Knee malalignment and laterality influence 2-year meniscus tear repair outcomes: A pilot study.

IF 3.3 2区医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1002/ksa.12602

Benjamin Tschopp, Patrick Omoumi, John Nyland, Aziz Chaouch, Valentine Schneebeli, Roland Jakob, Robin Martin

{"title":"Knee malalignment and laterality influence 2-year meniscus tear repair outcomes: A pilot study.","authors":"Benjamin Tschopp, Patrick Omoumi, John Nyland, Aziz Chaouch, Valentine Schneebeli, Roland Jakob, Robin Martin","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To analyse biomechanical determinants for radiological and clinical outcomes of posterior horn longitudinal vertical meniscal tear (LVMT) repairs.Methods: Patients undergoing primary repair of vascular zone traumatic full-thickness posterior horn LVMT were enroled. We hypothesized four potential factors would influence mid-term outcomes: malalignment (varus/valgus ≥5° for medial/lateral tears), meniscal laterality (medial vs. lateral), concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and cartilage damage (Outerbridge grade ≥ II). The primary outcome was posterior horn nonhealing rate 6 months postoperatively (T1), evaluated using computed tomography arthrography (CTA) and Henning's criteria. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) assessed at T1 and ≥24 months postoperatively (T2). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models estimated the marginal relative risk (MRR) of nonhealing for each determinant, while fractional logit regression assessed determinants' impact on PROMs at T1 and T2.Results: Seventy-eight patients (median age 29 years, interquartile range [IQR]: [21-37]); 76% male), were followed for ≥2 years (median 2.5 years, IQR: [2.1-3.6]). LVMTs extended to the middle horn in 81% and to the anterior horn in 52%. Posterior horn nonhealing rates (53%) were higher than in the middle (35%, p = 0.013) and anterior horn (7%, p < 0.001). Malalignment was present in 14%, medial meniscal involvement in 77%, ACLR in 55% and cartilage damage in 37%. Malalignment (MRR = 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.84, 2.09]) and medial laterality (MRR = 1.7, 95% CI: [0.93, 3.6]) were independently identified as potential nonhealing risk factors. But it is the combination of varus malalignment and medial laterality that significantly increased the risk of nonhealing (MRR = 2.54, 95% CI: [1.09, 6.01], p = 0.033) and negatively impacted all Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at T1 and/or T2.Conclusion: Combined varus malalignment and medial meniscus involvement strongly predicted repair nonhealing and poorer outcomes after posterior horn LVMT repair.Study design: Prospective cohort pilot study.Level of evidence: Level III.","PeriodicalId":17880,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12602","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To analyse biomechanical determinants for radiological and clinical outcomes of posterior horn longitudinal vertical meniscal tear (LVMT) repairs.

Methods: Patients undergoing primary repair of vascular zone traumatic full-thickness posterior horn LVMT were enroled. We hypothesized four potential factors would influence mid-term outcomes: malalignment (varus/valgus ≥5° for medial/lateral tears), meniscal laterality (medial vs. lateral), concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and cartilage damage (Outerbridge grade ≥ II). The primary outcome was posterior horn nonhealing rate 6 months postoperatively (T1), evaluated using computed tomography arthrography (CTA) and Henning's criteria. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) assessed at T1 and ≥24 months postoperatively (T2). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models estimated the marginal relative risk (MRR) of nonhealing for each determinant, while fractional logit regression assessed determinants' impact on PROMs at T1 and T2.

Results: Seventy-eight patients (median age 29 years, interquartile range [IQR]: [21-37]); 76% male), were followed for ≥2 years (median 2.5 years, IQR: [2.1-3.6]). LVMTs extended to the middle horn in 81% and to the anterior horn in 52%. Posterior horn nonhealing rates (53%) were higher than in the middle (35%, p = 0.013) and anterior horn (7%, p < 0.001). Malalignment was present in 14%, medial meniscal involvement in 77%, ACLR in 55% and cartilage damage in 37%. Malalignment (MRR = 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.84, 2.09]) and medial laterality (MRR = 1.7, 95% CI: [0.93, 3.6]) were independently identified as potential nonhealing risk factors. But it is the combination of varus malalignment and medial laterality that significantly increased the risk of nonhealing (MRR = 2.54, 95% CI: [1.09, 6.01], p = 0.033) and negatively impacted all Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at T1 and/or T2.

Conclusion: Combined varus malalignment and medial meniscus involvement strongly predicted repair nonhealing and poorer outcomes after posterior horn LVMT repair.

Study design: Prospective cohort pilot study.

Level of evidence: Level III.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 医学-外科

CiteScore

8.10

自引率

18.40%

发文量

418

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Few other areas of orthopedic surgery and traumatology have undergone such a dramatic evolution in the last 10 years as knee surgery, arthroscopy and sports traumatology. Ranked among the top 33% of journals in both Orthopedics and Sports Sciences, the goal of this European journal is to publish papers about innovative knee surgery, sports trauma surgery and arthroscopy. Each issue features a series of peer-reviewed articles that deal with diagnosis and management and with basic research. Each issue also contains at least one review article about an important clinical problem. Case presentations or short notes about technical innovations are also accepted for publication. The articles cover all aspects of knee surgery and all types of sports trauma; in addition, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, and all types of arthroscopy (not only the knee but also the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, ankle, etc.) are addressed. Articles on new diagnostic techniques such as MRI and ultrasound and high-quality articles about the biomechanics of joints, muscles and tendons are included. Although this is largely a clinical journal, it is also open to basic research with clinical relevance. Because the journal is supported by a distinguished European Editorial Board, assisted by an international Advisory Board, you can be assured that the journal maintains the highest standards. Official Clinical Journal of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA).