The Effect of Electronic Health Record and Immunization Information System Interoperability on Medical Practice Vaccination Workflow.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1055/a-2434-5112
Kevin J Dombkowski, Pooja N Patel, Hannah K Peng, Anne E Cowan
{"title":"The Effect of Electronic Health Record and Immunization Information System Interoperability on Medical Practice Vaccination Workflow.","authors":"Kevin J Dombkowski, Pooja N Patel, Hannah K Peng, Anne E Cowan","doi":"10.1055/a-2434-5112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Interoperability between electronic health records (EHR) and immunization information systems (IIS) may positively influence data quality, affecting timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of these data. However, the extent to which EHR/IIS interoperability may influence the day-to-day vaccination workflow and related recordkeeping tasks performed at medical practices is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to assess how EHR/IIS interoperability may influence the vaccination workflow at medical practices and to identify related impacts on clinical and administrative activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We identified practices (family medicine, pediatrics, internal medicine, local health departments) from the Michigan Care Improvement Registry (MCIR), the statewide IIS in Michigan, representing each of the three HL7 interoperability levels (non-HL7, unidirectional, bidirectional). We conducted semi-structured interviews to assess how practices interact with the MCIR throughout the vaccination workflow. Transcripts were reviewed and coded to characterize practices' use of EHRs, MCIR, and other related technologies across the vaccination workflow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Practices completed Phase 1 (<i>n</i> = 45) and Phase 2 (<i>n</i> = 42) interviews, representing a range of medical specialties, geographic locations, and sizes. HL7 connectivity expanded among the participating practices; by the conclusion of the study, all practices had initiated at least unidirectional HL7 capability. Providers and staff relied heavily upon both their EHRs and MCIR throughout a wide range of vaccination-related activities. Most practices relied on MCIR as their primary source of vaccination history information, and nearly all practices also reported use of paper forms, documentation, and other summaries throughout the vaccination workflow.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Practices employed both their EHRs and IIS throughout the entire vaccination workflow, although the use of each relied heavily on paper-based processes. While benefits of adopting EHR/IIS interoperability were reported by practices, this may require staff to learn and implement new workflow processes that can be time consuming and may introduce new challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"16 1","pages":"101-110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2434-5112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Interoperability between electronic health records (EHR) and immunization information systems (IIS) may positively influence data quality, affecting timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of these data. However, the extent to which EHR/IIS interoperability may influence the day-to-day vaccination workflow and related recordkeeping tasks performed at medical practices is unclear.

Objective:  This study aimed to assess how EHR/IIS interoperability may influence the vaccination workflow at medical practices and to identify related impacts on clinical and administrative activities.

Methods:  We identified practices (family medicine, pediatrics, internal medicine, local health departments) from the Michigan Care Improvement Registry (MCIR), the statewide IIS in Michigan, representing each of the three HL7 interoperability levels (non-HL7, unidirectional, bidirectional). We conducted semi-structured interviews to assess how practices interact with the MCIR throughout the vaccination workflow. Transcripts were reviewed and coded to characterize practices' use of EHRs, MCIR, and other related technologies across the vaccination workflow.

Results:  Practices completed Phase 1 (n = 45) and Phase 2 (n = 42) interviews, representing a range of medical specialties, geographic locations, and sizes. HL7 connectivity expanded among the participating practices; by the conclusion of the study, all practices had initiated at least unidirectional HL7 capability. Providers and staff relied heavily upon both their EHRs and MCIR throughout a wide range of vaccination-related activities. Most practices relied on MCIR as their primary source of vaccination history information, and nearly all practices also reported use of paper forms, documentation, and other summaries throughout the vaccination workflow.

Conclusion:  Practices employed both their EHRs and IIS throughout the entire vaccination workflow, although the use of each relied heavily on paper-based processes. While benefits of adopting EHR/IIS interoperability were reported by practices, this may require staff to learn and implement new workflow processes that can be time consuming and may introduce new challenges.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子健康档案与免疫信息系统互操作性对医疗实践接种工作流程的影响。
背景:电子健康记录(EHR)和免疫信息系统(IIS)之间的互操作性可能对数据质量产生积极影响,影响这些数据的及时性、完整性和准确性。然而,EHR/IIS互操作性在多大程度上可能影响日常疫苗接种工作流程和医疗实践中执行的相关记录保存任务尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评估EHR/IIS互操作性如何影响医疗实践中的疫苗接种工作流程,并确定对临床和管理活动的相关影响。方法:我们从密歇根州护理改善登记处(MCIR),密歇根州的全州IIS中确定实践(家庭医学,儿科,内科,地方卫生部门),代表三个HL7互操作性级别(非HL7,单向,双向)中的每一个。我们进行了半结构化访谈,以评估在整个疫苗接种工作流程中实践如何与MCIR相互作用。对转录本进行了审查和编码,以表征整个疫苗接种工作流程中使用电子病历、MCIR和其他相关技术的做法。结果:实习医师完成了第一阶段(n = 45)和第二阶段(n = 42)访谈,代表了一系列医学专业、地理位置和规模。HL7连通性在参与实践中得到扩展;根据研究的结论,所有的实践至少已经启动了单向的HL7能力。提供者和工作人员在广泛的疫苗接种相关活动中严重依赖其电子病历和MCIR。大多数实践依赖MCIR作为疫苗接种历史信息的主要来源,几乎所有实践还报告在整个疫苗接种工作流程中使用纸质表格、文件和其他摘要。结论:实践在整个疫苗接种工作流程中都使用了他们的电子病历和IIS,尽管它们的使用严重依赖于基于纸张的流程。虽然实践报告了采用EHR/IIS互操作性的好处,但这可能需要员工学习和实施新的工作流程,这可能会耗费时间,并可能带来新的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
期刊最新文献
Leveraging a Large Language Model to Generate Quality Improvement Feedback for Clinical Notes. Evaluation of ChatGPT and Gemini in Answering Patient Questions after Gynecologic Surgery. Industry Electives in Clinical Informatics Fellowship: Early Experiences from a Multi-Institution Survey. Improving Clinicians' Digital and Artificial Intelligence-related Competence Within Healthcare Organizations in the United States: A Strategic Framework Proposal. Implementing Clinical Decision Support for Primary Care Preventive Screenings for People with Physical Disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1