Left iliac fossa sigmoidectomy with mechanical anastomosis in the management of uncomplicated sigmoid volvulus: an observational study at Principal Hospital of Dakar, Senegal.

IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pan African Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.11604/pamj.2024.49.60.42676
Eugene Gaudens Prosper Amaye Dieme, Birame Ndiaye, Magatte Faye, Samba Tiapato Faye, Moustapha Diop, Madawas Mboup, Ibrahima Sall, Oumar Fall, Alamasso Sow
{"title":"Left iliac fossa sigmoidectomy with mechanical anastomosis in the management of uncomplicated sigmoid volvulus: an observational study at Principal Hospital of Dakar, Senegal.","authors":"Eugene Gaudens Prosper Amaye Dieme, Birame Ndiaye, Magatte Faye, Samba Tiapato Faye, Moustapha Diop, Madawas Mboup, Ibrahima Sall, Oumar Fall, Alamasso Sow","doi":"10.11604/pamj.2024.49.60.42676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>sigmoidectomy is the definitive treatment of Sigmoid Volvulus (SV). It can be done either by laparotomy or laparoscopy. Our objective was to describe the left iliac fossa sigmoidectomy with mechanical anastomosis recently introduced in our practice, assess our results after 5 years and evaluate its feasibility in our setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>we conducted a prospective, descriptive and analytic study on all patients admitted for uncomplicated SV with successful non-surgical decompression and treated by a left iliac fossa sigmoidectomy with mechanical anastomosis. This study was held, from May 2016 to May 2021, at the Visceral Surgery Department of Principal Hospital of Dakar, Senegal. We studied the demographic variables, the data of the preoperative planning (time between sigmoid decompression and surgery, moment of the sigmoidectomy, mechanical bowel preparation or not, type of anesthesia), the peroperative findings (length and diameter of the sigmoid loop), the surgical procedure (the type of staplers used for the mechanical anastomosis, the duration of the operation, incidents or accidents during sigmoidectomy), the immediate and long-term postoperative course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>we collected 53 patients with a mean age of 50 years ± 17. They were 50 men and 3 women. Mechanical colonic preparation was performed in 18 patients (Group 1) and 35 patients did not benefit from a mechanical bowel preparation before surgery (Group 2). The mean length of the sigmoid loop was 74.5cm ± 16.5. The mean diameter of the descendant branch was 7.8cm ± 0.7 for Group 1 and 5.5cm ± 1 for Group 2 with p = 0.01. One linear cutter stapler was used for the side-to-side anastomosis. It was a 100mm in 43% (n=23) of cases. The terminalization of the side-to-side anastomosis was performed with 1 linear stapler in 37 cases, 2 linear staplers in 15 cases and 3 linear staplers in 1 case. The median duration of the operation was 50 minutes for Group 1 and 37 minutes for Group 2 with p = 0.004. Morbidity was nil in Group 1. In Group 2, we had 1 anastomotic leakage and 1 anastomotic stenosis. Mortality was nil in the 2 groups. The mean hospital stay was 5 days ± 3.7. The mean follow-up was 31 months with no recurrence or incisional hernia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>this surgical method is rapid, simple, reproducible and feasible in our setting with a good postoperative course. Colonic mechanical preparation may not be necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":48190,"journal":{"name":"Pan African Medical Journal","volume":"49 ","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2024.49.60.42676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: sigmoidectomy is the definitive treatment of Sigmoid Volvulus (SV). It can be done either by laparotomy or laparoscopy. Our objective was to describe the left iliac fossa sigmoidectomy with mechanical anastomosis recently introduced in our practice, assess our results after 5 years and evaluate its feasibility in our setting.

Methods: we conducted a prospective, descriptive and analytic study on all patients admitted for uncomplicated SV with successful non-surgical decompression and treated by a left iliac fossa sigmoidectomy with mechanical anastomosis. This study was held, from May 2016 to May 2021, at the Visceral Surgery Department of Principal Hospital of Dakar, Senegal. We studied the demographic variables, the data of the preoperative planning (time between sigmoid decompression and surgery, moment of the sigmoidectomy, mechanical bowel preparation or not, type of anesthesia), the peroperative findings (length and diameter of the sigmoid loop), the surgical procedure (the type of staplers used for the mechanical anastomosis, the duration of the operation, incidents or accidents during sigmoidectomy), the immediate and long-term postoperative course.

