Analysis of the practice of switch of antibiotics from intravenous to oral therapy at a tertiary care hospital in Nepal: a prospective observational study.

Upasana Acharya, Sweta Shrestha, Aastha Rawal, Laxmi Dangol, Binaya Sapkota
{"title":"Analysis of the practice of switch of antibiotics from intravenous to oral therapy at a tertiary care hospital in Nepal: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Upasana Acharya, Sweta Shrestha, Aastha Rawal, Laxmi Dangol, Binaya Sapkota","doi":"10.1017/ash.2024.494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study analyzed the practice of switching intravenous antibiotics to oral dosage form in a tertiary care hospital of Nepal.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective observational study was performed among patients admitted to medical/surgical wards in a private tertiary care hospital of Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospitalized adult patients who received IV antibiotics for at least 48 hours and met the eligibility criteria were enrolled in the study. The detailed information on use of antibiotics such as indication, duration, type time of switch etc. were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 335 patients, 282(83.9%) met the eligibility criteria for intravenous (IV) to oral conversion however, only 18.7% of patients were switched to oral regimen. Step-down conversion was the common type of IV to oral switch. Almost all patients were empirically treated with β-lactams antibiotics (n = 327). There was significant association between the antibiotic class and duration of IV therapy (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The length of hospital stays and duration of IV antibiotics therapy was lower in the timely converted group than in the non-converted groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The duration of IV antibiotics therapy was strongly correlated with duration of hospital stay (<i>r</i> = 0.743, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings revealed a low prevalence of conversion from IV antibiotics to oral, despite a higher percentage of patients meeting the eligibility criteria for conversion. There is a need for the implementation of structured program to review patients on IV antibiotics and promote timely conversion to oral once they meet the conversion criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2024.494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study analyzed the practice of switching intravenous antibiotics to oral dosage form in a tertiary care hospital of Nepal.

Design: A prospective observational study was performed among patients admitted to medical/surgical wards in a private tertiary care hospital of Nepal.

Methods: Hospitalized adult patients who received IV antibiotics for at least 48 hours and met the eligibility criteria were enrolled in the study. The detailed information on use of antibiotics such as indication, duration, type time of switch etc. were collected and analyzed.

Results: Among 335 patients, 282(83.9%) met the eligibility criteria for intravenous (IV) to oral conversion however, only 18.7% of patients were switched to oral regimen. Step-down conversion was the common type of IV to oral switch. Almost all patients were empirically treated with β-lactams antibiotics (n = 327). There was significant association between the antibiotic class and duration of IV therapy (P < 0.001). The length of hospital stays and duration of IV antibiotics therapy was lower in the timely converted group than in the non-converted groups (P < 0.001). The duration of IV antibiotics therapy was strongly correlated with duration of hospital stay (r = 0.743, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The findings revealed a low prevalence of conversion from IV antibiotics to oral, despite a higher percentage of patients meeting the eligibility criteria for conversion. There is a need for the implementation of structured program to review patients on IV antibiotics and promote timely conversion to oral once they meet the conversion criteria.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔一家三级医院将抗生素从静脉注射转为口服治疗的实践分析:一项前瞻性观察研究。
目的:分析尼泊尔某三级医院静脉给药改为口服给药的做法。设计:对尼泊尔一家私立三级医院内科/外科病房的患者进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。方法:纳入符合条件且接受静脉注射抗生素治疗至少48小时的住院成年患者。收集并分析患者抗菌药物使用的适应症、持续时间、切换类型时间等详细信息。结果:335例患者中,282例(83.9%)患者符合静脉(IV)转口服方案的资格标准,但只有18.7%的患者转为口服方案。降压转换是常见的静脉到口腔切换类型。几乎所有患者均经验性使用β-内酰胺类抗生素(n = 327)。抗生素种类与静脉治疗时间有显著相关性(P < 0.001)。及时转化组的住院时间和静脉抗生素治疗时间均低于未转化组(P < 0.001)。静脉抗生素治疗时间与住院时间密切相关(r = 0.743, P < 0.001)。结论:研究结果显示,尽管符合转换资格标准的患者比例较高,但从静脉注射抗生素转换为口服抗生素的患病率较低。有必要实施结构化的程序来审查静脉注射抗生素的患者,并促进及时转换为口服,一旦他们符合转换标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing antimicrobial stewardship through IT-enabled audits: a quasi-experimental study in urology. Clinical outcomes of carbapenem vs. non-carbapenem therapy in hospitalized adults with shigellosis. Point-of-care routine laboratory testing for patients with suspected viral hemorrhagic fevers. Clinical outcomes and treatment effectiveness in patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Factors and outcomes of pediatric sepsis under an antimicrobial stewardship program in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Thailand: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1