Generative AI chatbots for reliable cancer information: Evaluating web-search, multilingual, and reference capabilities of emerging large language models

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY European Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-11 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115274
Bradley D. Menz , Natansh D. Modi , Ahmad Y. Abuhelwa , Warit Ruanglertboon , Agnes Vitry , Yuan Gao , Lee X. Li , Rakchha Chhetri , Bianca Chu , Stephen Bacchi , Ganessan Kichenadasse , Adel Shahnam , Andrew Rowland , Michael J. Sorich , Ashley M. Hopkins
{"title":"Generative AI chatbots for reliable cancer information: Evaluating web-search, multilingual, and reference capabilities of emerging large language models","authors":"Bradley D. Menz ,&nbsp;Natansh D. Modi ,&nbsp;Ahmad Y. Abuhelwa ,&nbsp;Warit Ruanglertboon ,&nbsp;Agnes Vitry ,&nbsp;Yuan Gao ,&nbsp;Lee X. Li ,&nbsp;Rakchha Chhetri ,&nbsp;Bianca Chu ,&nbsp;Stephen Bacchi ,&nbsp;Ganessan Kichenadasse ,&nbsp;Adel Shahnam ,&nbsp;Andrew Rowland ,&nbsp;Michael J. Sorich ,&nbsp;Ashley M. Hopkins","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) enable real-time web search, improved referencing, and multilingual support, yet ensuring they provide safe health information remains crucial. This perspective evaluates seven publicly accessible LLMs—ChatGPT, Co-Pilot, Gemini, MetaAI, Claude, Grok, Perplexity—on three simple cancer-related queries across eight languages (336 responses: English, French, Chinese, Thai, Hindi, Nepali, Vietnamese, and Arabic). None of the 42 English responses contained clinically meaningful hallucinations, whereas 7 of 294 non-English responses did. 48 % (162/336) of responses included valid references, but 39 % of the English references were.com links reflecting quality concerns. English responses frequently exceeded an eighth-grade level, and many non-English outputs were also complex. These findings reflect substantial progress over the past 2-years but reveal persistent gaps in multilingual accuracy, reliable reference inclusion, referral practices, and readability. Ongoing benchmarking is essential to ensure LLMs safely support global health information dichotomy and meet online information standards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 115274"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804925000553","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) enable real-time web search, improved referencing, and multilingual support, yet ensuring they provide safe health information remains crucial. This perspective evaluates seven publicly accessible LLMs—ChatGPT, Co-Pilot, Gemini, MetaAI, Claude, Grok, Perplexity—on three simple cancer-related queries across eight languages (336 responses: English, French, Chinese, Thai, Hindi, Nepali, Vietnamese, and Arabic). None of the 42 English responses contained clinically meaningful hallucinations, whereas 7 of 294 non-English responses did. 48 % (162/336) of responses included valid references, but 39 % of the English references were.com links reflecting quality concerns. English responses frequently exceeded an eighth-grade level, and many non-English outputs were also complex. These findings reflect substantial progress over the past 2-years but reveal persistent gaps in multilingual accuracy, reliable reference inclusion, referral practices, and readability. Ongoing benchmarking is essential to ensure LLMs safely support global health information dichotomy and meet online information standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于可靠癌症信息的生成式AI聊天机器人:评估新兴大型语言模型的网络搜索、多语言和参考能力
大型语言模型(llm)的最新进展使实时网络搜索、改进的参考和多语言支持成为可能,但确保它们提供安全的健康信息仍然至关重要。这一视角评估了7个可公开访问的法学硕士——chatgpt、Co-Pilot、Gemini、MetaAI、Claude、Grok、perplexity——关于8种语言(336个回答:英语、法语、中文、泰语、印度语、尼泊尔语、越南语和阿拉伯语)的3个简单的癌症相关查询。42个英文回答中没有一个包含有临床意义的幻觉,而294个非英文回答中有7个包含。48% %(162/336)的回复包含有效参考文献,但39% %的英文参考文献是反映质量问题的。com链接。英语的回答经常超过八年级的水平,许多非英语的输出也很复杂。这些发现反映了过去两年的实质性进展,但也揭示了在多语言准确性、可靠的参考文献收录、参考实践和可读性方面的持续差距。持续的基准测试对于确保法学硕士安全地支持全球卫生信息二分法和满足在线信息标准至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer
European Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
953
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer (EJC) serves as a comprehensive platform integrating preclinical, digital, translational, and clinical research across the spectrum of cancer. From epidemiology, carcinogenesis, and biology to groundbreaking innovations in cancer treatment and patient care, the journal covers a wide array of topics. We publish original research, reviews, previews, editorial comments, and correspondence, fostering dialogue and advancement in the fight against cancer. Join us in our mission to drive progress and improve outcomes in cancer research and patient care.
期刊最新文献
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 2025 Program for Early Career Investigators: Advancing Ideas into Clinical Research Exploring the diversity of rare exocrine pancreatic cancers: A histo-molecular mapping of a French tertiary-centre cohort Income, treatment patterns and outcome in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer Toremifene in desmoid fibromatosis: Prospective phase 2 study of two dose levels Aflibercept and 5-FU vs. FOLFOX as 1st line treatment for older adults or frail elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer – The randomized phase 2 AIO / IKF ELDERLY trial (AIO-KRK-0117 / IKF 629)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1