Are clinical, psychophysical, or psychological variables helpful for discriminating patients with tension type headache? A diagnostic accuracy study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnaf009
Margarita Cigarán-Mendez, Juan C Pacho-Hernández, Angela Tejera-Alonso, Francisco G Fernández-Palacios, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero, Cristina Gómez, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas
{"title":"Are clinical, psychophysical, or psychological variables helpful for discriminating patients with tension type headache? A diagnostic accuracy study.","authors":"Margarita Cigarán-Mendez, Juan C Pacho-Hernández, Angela Tejera-Alonso, Francisco G Fernández-Palacios, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero, Cristina Gómez, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Diagnosis of tension-type headache (TTH) is a challengue for clinicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the ability of pain thresholds to differentiate between subjects with and without TTH; and (2) to determine the capability of clinical, psychological and psychophysical variables to differentiate between individuals with frequent episodic (FETTH) or chronic (CTTH) tension-type headache.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A diagnostic accuracy study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An urban hospital in Madrid (Spain).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred (n = 100) individuals with TTH and 50 comparable non-headache subjects.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Pressure pain threshold (PPTs) over the temporalis muscle, cervical spine, second metacarpal, and tibialis anterior muscle and dynamic pain thresholds (DPT) were bilaterally assessed. Clinical headache parameters (headache diary), headache-associated burden (HDI), anxiety and depressive levels (HADS), sleep quality (PSQI), and state (STAI-S)-trait (STAI-T) anxiety levels were also evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, optimal cut-off point, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR) for each variable were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with TTH exhibited lower PPTs and DPT than those without TTH. No significant differences in PPTs and DPT were found between FETTH and CTTH individuals. Overall, no clinical, psychological or psychophysical variable exhibited an acceptable ROC value (≥0.7) for identifying between TTH patients and non-headache controls or between subjects with FETTH and CTTH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although individuals with TTH exhibit widespread pressure pain hyperalgesia, neither clinical nor psychological nor psychophysical variable had proper diagnostic accuracy to discriminate between individuals with/without TTH or between those with FETTH and CTTH.</p><p><strong>Relevance: </strong>Pressure pain thresholds should not be used at this stage as diagnostic tool for TTH. Further studies should clarify the clinical relevance of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"321-328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Diagnosis of tension-type headache (TTH) is a challengue for clinicians.

Objective: The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the ability of pain thresholds to differentiate between subjects with and without TTH; and (2) to determine the capability of clinical, psychological and psychophysical variables to differentiate between individuals with frequent episodic (FETTH) or chronic (CTTH) tension-type headache.

Design: A diagnostic accuracy study.

Setting: An urban hospital in Madrid (Spain).

Participants: One hundred (n = 100) individuals with TTH and 50 comparable non-headache subjects.

Main outcomes: Pressure pain threshold (PPTs) over the temporalis muscle, cervical spine, second metacarpal, and tibialis anterior muscle and dynamic pain thresholds (DPT) were bilaterally assessed. Clinical headache parameters (headache diary), headache-associated burden (HDI), anxiety and depressive levels (HADS), sleep quality (PSQI), and state (STAI-S)-trait (STAI-T) anxiety levels were also evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, optimal cut-off point, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR) for each variable were calculated.

Results: Individuals with TTH exhibited lower PPTs and DPT than those without TTH. No significant differences in PPTs and DPT were found between FETTH and CTTH individuals. Overall, no clinical, psychological or psychophysical variable exhibited an acceptable ROC value (≥0.7) for identifying between TTH patients and non-headache controls or between subjects with FETTH and CTTH.

Conclusion: Although individuals with TTH exhibit widespread pressure pain hyperalgesia, neither clinical nor psychological nor psychophysical variable had proper diagnostic accuracy to discriminate between individuals with/without TTH or between those with FETTH and CTTH.

Relevance: Pressure pain thresholds should not be used at this stage as diagnostic tool for TTH. Further studies should clarify the clinical relevance of these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床、心理或心理变量对判别紧张性头痛有帮助吗?诊断准确性研究。
目的:本研究的目的是:1,确定疼痛阈值区分有和没有紧张性头痛(TTH)的受试者的能力;2、确定临床、心理和心理物理变量区分频繁发作性(FETTH)或慢性(CTTH)紧张性头痛个体的能力。方法:进行诊断准确性研究。对100名TTH患者和50名非头痛患者进行双侧压力疼痛阈值(PPTs)和动态疼痛阈值(DPT)评估,包括颞肌、颈椎、第二掌骨和胫骨前肌。临床头痛参数(头痛日记)、头痛相关负担(HDI)、焦虑和抑郁水平(HADS)、睡眠质量(PSQI)和状态(STAI-S) -特质(STAI-T)焦虑水平也进行了评估。计算每个变量的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积、最佳截止点、敏感性、特异性和正、负似然比(LR)。结果:有TTH者的PPTs和DPT均低于无TTH者。在FETTH和CTTH个体之间,PPTs和DPT没有显著差异。总体而言,没有临床、心理或心理物理变量显示出可接受的ROC值(≥0.7)来区分TTH患者和非头痛对照组之间,以及FETTH和CTTH受试者之间。结论:尽管TTH患者表现出广泛的压迫性痛觉过敏,但无论是临床、心理还是心理物理变量,都不能准确地诊断出TTH患者和非TTH患者,以及FETTH和CTTH患者。进一步的研究应阐明这些发现的临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
期刊最新文献
Scrambler Therapy (delivered via the Calmare® device) in Refractory CRPS in an Adolescent: A Practical Solution to a Complex Clinical Problem (Resident & Fellow Forum). Response to LTE: CMS Proposed Restrictions on Peripheral Nerve Blocks and Procedures for Chronic Pain: Clinical, Ethical, and Policy Implications for Millions of Americans. Letter to the Editor: In response to Singla et al. Improving the Contextual use of GRADE for Interventional Pain Procedures: Bridging Evidence Certainty and Clinical Reality. Anatomical Clarification of Superficial and Deep Lumbar ESP Injections Based on the Erector Spinae Fascial Boundary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1