How to perform a high-quality peer review.

Q4 Health Professions Clinical hematology international Pub Date : 2025-02-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.46989/001c.128601
Mohamad Mohty, Junia V Melo
{"title":"How to perform a high-quality peer review.","authors":"Mohamad Mohty, Junia V Melo","doi":"10.46989/001c.128601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-quality peer review is a cornerstone of credible and impactful scientific and medical publishing. This manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of the best practices, responsibilities, and evaluation criteria for peer reviewers in clinical and translational research. By adhering to high standards of objectivity, rigor and professionalism, peer reviewers support the integrity of scientific research and contribute to the evolution of evidence-based medicine. We elaborate on the principles and structured processes that ensure a thorough, impartial review, aiming to guide reviewers in producing evaluations that enrich the scientific discourse and foster innovation in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":93942,"journal":{"name":"Clinical hematology international","volume":"7 1","pages":"10-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11797007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical hematology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46989/001c.128601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-quality peer review is a cornerstone of credible and impactful scientific and medical publishing. This manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of the best practices, responsibilities, and evaluation criteria for peer reviewers in clinical and translational research. By adhering to high standards of objectivity, rigor and professionalism, peer reviewers support the integrity of scientific research and contribute to the evolution of evidence-based medicine. We elaborate on the principles and structured processes that ensure a thorough, impartial review, aiming to guide reviewers in producing evaluations that enrich the scientific discourse and foster innovation in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何进行高质量的同行评审。
高质量的同行评议是可信和有影响力的科学和医学出版的基石。这份手稿提供了临床和转化研究中同行审稿人的最佳实践、责任和评估标准的全面概述。通过坚持客观、严谨和专业的高标准,同行审稿人支持科学研究的完整性,并为循证医学的发展做出贡献。我们详细阐述了确保全面、公正审查的原则和结构化过程,旨在指导审稿人进行丰富科学论述和促进临床实践创新的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Factor XIII Deficiency: A Review of Biology, Testing, and Treatment. Ciclosporin as upfront therapy in Subcutaneous Panniculitis-like T-cell Lymphoma with aggressive features and in uncomplicated disease: Two case reports and literature review. Clinical Warburg Effect in a primary cutaneous lymphoma. Spleen and Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the management of adult immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Real-world outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma with prior proteasome inhibitor and lenalidomide exposure: A single-center study in Sweden.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1