Evaluating post-treatment residual intracranial arteriovenous shunting: a comparison of arterial spin labeling MRI and digital subtraction angiography.
Abraham Noorbakhsh, Mitchell T Wong, Divya S Bolar
{"title":"Evaluating post-treatment residual intracranial arteriovenous shunting: a comparison of arterial spin labeling MRI and digital subtraction angiography.","authors":"Abraham Noorbakhsh, Mitchell T Wong, Divya S Bolar","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03548-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI in detecting residual arteriovenous (AV) shunting in treated arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and fistulas (AVFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective institutional review identified 29 patients with DSA-confirmed AV shunt lesions treated via embolization (n = 17), stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 2), surgical resection (n = 8), or combined embolization and surgical resection (n = 4), with corresponding baseline and post-treatment ASL and DSA studies. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed ASL images for residual AV shunting, with inter-rater agreement calculated. Disagreements were jointly reviewed to reach consensus. Sensitivity and specificity for using ASL to detect residual AV shunting were then determined using DSA as the gold standard reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen patients with Spetzler-Martin grades II-V AVMs were included: 76.5% with supratentorial nidus, and 52.9% with prior hemorrhage. Twelve AVF patients were included, including eight dural, one vein of Galen, two perimedullary, and one cavernous-carotid fistula. Inter-rater agreement for presence of residual AV shunting was strong (93.5%, κ = 0.87). Two disagreements involved AVM patients after surgical resection. Sensitivity and specificity of ASL for detecting residual was 94% and 93%, respectively. Within the AVM group, both metrics reached 100%, while for AVFs, they both decreased to 83%, with one false positive and one false negative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASL MRI is highly sensitive and specific for detection of residual AV shunting across a wide spectrum of AV shunt pathologies and treatment modalities. ASL can play an important role as a non-invasive adjunct to DSA, potentially reducing the frequency of DSA during the continuum of post-treatment care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03548-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI in detecting residual arteriovenous (AV) shunting in treated arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and fistulas (AVFs).
Methods: A retrospective institutional review identified 29 patients with DSA-confirmed AV shunt lesions treated via embolization (n = 17), stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 2), surgical resection (n = 8), or combined embolization and surgical resection (n = 4), with corresponding baseline and post-treatment ASL and DSA studies. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed ASL images for residual AV shunting, with inter-rater agreement calculated. Disagreements were jointly reviewed to reach consensus. Sensitivity and specificity for using ASL to detect residual AV shunting were then determined using DSA as the gold standard reference.
Results: Seventeen patients with Spetzler-Martin grades II-V AVMs were included: 76.5% with supratentorial nidus, and 52.9% with prior hemorrhage. Twelve AVF patients were included, including eight dural, one vein of Galen, two perimedullary, and one cavernous-carotid fistula. Inter-rater agreement for presence of residual AV shunting was strong (93.5%, κ = 0.87). Two disagreements involved AVM patients after surgical resection. Sensitivity and specificity of ASL for detecting residual was 94% and 93%, respectively. Within the AVM group, both metrics reached 100%, while for AVFs, they both decreased to 83%, with one false positive and one false negative.
Conclusion: ASL MRI is highly sensitive and specific for detection of residual AV shunting across a wide spectrum of AV shunt pathologies and treatment modalities. ASL can play an important role as a non-invasive adjunct to DSA, potentially reducing the frequency of DSA during the continuum of post-treatment care.
期刊介绍:
Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.