Relative Fat Mass and Physical Indices as Predictors of Gallstone Formation: Insights From Machine Learning and Logistic Regression.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S507013
Laifu Deng, Shuting Wang, Daiwei Wan, Qi Zhang, Wei Shen, Xiao Liu, Yu Zhang
{"title":"Relative Fat Mass and Physical Indices as Predictors of Gallstone Formation: Insights From Machine Learning and Logistic Regression.","authors":"Laifu Deng, Shuting Wang, Daiwei Wan, Qi Zhang, Wei Shen, Xiao Liu, Yu Zhang","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S507013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Gallstones (GS), a prevalent disorder of the biliary tract, markedly impair patients' quality of life. This study aims to construct predictive models employing diverse machine learning algorithms to elucidate risk factors linked to gallstone formation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study integrated data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with a cohort of 7868 participants from Wuxi People's Hospital and Wuxi Second People's Hospital, including 830 individuals diagnosed with gallstones. To develop our predictive model, we employed four algorithms-Logistic Regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The models were validated internally through k-fold cross-validation and externally using independent datasets. Furthermore, we substantiated the link between relative fat mass (RFM) and gallstone formation by employing four logistic regression models, conducting subgroup analyses, and applying restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The logistic regression algorithm demonstrated superior predictive capability for all risk factors associated with gallstone occurrence compared to other machine learning models. SHAP analysis identified RFM, weight-to-waist index (WWI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), and body mass index (BMI) as prominent predictors of gallstone occurrence, with RFM emerging as the primary determinant. A fully adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a robust positive association between RFM and gallstones. Subgroup analysis further indicated that subgroup factors did not alter the positive relationship between RFM and gallstone prevalence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among the four algorithmic models, logistic regression proved most effective in predicting gallstone occurrence. The model developed in this study offers clinicians a valuable tool for identifying critical prognostic factors, facilitating personalized patient monitoring and tailored management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"509-527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794386/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S507013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Gallstones (GS), a prevalent disorder of the biliary tract, markedly impair patients' quality of life. This study aims to construct predictive models employing diverse machine learning algorithms to elucidate risk factors linked to gallstone formation.

Patients and methods: This study integrated data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with a cohort of 7868 participants from Wuxi People's Hospital and Wuxi Second People's Hospital, including 830 individuals diagnosed with gallstones. To develop our predictive model, we employed four algorithms-Logistic Regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The models were validated internally through k-fold cross-validation and externally using independent datasets. Furthermore, we substantiated the link between relative fat mass (RFM) and gallstone formation by employing four logistic regression models, conducting subgroup analyses, and applying restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves.

Results: The logistic regression algorithm demonstrated superior predictive capability for all risk factors associated with gallstone occurrence compared to other machine learning models. SHAP analysis identified RFM, weight-to-waist index (WWI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), and body mass index (BMI) as prominent predictors of gallstone occurrence, with RFM emerging as the primary determinant. A fully adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a robust positive association between RFM and gallstones. Subgroup analysis further indicated that subgroup factors did not alter the positive relationship between RFM and gallstone prevalence.

Conclusion: Among the four algorithmic models, logistic regression proved most effective in predicting gallstone occurrence. The model developed in this study offers clinicians a valuable tool for identifying critical prognostic factors, facilitating personalized patient monitoring and tailored management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相对脂肪质量和物理指标作为胆结石形成的预测因子:来自机器学习和逻辑回归的见解。
目的:胆结石(GS)是一种常见的胆道疾病,严重影响患者的生活质量。本研究旨在利用不同的机器学习算法构建预测模型,以阐明与胆结石形成相关的风险因素。患者和方法:本研究整合了来自无锡市人民医院和无锡市第二人民医院的全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据,共有7868名参与者,其中包括830名诊断为胆结石的患者。为了建立我们的预测模型,我们使用了四种算法-逻辑回归,高斯朴素贝叶斯(GNB),多层感知器(MLP)和支持向量机(SVM)。模型内部通过k-fold交叉验证,外部使用独立数据集进行验证。此外,我们通过采用四种逻辑回归模型、进行亚群分析和应用限制性三次样条(RCS)曲线证实了相对脂肪量(RFM)与胆结石形成之间的联系。结果:与其他机器学习模型相比,逻辑回归算法对与胆结石发生相关的所有风险因素显示出优越的预测能力。SHAP分析发现,RFM、体重与腰围指数(WWI)、腰围(WC)、腰高比(WHtR)和体重指数(BMI)是胆结石发生的重要预测因素,其中RFM是主要决定因素。一项完全调整的多变量logistic回归分析显示RFM和胆结石之间存在显著的正相关。亚组分析进一步表明,亚组因素并未改变RFM与胆结石患病率之间的正相关关系。结论:在四种算法模型中,logistic回归预测胆结石发生最有效。本研究开发的模型为临床医生提供了一个有价值的工具,用于识别关键的预后因素,促进患者的个性化监测和量身定制的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
Difference in Clinical Features and Risk Factors of Ischemic Stroke Between Young and Elderly Adults: A Retrospective Observation from an Island Population. Immunological and Inflammatory Characteristics of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions: A Retrospective Study. Non-HDL/HDL Cholesterol Ratio as a Protective Factor for Functional Recovery Following Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Prospective Cohort Study. Establishment of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Reference Range for Healthy Adult Men Not Using Vitamin D Supplements in Alqurayyat, Saudi Arabia. The New Era of Precision Oncology. Practicing Pathology in Low Resource Countries and Settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1