Common spine codes are reimbursed 13% less by Medicaid compared to Medicare, ranging from 46% to 160% by state

IF 2.5 Q3 Medicine North American Spine Society Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100585
Adam P. Henderson BS , M. Lane Moore MD, MBA , Camryn S. Payne BA , Jack M. Haglin MD, MS , Joseph C. Brinkman MD , Paul R. Van Schuyver MD , Joshua S. Bingham MD , Michael S. Chang MD
{"title":"Common spine codes are reimbursed 13% less by Medicaid compared to Medicare, ranging from 46% to 160% by state","authors":"Adam P. Henderson BS ,&nbsp;M. Lane Moore MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Camryn S. Payne BA ,&nbsp;Jack M. Haglin MD, MS ,&nbsp;Joseph C. Brinkman MD ,&nbsp;Paul R. Van Schuyver MD ,&nbsp;Joshua S. Bingham MD ,&nbsp;Michael S. Chang MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Medicare reimbursement for spine procedures has been decreasing, and it is well-established that Medicaid reimburses physicians even less than Medicare. This study seeks to provide an updated analysis of Medicaid reimbursement using 24 common spine procedure codes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Medicaid rates were obtained from state online fee schedules, and Medicare rates from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid online fee database. Rates were compared directly to each other by state and averaged to reflect national differences. The Medicare Wage Index was used to control for variability in wages between states and was used to adjust Medicaid data for comparison. Variability between states and codes was quantified using coefficient of variation values.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Medicaid reimbursement was lower than Medicare for all 24 included Current Procedural Terminology codes. Nationally, Medicaid rates were 13% less than Medicare, and this difference increased to 25% when adjusting for wage differences. Average cost differences were −$118 per code. Substantial variability between states and codes was also found for Medicaid, while little variability in Medicare rates existed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found that Medicaid reimbursement to surgeons for 24 common spine surgeons was 13% less than Medicare on average. This difference increased to 25% when adjusting for wage differences. For Medicaid, wide variability existed between states and between different codes, indicating that some state payment systems may lack objective metrics when determining rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100585"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548425000058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Medicare reimbursement for spine procedures has been decreasing, and it is well-established that Medicaid reimburses physicians even less than Medicare. This study seeks to provide an updated analysis of Medicaid reimbursement using 24 common spine procedure codes.

Methods

Medicaid rates were obtained from state online fee schedules, and Medicare rates from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid online fee database. Rates were compared directly to each other by state and averaged to reflect national differences. The Medicare Wage Index was used to control for variability in wages between states and was used to adjust Medicaid data for comparison. Variability between states and codes was quantified using coefficient of variation values.

Results

Medicaid reimbursement was lower than Medicare for all 24 included Current Procedural Terminology codes. Nationally, Medicaid rates were 13% less than Medicare, and this difference increased to 25% when adjusting for wage differences. Average cost differences were −$118 per code. Substantial variability between states and codes was also found for Medicaid, while little variability in Medicare rates existed.

Conclusions

We found that Medicaid reimbursement to surgeons for 24 common spine surgeons was 13% less than Medicare on average. This difference increased to 25% when adjusting for wage differences. For Medicaid, wide variability existed between states and between different codes, indicating that some state payment systems may lack objective metrics when determining rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与医疗保险相比,医疗补助计划对普通脊柱代码的报销要少13%,各州的报销范围从46%到160%不等
医疗保险对脊柱手术的报销一直在减少,而且医疗补助对医生的报销甚至比医疗保险还少。本研究旨在使用24种常见的脊柱程序代码提供医疗补助报销的最新分析。方法医疗补助费率来自各州在线收费表,医疗保险费率来自医疗保险中心和医疗补助在线收费数据库。各州之间的比率直接比较,并取平均值以反映国家差异。医疗保险工资指数用于控制各州之间工资的可变性,并用于调整医疗补助数据以进行比较。状态和代码之间的可变性使用变异值系数进行量化。结果在所有24个现行程序术语编码中,医疗补助报销低于医疗保险。在全国范围内,医疗补助率比医疗保险低13%,在调整工资差异后,这一差距扩大到25%。每个代码的平均成本差异为- 118美元。医疗补助在各州和各州之间也存在很大差异,而医疗保险费率几乎没有变化。结论:我们发现24名普通脊柱外科医生的医疗补助报销比医疗保险平均少13%。在调整工资差异后,这一差异增加到25%。对于医疗补助,各州之间和不同代码之间存在很大的差异,这表明一些州的支付系统在确定费率时可能缺乏客观的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use and clinical outcomes after posterior cervical spinal fusion for degenerative pathologies: A large cohort retrospective analysis Hollow viscus perforation after spine surgery: A focused review with illustrative cases Sacroiliac joint fixation with a posterior intra-articular implant versus a posterolateral transiliac implant: A biomechanical comparison Development and internal validation of a clinico-radiological classification system for lumbar adjacent segment degeneration after TLIF Increasing adverse event reports coincide with declining Medicare billings for interspinous devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1