Sharing "off-script": A qualitative analysis of providers' empathic self-disclosures during dignity therapy.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Palliative & Supportive Care Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1017/S1478951524002098
Emily L Mroz, Tithi Amin, Sheri Kittelson, Mary Kate Koch, Alyssa Crowe, Susan Bluck, Joshua Hauser, George F Handzo, Diana J Wilkie, Carma L Bylund
{"title":"Sharing \"off-script\": A qualitative analysis of providers' empathic self-disclosures during dignity therapy.","authors":"Emily L Mroz, Tithi Amin, Sheri Kittelson, Mary Kate Koch, Alyssa Crowe, Susan Bluck, Joshua Hauser, George F Handzo, Diana J Wilkie, Carma L Bylund","doi":"10.1017/S1478951524002098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Healthcare provider self-disclosures are common although sometimes controversial. Providers have unique opportunities to self-disclose for the purpose of conveying empathic concern during Dignity Therapy sessions. We examine the topics of empathic self-disclosures (ESDs) during Dignity Therapy sessions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 203 audio-recorded, transcribed Dignity Therapy sessions from a stepped-wedge, randomized trial of Dignity Therapy led by 14 nurses and chaplains in outpatient palliative care. We extracted 117 ESDs across sessions and applied thematic analysis guided by the constant comparative method to generate ESD topic themes and properties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Providers disclosed ESDs referring to topics of <i>Relationships and Family, Personal Experiences and Characteristics, Cohort Communalities, Location and Geography,</i> and <i>Values.</i> Though each provider led multiple Dignity Therapy sessions in this dataset, providers rarely disclosed the same information to more than one patient. Some disclosures subtly shifted the patient's life review. Providers often acknowledged patients that their self-disclosures were not prescribed elements of Dignity Therapy sessions.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Providers engage in ESD across a range of personal topics in a Dignity Therapy context. Some ESD topics overlapped with those considered appropriate in existing health communication literature. Other topics involved complex or underexamined types of disclosures. While self-disclosures appear to be made with empathic intent, providers undermined the impact of some ESDs by portraying them as unprescribed components of the conversation. More research is needed to assess the positive and negative impacts of ESDs during Dignity Therapy and to support augmentation of Dignity Therapy training protocols to account for providers' ESDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524002098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Healthcare provider self-disclosures are common although sometimes controversial. Providers have unique opportunities to self-disclose for the purpose of conveying empathic concern during Dignity Therapy sessions. We examine the topics of empathic self-disclosures (ESDs) during Dignity Therapy sessions.

Methods: We analyzed 203 audio-recorded, transcribed Dignity Therapy sessions from a stepped-wedge, randomized trial of Dignity Therapy led by 14 nurses and chaplains in outpatient palliative care. We extracted 117 ESDs across sessions and applied thematic analysis guided by the constant comparative method to generate ESD topic themes and properties.

Results: Providers disclosed ESDs referring to topics of Relationships and Family, Personal Experiences and Characteristics, Cohort Communalities, Location and Geography, and Values. Though each provider led multiple Dignity Therapy sessions in this dataset, providers rarely disclosed the same information to more than one patient. Some disclosures subtly shifted the patient's life review. Providers often acknowledged patients that their self-disclosures were not prescribed elements of Dignity Therapy sessions.

Significance of results: Providers engage in ESD across a range of personal topics in a Dignity Therapy context. Some ESD topics overlapped with those considered appropriate in existing health communication literature. Other topics involved complex or underexamined types of disclosures. While self-disclosures appear to be made with empathic intent, providers undermined the impact of some ESDs by portraying them as unprescribed components of the conversation. More research is needed to assess the positive and negative impacts of ESDs during Dignity Therapy and to support augmentation of Dignity Therapy training protocols to account for providers' ESDs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
期刊最新文献
Promising results of a resource- and activity-oriented intervention integrating rehabilitation into palliative care in people with advanced cancer: A feasibility study testing outcome measures. Sharing "off-script": A qualitative analysis of providers' empathic self-disclosures during dignity therapy. Evaluating the acceptability of a self-directed, self-management intervention for patients and caregivers facing advanced cancer. Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for advance care planning in older people: A COSMIN systematic review. Emotional ecosystems: Understanding the relationship between family interactions and anxiety among cancer caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1