Gölder, Arthur Schmidt, Konstantinos Kouladouros, Mohamed Abdelhafez, Benjamin M Walter, Michael Meinikheim, Philip W Y Chiu, Christoph Palm, Helmut Messmann, Alanna Ebigbo","doi":"10.1055/a-2534-1164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While artificial intelligence (AI) shows high potential in decision support for diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy, its role in therapeutic endoscopy remains unclear. Third-space endoscopic procedures pose the risk of intraprocedural bleeding. Therefore, we aimed to develop an AI algorithm for intraprocedural blood vessel detection.Using a test dataset of 101 standardized video clips containing 200 predefined submucosal blood vessels, 19 endoscopists were evaluated for vessel detection rate (VDR) and time (VDT) with and without support of an AI algorithm. Endoscopists were grouped according to experience in endoscopic submucosal dissection.With AI support, endoscopist VDR increased from 56.4% (95%CI CI 54.1-58.6) to 72.4% (95%CI CI 70.3-74.4). Endoscopist VDT dropped from 6.7 seconds (95%CI 6.2-7.1) to 5.2 seconds (95%CI 4.8-5.7). False-positive readings appeared in 4.5% of frames and were marked for a significantly shorter time than true positives (0.7 seconds [95%CI 0.55-0.87] vs. 6.0 seconds [95%CI 5.28-6.70]).AI improved the VDR and VDT of endoscopists during third-space endoscopy. While these data need to be corroborated by clinical trials, AI may prove to be an invaluable tool for improving safety and speed of endoscopic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11516,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":"760-766"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2534-1164","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While artificial intelligence (AI) shows high potential in decision support for diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy, its role in therapeutic endoscopy remains unclear. Third-space endoscopic procedures pose the risk of intraprocedural bleeding. Therefore, we aimed to develop an AI algorithm for intraprocedural blood vessel detection.Using a test dataset of 101 standardized video clips containing 200 predefined submucosal blood vessels, 19 endoscopists were evaluated for vessel detection rate (VDR) and time (VDT) with and without support of an AI algorithm. Endoscopists were grouped according to experience in endoscopic submucosal dissection.With AI support, endoscopist VDR increased from 56.4% (95%CI CI 54.1-58.6) to 72.4% (95%CI CI 70.3-74.4). Endoscopist VDT dropped from 6.7 seconds (95%CI 6.2-7.1) to 5.2 seconds (95%CI 4.8-5.7). False-positive readings appeared in 4.5% of frames and were marked for a significantly shorter time than true positives (0.7 seconds [95%CI 0.55-0.87] vs. 6.0 seconds [95%CI 5.28-6.70]).AI improved the VDR and VDT of endoscopists during third-space endoscopy. While these data need to be corroborated by clinical trials, AI may prove to be an invaluable tool for improving safety and speed of endoscopic interventions.
期刊介绍:
Endoscopy is a leading journal covering the latest technologies and global advancements in gastrointestinal endoscopy. With guidance from an international editorial board, it delivers high-quality content catering to the needs of endoscopists, surgeons, clinicians, and researchers worldwide. Publishing 12 issues each year, Endoscopy offers top-quality review articles, original contributions, prospective studies, surveys of diagnostic and therapeutic advances, and comprehensive coverage of key national and international meetings. Additionally, articles often include supplementary online video content.