An in silico simulation of the frequency of administering HLA-incompatible low titer group O whole blood units when the donor pool includes unscreened female donors.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1111/trf.18141
Mark H Yazer, Samantha Ngamsuntikul, Manish Gandhi, Torunn Apelseth, Audra Taylor, Jansen N Seheult
{"title":"An in silico simulation of the frequency of administering HLA-incompatible low titer group O whole blood units when the donor pool includes unscreened female donors.","authors":"Mark H Yazer, Samantha Ngamsuntikul, Manish Gandhi, Torunn Apelseth, Audra Taylor, Jansen N Seheult","doi":"10.1111/trf.18141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) increases in popularity, blood centers are finding innovative ways of maintaining the supply. One potential way is collecting LTOWB from parous female donors without testing for HLA antibodies. This in silico simulation predicted the risk of an LTOWB unit containing an HLA antibody and the subsequent risk for an HLA-incompatible transfusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An LTOWB blood bank with 1 million units was simulated consisting of male, nulliparous, and parous female donors. The proportion of each donor type was modeled after the sex distribution at US blood centers. The parity of female donors was calculated based on the average number of live births per female depending on her age. HLA-alloimmunization risk was determined by her parity status. The HLA haplotypes of the simulated recipients were derived from the 100 most common HLA haplotypes in the US National Marrow Registry Program database. The proportion of different race/ethnic groups in the US was used to simulate 100,000 LTOWB recipients to whom between 1 and 10 units were administered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the risk of an LTOWB unit containing at least one HLA antibody was 12.2% and the rate of receiving an HLA-incompatible unit was 21.3%. The risk of receiving an HLA-incompatible unit rose from 4.8% after receipt of one unit to 36.5% after 10 units.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blood collectors and hospitals should evaluate the potential TRALI risk against the benefit of a potentially expanded inventory of LTOWB before collecting plasma-containing products from non-HLA-tested parous female donors.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) increases in popularity, blood centers are finding innovative ways of maintaining the supply. One potential way is collecting LTOWB from parous female donors without testing for HLA antibodies. This in silico simulation predicted the risk of an LTOWB unit containing an HLA antibody and the subsequent risk for an HLA-incompatible transfusion.

Methods: An LTOWB blood bank with 1 million units was simulated consisting of male, nulliparous, and parous female donors. The proportion of each donor type was modeled after the sex distribution at US blood centers. The parity of female donors was calculated based on the average number of live births per female depending on her age. HLA-alloimmunization risk was determined by her parity status. The HLA haplotypes of the simulated recipients were derived from the 100 most common HLA haplotypes in the US National Marrow Registry Program database. The proportion of different race/ethnic groups in the US was used to simulate 100,000 LTOWB recipients to whom between 1 and 10 units were administered.

Results: Overall, the risk of an LTOWB unit containing at least one HLA antibody was 12.2% and the rate of receiving an HLA-incompatible unit was 21.3%. The risk of receiving an HLA-incompatible unit rose from 4.8% after receipt of one unit to 36.5% after 10 units.

Conclusion: Blood collectors and hospitals should evaluate the potential TRALI risk against the benefit of a potentially expanded inventory of LTOWB before collecting plasma-containing products from non-HLA-tested parous female donors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
期刊最新文献
Misoprostol administration mimicking a febrile transfusion reaction. Low-titer group O whole blood implementation in a tertiary care hospital in Estonia. Quality of whole blood stored in room temperature for up to 5 days. Use of an anti-D-alloimmunization kinetics model to correct the interval censored D-alloimmunization rate following red blood cell transfusions. An in silico simulation of the frequency of administering HLA-incompatible low titer group O whole blood units when the donor pool includes unscreened female donors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1