Comparison of whole blood versus red blood cells and plasma to correct trauma-induced coagulopathy ex vivo.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1111/trf.18143
Andrea Rossetto, Paul Vulliamy, Sian Huish, Rebecca Cardigan, Laura Green, Ross Davenport
{"title":"Comparison of whole blood versus red blood cells and plasma to correct trauma-induced coagulopathy ex vivo.","authors":"Andrea Rossetto, Paul Vulliamy, Sian Huish, Rebecca Cardigan, Laura Green, Ross Davenport","doi":"10.1111/trf.18143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early resuscitation is based on platelet-poor components such as red blood cells and plasma (RBC + P), contributing to platelet dilution and worsening of trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC). We aimed to compare the ability of cold-stored whole blood (WB) versus RBC + P as a single component to correct TIC.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Blood samples were collected on admission from trauma patients who required activation of the major hemorrhage protocol at a single UK major trauma center in 2021/2022. Samples were spiked ex vivo with volumes equivalent to two, four, or eight units of WB or RBC + P stored for a maximum of 2 weeks. Thromboelastometry, platelet counting, and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Samples from 20 adult trauma patients were analyzed. Median age was 32 years (27-42), 89% were male, 70% had platelet dysfunction (tissue factor-activated ROTEM [EXTEM]-tissue factor-activated ROTEM with cytochalasin D [FIBTEM] clot amplitude at 5 min [A5] ≤ 30 mm), 65% were coagulopathic (EXTEM A5 ≤ 40 mm), and 42% died. EXTEM-FIBTEM A5 was higher following spiking with WB than RBC + P (33 mm, 26-33, vs. 27 mm, 24-30, p < .001). WB-spiking corrected platelet dysfunction in 2 patient samples out of 20, whereas RBC + P increased the frequency of platelet dysfunction (1/20 sample) and TIC (4/20 samples). RBC + P was associated with a dose-dependent deterioration in rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) clot strength and dynamics, platelet count, and aggregation in response to multiple agonists compared with WB-spiking, which maintained or partially corrected these abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with RBC + P, WB better preserves ex vivo platelet-related ROTEM parameters, platelet count, and aggregation, but does not fully correct these common derangements of TIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early resuscitation is based on platelet-poor components such as red blood cells and plasma (RBC + P), contributing to platelet dilution and worsening of trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC). We aimed to compare the ability of cold-stored whole blood (WB) versus RBC + P as a single component to correct TIC.

Study design and methods: Blood samples were collected on admission from trauma patients who required activation of the major hemorrhage protocol at a single UK major trauma center in 2021/2022. Samples were spiked ex vivo with volumes equivalent to two, four, or eight units of WB or RBC + P stored for a maximum of 2 weeks. Thromboelastometry, platelet counting, and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) were performed.

Results: Samples from 20 adult trauma patients were analyzed. Median age was 32 years (27-42), 89% were male, 70% had platelet dysfunction (tissue factor-activated ROTEM [EXTEM]-tissue factor-activated ROTEM with cytochalasin D [FIBTEM] clot amplitude at 5 min [A5] ≤ 30 mm), 65% were coagulopathic (EXTEM A5 ≤ 40 mm), and 42% died. EXTEM-FIBTEM A5 was higher following spiking with WB than RBC + P (33 mm, 26-33, vs. 27 mm, 24-30, p < .001). WB-spiking corrected platelet dysfunction in 2 patient samples out of 20, whereas RBC + P increased the frequency of platelet dysfunction (1/20 sample) and TIC (4/20 samples). RBC + P was associated with a dose-dependent deterioration in rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) clot strength and dynamics, platelet count, and aggregation in response to multiple agonists compared with WB-spiking, which maintained or partially corrected these abnormalities.

Conclusion: Compared with RBC + P, WB better preserves ex vivo platelet-related ROTEM parameters, platelet count, and aggregation, but does not fully correct these common derangements of TIC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
期刊最新文献
Misoprostol administration mimicking a febrile transfusion reaction. Low-titer group O whole blood implementation in a tertiary care hospital in Estonia. Quality of whole blood stored in room temperature for up to 5 days. Use of an anti-D-alloimmunization kinetics model to correct the interval censored D-alloimmunization rate following red blood cell transfusions. An in silico simulation of the frequency of administering HLA-incompatible low titer group O whole blood units when the donor pool includes unscreened female donors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1