Results: we collected 53 patients with a mean age of 50 years ± 17. They were 50 men and 3 women. Mechanical colonic preparation was performed in 18 patients (Group 1) and 35 patients did not benefit from a mechanical bowel preparation before surgery (Group 2). The mean length of the sigmoid loop was 74.5cm ± 16.5. The mean diameter of the descendant branch was 7.8cm ± 0.7 for Group 1 and 5.5cm ± 1 for Group 2 with p = 0.01. One linear cutter stapler was used for the side-to-side anastomosis. It was a 100mm in 43% (n=23) of cases. The terminalization of the side-to-side anastomosis was performed with 1 linear stapler in 37 cases, 2 linear staplers in 15 cases and 3 linear staplers in 1 case. The median duration of the operation was 50 minutes for Group 1 and 37 minutes for Group 2 with p = 0.004. Morbidity was nil in Group 1. In Group 2, we had 1 anastomotic leakage and 1 anastomotic stenosis. Mortality was nil in the 2 groups. The mean hospital stay was 5 days ± 3.7. The mean follow-up was 31 months with no recurrence or incisional hernia.

Conclusion: this surgical method is rapid, simple, reproducible and feasible in our setting with a good postoperative course. Colonic mechanical preparation may not be necessary.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械吻合左髂窝乙状结肠切除术治疗单纯乙状结肠扭转:塞内加尔达喀尔主要医院的观察性研究。
乙状结肠切除术是治疗乙状结肠扭转(SV)的最终方法。可以通过剖腹手术或腹腔镜手术来完成。我们的目的是描述最近在我们的实践中引入的机械吻合左髂窝乙状结肠切除术,评估5年后的结果,并评估其在我们的环境中的可行性。方法:我们对所有入院的无并发症SV患者进行了前瞻性、描述性和分析性研究,这些患者成功地进行了非手术减压,并接受了左髂窝乙状结肠切除术和机械吻合。本研究于2016年5月至2021年5月在塞内加尔达喀尔主要医院内脏外科进行。我们研究了人口统计学变量、术前计划数据(乙状结肠减压与手术之间的时间、乙状结肠切除术的时间、是否进行机械肠准备、麻醉类型)、术中发现(乙状结肠袢的长度和直径)、手术方式(机械吻合吻合器的类型、手术时间、乙状结肠切除术期间的事件或意外)、术后近期和长期病程。结果:患者53例,平均年龄50岁±17岁。他们是50名男性和3名女性。18例患者(第一组)进行了机械结肠准备,35例患者术前没有进行机械肠道准备(第二组)。乙状结肠袢的平均长度为74.5cm±16.5。第1组后代支平均直径为7.8cm±0.7,第2组平均直径为5.5cm±1,p = 0.01。侧对侧吻合采用线形吻合器1台。43% (n=23)的病例为100mm。侧侧吻合终点采用1个线性吻合器37例,2个线性吻合器15例,3个线性吻合器1例。组1中位手术时间为50分钟,组2中位手术时间为37分钟,p = 0.004。1组发病率为零。2组吻合口瘘1例,吻合口狭窄1例。两组患者的死亡率均为零。平均住院时间为5天±3.7天。平均随访31个月,无复发及切口疝。结论:该手术方法快速、简便、重复性好,在我处可行,术后病程良好。结肠机械准备可能不需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pan African Medical Journal
Pan African Medical Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
691
期刊最新文献
Generalized vesicular rash in a child: a case of chickenpox (Varicella). Penile cancer: a rare clinical image. A case of perianal condylomata acuminata in a pregnant woman. Burden of Rhesus isoimmunization and pregnancy outcomes: a cross-sectional study conducted at Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya. The role of indigenous knowledge and cultural dynamics in immunization uptake in Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1