Performance of Shock Index as a predictor of severe postpartum hemorrhage following cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Minerva anestesiologica Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18468-4
Valentina DE Giorgis, Myriam Brebion, Lauranne Ossé, Xavier Repessé, Ann-Marie Crowe, Gilles Orliaguet, Hawa Keita
{"title":"Performance of Shock Index as a predictor of severe postpartum hemorrhage following cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Valentina DE Giorgis, Myriam Brebion, Lauranne Ossé, Xavier Repessé, Ann-Marie Crowe, Gilles Orliaguet, Hawa Keita","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18468-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An early diagnosis of a postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) can be challenging. The Shock Index (SI), the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure, appears to be a useful indicator for the early diagnosis of severe PPH after vaginal delivery. Our primary aim was to evaluate if the SI has a predictive value for severe PPH following cesarean section (C-section) under spinal anesthesia (SA) and its best predictive threshold.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective single-center trial including women scheduled for C-section under SA with prevention of maternal hypotension by phenylephrine, and complicated by PPH between 2019 and 2021. Women were divided into two groups: non-severe PPH (blood loss <1000 mL) versus severe PPH (blood loss ≥1000 mL). SI was calculated and compared between the groups at four different time points: T0: prior to C-section; T1: at incision; T2: 15 minutes from start of PPH; T3: end of PPH management. Using receiver operating characteristic curve, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) and the best diagnostic threshold (sensitivity and specificity) for predicting severe PPH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 129 patients were included, 26 (20.2%) with severe PPH. Median SI was significantly higher at T2 in the severe PPH group (1.14 (1.10-1.25) versus 1.0 (0.85-1.10), P<0.001), but not at other times of management. An SI value of ≥1.17 was the best threshold with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.90), a sensitivity of 0.42 and a specificity of 0.88.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SI may be an early indicator of severe PPH during C-section under SA.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18468-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An early diagnosis of a postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) can be challenging. The Shock Index (SI), the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure, appears to be a useful indicator for the early diagnosis of severe PPH after vaginal delivery. Our primary aim was to evaluate if the SI has a predictive value for severe PPH following cesarean section (C-section) under spinal anesthesia (SA) and its best predictive threshold.

Methods: Retrospective single-center trial including women scheduled for C-section under SA with prevention of maternal hypotension by phenylephrine, and complicated by PPH between 2019 and 2021. Women were divided into two groups: non-severe PPH (blood loss <1000 mL) versus severe PPH (blood loss ≥1000 mL). SI was calculated and compared between the groups at four different time points: T0: prior to C-section; T1: at incision; T2: 15 minutes from start of PPH; T3: end of PPH management. Using receiver operating characteristic curve, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) and the best diagnostic threshold (sensitivity and specificity) for predicting severe PPH.

Results: Overall, 129 patients were included, 26 (20.2%) with severe PPH. Median SI was significantly higher at T2 in the severe PPH group (1.14 (1.10-1.25) versus 1.0 (0.85-1.10), P<0.001), but not at other times of management. An SI value of ≥1.17 was the best threshold with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.90), a sensitivity of 0.42 and a specificity of 0.88.

Conclusions: SI may be an early indicator of severe PPH during C-section under SA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
期刊最新文献
A fascial compartment plus "cup-shaped" blocks provide surgical anesthesia for the excision of a huge mass at the posterior cervico-occipital region. Ultrasound-guided ulnar versus radial artery cannulation in children undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Quadro-iliac plane block in inguinal hernia surgery. Ultrasound-guided serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block for unilateral dorsal thoracic myofascial pain. Why do ERAS?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1