Predicting prognosis using stroke-heart indicator: brain natriuretic peptide in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1510235
Jionghao Xue, Fa Lin, Minghao Liu, Wenxiong Song, Runting Li, Yu Chen, Jun Yang, Heze Han, Yitong Jia, Xiaolin Chen, Rong Wang, Yuanli Zhao
{"title":"Predicting prognosis using stroke-heart indicator: brain natriuretic peptide in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.","authors":"Jionghao Xue, Fa Lin, Minghao Liu, Wenxiong Song, Runting Li, Yu Chen, Jun Yang, Heze Han, Yitong Jia, Xiaolin Chen, Rong Wang, Yuanli Zhao","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2025.1510235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore the correlation between brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and prognosis in patients suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) at Beijing Tiantan Hospital between January 2015 and September 2021. Plasma BNP levels were measured upon admission and log-transformed to reduce skewness. Elevated BNP was defined as lgBNP ≥1.79 (equivalent to BNP ≥62 pg./mL). The primary outcome was poor prognosis, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥ 3 at 90 days. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between BNP levels and prognosis. Additionally, we assessed the potential impact of incorporating BNP into a predictive model for poor prognosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The statistical analysis encompassed a total of 932 patients. Among them, 171 individuals experienced unfavorable prognosis (mRS ≥3) during follow-up, and 444 patients had elevated BNP levels, defined as lgBNP ≥1.79. After accounting for confounding factors, elevated BNP levels remained a significant independent risk factor of a poor prognosis (<i>p</i> = 0.047, OR = 1.49, 95%CI = 1.01-2.20). Nevertheless, BNP's predictive value alone might not warrant its inclusion in a prognostic model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated BNP levels independently forecast unfavorable prognosis in patients with aSAH, even though the cutoff value is lower than the cardiology standards. Continuous monitoring and personalized hospitalization plans can be vital for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1510235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1510235","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to explore the correlation between brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and prognosis in patients suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).

Methods: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) at Beijing Tiantan Hospital between January 2015 and September 2021. Plasma BNP levels were measured upon admission and log-transformed to reduce skewness. Elevated BNP was defined as lgBNP ≥1.79 (equivalent to BNP ≥62 pg./mL). The primary outcome was poor prognosis, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥ 3 at 90 days. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between BNP levels and prognosis. Additionally, we assessed the potential impact of incorporating BNP into a predictive model for poor prognosis.

Results: The statistical analysis encompassed a total of 932 patients. Among them, 171 individuals experienced unfavorable prognosis (mRS ≥3) during follow-up, and 444 patients had elevated BNP levels, defined as lgBNP ≥1.79. After accounting for confounding factors, elevated BNP levels remained a significant independent risk factor of a poor prognosis (p = 0.047, OR = 1.49, 95%CI = 1.01-2.20). Nevertheless, BNP's predictive value alone might not warrant its inclusion in a prognostic model.

Conclusion: Elevated BNP levels independently forecast unfavorable prognosis in patients with aSAH, even though the cutoff value is lower than the cardiology standards. Continuous monitoring and personalized hospitalization plans can be vital for these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
期刊最新文献
Association between migraine severity and sleep quality: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Association of systemic inflammatory response index and stroke: a cross-sectional study of NHANES, 2005-2018. Identifying the predictors of ultra early neurological improvement and its role in functional outcome after endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Linear association between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and postoperative delirium after general anesthesia: a cross-sectional study. Successful treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis with telitacicept: a Chinese case series and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1