Evaluating post-treatment residual intracranial arteriovenous shunting: a comparison of arterial spin labeling MRI and digital subtraction angiography.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1007/s00234-025-03548-7
Abraham Noorbakhsh, Mitchell T Wong, Divya S Bolar
{"title":"Evaluating post-treatment residual intracranial arteriovenous shunting: a comparison of arterial spin labeling MRI and digital subtraction angiography.","authors":"Abraham Noorbakhsh, Mitchell T Wong, Divya S Bolar","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03548-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI in detecting residual arteriovenous (AV) shunting in treated arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and fistulas (AVFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective institutional review identified 29 patients with DSA-confirmed AV shunt lesions treated via embolization (n = 17), stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 2), surgical resection (n = 8), or combined embolization and surgical resection (n = 4), with corresponding baseline and post-treatment ASL and DSA studies. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed ASL images for residual AV shunting, with inter-rater agreement calculated. Disagreements were jointly reviewed to reach consensus. Sensitivity and specificity for using ASL to detect residual AV shunting were then determined using DSA as the gold standard reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen patients with Spetzler-Martin grades II-V AVMs were included: 76.5% with supratentorial nidus, and 52.9% with prior hemorrhage. Twelve AVF patients were included, including eight dural, one vein of Galen, two perimedullary, and one cavernous-carotid fistula. Inter-rater agreement for presence of residual AV shunting was strong (93.5%, κ = 0.87). Two disagreements involved AVM patients after surgical resection. Sensitivity and specificity of ASL for detecting residual was 94% and 93%, respectively. Within the AVM group, both metrics reached 100%, while for AVFs, they both decreased to 83%, with one false positive and one false negative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASL MRI is highly sensitive and specific for detection of residual AV shunting across a wide spectrum of AV shunt pathologies and treatment modalities. ASL can play an important role as a non-invasive adjunct to DSA, potentially reducing the frequency of DSA during the continuum of post-treatment care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"1233-1250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03548-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI in detecting residual arteriovenous (AV) shunting in treated arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and fistulas (AVFs).

Methods: A retrospective institutional review identified 29 patients with DSA-confirmed AV shunt lesions treated via embolization (n = 17), stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 2), surgical resection (n = 8), or combined embolization and surgical resection (n = 4), with corresponding baseline and post-treatment ASL and DSA studies. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed ASL images for residual AV shunting, with inter-rater agreement calculated. Disagreements were jointly reviewed to reach consensus. Sensitivity and specificity for using ASL to detect residual AV shunting were then determined using DSA as the gold standard reference.

Results: Seventeen patients with Spetzler-Martin grades II-V AVMs were included: 76.5% with supratentorial nidus, and 52.9% with prior hemorrhage. Twelve AVF patients were included, including eight dural, one vein of Galen, two perimedullary, and one cavernous-carotid fistula. Inter-rater agreement for presence of residual AV shunting was strong (93.5%, κ = 0.87). Two disagreements involved AVM patients after surgical resection. Sensitivity and specificity of ASL for detecting residual was 94% and 93%, respectively. Within the AVM group, both metrics reached 100%, while for AVFs, they both decreased to 83%, with one false positive and one false negative.

Conclusion: ASL MRI is highly sensitive and specific for detection of residual AV shunting across a wide spectrum of AV shunt pathologies and treatment modalities. ASL can play an important role as a non-invasive adjunct to DSA, potentially reducing the frequency of DSA during the continuum of post-treatment care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估治疗后残余颅内动静脉分流:动脉自旋标记MRI和数字减影血管造影的比较。
目的:评价动脉自旋标记(ASL) MRI检测动静脉畸形(AVMs)和瘘管(AVFs)术后残留动静脉(AV)分流的效果。方法:对29例经DSA证实的房室分流病变患者进行回顾性机构回顾,分别通过栓塞(n = 17)、立体定向放射手术(n = 2)、手术切除(n = 8)或栓塞和手术联合切除(n = 4)进行治疗,并进行相应的基线和治疗后ASL和DSA研究。两名神经放射学家独立评估ASL图像是否存在残留的房室分流,并计算出评分间的一致性。共同审议分歧,达成共识。然后以DSA作为金标准参比,确定ASL检测残留房室分流的敏感性和特异性。结果:17例Spetzler-Martin II-V级AVMs患者:76.5%患者有幕上病灶,52.9%患者既往有出血。纳入12例AVF患者,包括8例硬脑膜瘘、1例盖伦静脉瘘、2例髓周瘘和1例海绵状颈动脉瘘。对残留房室分流存在的评分一致性很强(93.5%,κ = 0.87)。有两个分歧涉及手术切除后的AVM患者。ASL检测残留的灵敏度和特异性分别为94%和93%。在AVM组中,这两个指标都达到100%,而对于avf,这两个指标都下降到83%,其中一个假阳性和一个假阴性。结论:ASL MRI对各种室间隔分流病变和治疗方式的残留室间隔分流检测具有高度敏感性和特异性。ASL可以作为DSA的非侵入性辅助手段发挥重要作用,在治疗后护理的连续过程中可能降低DSA的频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
期刊最新文献
Neuroimaging-clinical phenotypes are associated with functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: a latent class analysis of multidimensional biomarkers. The value of non-contrast and contrast-enhanced time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up assessment of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter stents. Association of concomitant subaxial cervical spine injury with imaging-based spinal cord injury and impaired consciousness in upper cervical spine trauma. New MRI findings of late delayed radiation injuries in long-term survivors after radiotherapy: punctate enhancing dot-, oval-, or rod-like lesions. Noninvasive MRI biomarkers in diabetic neuropathy: correlation with electrophysiology, clinical scores, and nerve pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1