Role of Routine Electrophysiological Study Performed During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement to Predict AV Block.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1111/pace.15159
Mattia Pagnoni, David Meier, Adrian Luca, Stephane Fournier, Farhang Aminfar, Christelle Haddad, Niccolo Maurizi, Giulia Domenichini, Mathieu Le Bloa, Claudia Herrera Siklody, Cheryl Teres, Stephane Cook, Jean-Jacques Goy, Mario Togni, Christan Roguelov, Grégoire Girod, Vladimir Rubimbura, Marion Dupré, Eric Eeckhout, Etienne Pruvot, Olivier Muller, Patrizio Pascale
{"title":"Role of Routine Electrophysiological Study Performed During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement to Predict AV Block.","authors":"Mattia Pagnoni, David Meier, Adrian Luca, Stephane Fournier, Farhang Aminfar, Christelle Haddad, Niccolo Maurizi, Giulia Domenichini, Mathieu Le Bloa, Claudia Herrera Siklody, Cheryl Teres, Stephane Cook, Jean-Jacques Goy, Mario Togni, Christan Roguelov, Grégoire Girod, Vladimir Rubimbura, Marion Dupré, Eric Eeckhout, Etienne Pruvot, Olivier Muller, Patrizio Pascale","doi":"10.1111/pace.15159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprocedural electrophysiological (EP) testing may be useful to predict high degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) risk in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether pre- and immediate post-TAVR ECG and HV interval findings are predictive of HAVB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive TAVR patients without prior pacemaker (PM) implantation underwent ECG and standardized HV interval measurements pre- and post-TAVR using the quadripolar catheter for rapid pacing. The primary outcome was HAVB >24 h after TAVR or ventricular pacing need RESULTS: Out of 97 included patients, 8 experienced the primary outcome (7 with HAVB and 1 with PM need). On univariate analysis, pre- and post-TAVR PR, post-TAVR HV, and Delta-HV intervals were predictors of the primary outcome. A Delta-HV interval ≥18 ms predicted HAVB with sensitivity = 50% and specificity = 90% (AUC = 0.708, PPV = 31%), while an HV interval ≥60 ms after TAVR had sensitivity = 63% and specificity = 79% (AUC = 0.681, PPV = 21%). None of the patients with a PR interval ≤180 ms post-TAVR experienced the primary outcome. Among patients with new-onset LBBB, an HV interval post-TAVR >65 ms was the only predictor of HAVB (AUC = 0.776, PPV = 33%, and NPV = 97%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The yield of periprocedural EP assessment during TAVR is limited considering that about half of the at-risk patients fail to be identified. However, early periprocedural risk stratification may be more useful in the subset of patients with new-onset LBBB. Among ECG findings, a post-TAVR PR interval ≤180 ms identifies a subgroup at very low risk, independently of QRS interval and morphology.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"377-385"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Periprocedural electrophysiological (EP) testing may be useful to predict high degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) risk in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Objective: To determine whether pre- and immediate post-TAVR ECG and HV interval findings are predictive of HAVB.

Methods: Consecutive TAVR patients without prior pacemaker (PM) implantation underwent ECG and standardized HV interval measurements pre- and post-TAVR using the quadripolar catheter for rapid pacing. The primary outcome was HAVB >24 h after TAVR or ventricular pacing need RESULTS: Out of 97 included patients, 8 experienced the primary outcome (7 with HAVB and 1 with PM need). On univariate analysis, pre- and post-TAVR PR, post-TAVR HV, and Delta-HV intervals were predictors of the primary outcome. A Delta-HV interval ≥18 ms predicted HAVB with sensitivity = 50% and specificity = 90% (AUC = 0.708, PPV = 31%), while an HV interval ≥60 ms after TAVR had sensitivity = 63% and specificity = 79% (AUC = 0.681, PPV = 21%). None of the patients with a PR interval ≤180 ms post-TAVR experienced the primary outcome. Among patients with new-onset LBBB, an HV interval post-TAVR >65 ms was the only predictor of HAVB (AUC = 0.776, PPV = 33%, and NPV = 97%).

Conclusion: The yield of periprocedural EP assessment during TAVR is limited considering that about half of the at-risk patients fail to be identified. However, early periprocedural risk stratification may be more useful in the subset of patients with new-onset LBBB. Among ECG findings, a post-TAVR PR interval ≤180 ms identifies a subgroup at very low risk, independently of QRS interval and morphology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经导管主动脉瓣置换术中常规电生理研究对预测房室传导阻滞的作用。
背景:围手术期电生理(EP)测试可能有助于预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者高度房室传导阻滞(HAVB)的风险。目的:探讨tavr前后心电图及HV间期表现是否能预测HAVB的发生。方法:连续未植入起搏器(PM)的TAVR患者在TAVR前后使用四极导管进行快速起搏,进行心电图和标准化的HV间期测量。结果:在纳入的97例患者中,8例经历了主要结局(7例HAVB, 1例PM需要)。在单变量分析中,tavr前后的PR、tavr后的HV和Delta-HV间隔是主要结局的预测因子。δ -HV间隔≥18 ms预测HAVB的灵敏度= 50%,特异性= 90% (AUC = 0.708, PPV = 31%),而TAVR后HV间隔≥60 ms预测HAVB的灵敏度= 63%,特异性= 79% (AUC = 0.681, PPV = 21%)。tavr后PR间期≤180 ms的患者均未出现主要结局。在新发LBBB患者中,tavr后HV间期bb0 ~ 65ms是HAVB的唯一预测因子(AUC = 0.776, PPV = 33%, NPV = 97%)。结论:TAVR术中围术期EP评估的成功率有限,因为约有一半的高危患者未能被发现。然而,早期围手术期风险分层可能对新发LBBB患者更有用。在ECG表现中,tavr后PR间期≤180 ms表明该亚组风险极低,与QRS间期和形态学无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
209
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (PACE) is the foremost peer-reviewed journal in the field of pacing and implantable cardioversion defibrillation, publishing over 50% of all English language articles in its field, featuring original, review, and didactic papers, and case reports related to daily practice. Articles also include editorials, book reviews, Musings on humane topics relevant to medical practice, electrophysiology (EP) rounds, device rounds, and information concerning the quality of devices used in the practice of the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Coronary Spasm Due to Pulsed Field Ablation: A State-of-the-Art Review. Lesion Formation in Cardiac Pulsed-Field Ablation: Acute to Chronic Cellular Level Changes. Fundamentals of System Design for Cardiac Pulsed Field Ablation: Optimization of Safety, Efficacy, and Usability. Functional Substrate Mapping Using Atrial Decrement Evoked Potentials to Predict Critical Isthmus of Atrial Tachycardia. Gastric Hypomotility After Pulmonary Vein Isolation With or Without Left Atrial Roof Ablation Using a Novel Cryoballoon.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1