E-Cigarette Use and Use of Evidence-Based Smoking Cessation Methods Among American Indian Cigarette Smokers: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Ashley L. Comiford DrPH , Dorothy A. Rhoades MD, MPH , Justin D. Dvorak PhD , Kai Ding PhD , Noah Collins , Alexandra L. Blair , Mark P. Doescher MD, MSPH
{"title":"E-Cigarette Use and Use of Evidence-Based Smoking Cessation Methods Among American Indian Cigarette Smokers: A Cross-Sectional Analysis","authors":"Ashley L. Comiford DrPH ,&nbsp;Dorothy A. Rhoades MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Justin D. Dvorak PhD ,&nbsp;Kai Ding PhD ,&nbsp;Noah Collins ,&nbsp;Alexandra L. Blair ,&nbsp;Mark P. Doescher MD, MSPH","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Tobacco use is the leading cause of death in the U.S., and American Indian/Alaska Native people have high rates of tobacco-related diseases. Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved products and evidence-based methods exist for smoking cessation, people who smoke might use E-cigarettes as cessation aids. Whether E-cigarette use is associated with the use of evidence-based methods is unknown, particularly among American Indian/Alaska Native individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using survey data collected in 2016 from 289 adult American Indian people who smoke and who reported a previous cessation attempt, the authors conducted multivariate logistic regression analyses to assess the associations between E-cigarette use and evidence-based cessation methods. Analyses were performed in 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Individuals who currently or formerly used E-cigarettes were significantly more likely to report using nicotine replacement therapy during their last quit attempt than those who did not use E-cigarettes (current versus never AOR=4.6, 95% CI=1.9, 11.9; past versus never AOR=4.6, 95% CI=2.2, 9.8; <em>p</em>&lt;0.001). Current and former E-cigarette use was significantly associated with prescription use in the unadjusted analysis but lost significance in the adjusted analysis (current versus never AOR=3.1, 95% CI=1.0, 10.5; past versus never AOR=2.7, 95% CI=1.1, 7.9; <em>p</em>&gt;0.05). Individuals with current or former use of E-cigarettes were significantly less likely than individuals who never used E-cigarettes to use the cold turkey method (unassisted cessation) (current versus never AOR=0.3, 95% CI=0.2, 0.6; past versus never AOR=0.3, 95% CI=0.1, 0.7; <em>p</em>&lt;0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These results suggest that persons who use E-cigarettes are more likely than individuals who do not use E-cigarettes to previously have tried nicotine replacement therapy but less likely to use the cold turkey method. A larger study is needed to determine whether individuals who use E-cigarettes are also more likely to have tried prescription medication for smoking cessation. Whether E-cigarette use impedes or encourages the use of evidence-based cessation methods is unknown.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424001202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Tobacco use is the leading cause of death in the U.S., and American Indian/Alaska Native people have high rates of tobacco-related diseases. Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved products and evidence-based methods exist for smoking cessation, people who smoke might use E-cigarettes as cessation aids. Whether E-cigarette use is associated with the use of evidence-based methods is unknown, particularly among American Indian/Alaska Native individuals.

Methods

Using survey data collected in 2016 from 289 adult American Indian people who smoke and who reported a previous cessation attempt, the authors conducted multivariate logistic regression analyses to assess the associations between E-cigarette use and evidence-based cessation methods. Analyses were performed in 2023.

Results

Individuals who currently or formerly used E-cigarettes were significantly more likely to report using nicotine replacement therapy during their last quit attempt than those who did not use E-cigarettes (current versus never AOR=4.6, 95% CI=1.9, 11.9; past versus never AOR=4.6, 95% CI=2.2, 9.8; p<0.001). Current and former E-cigarette use was significantly associated with prescription use in the unadjusted analysis but lost significance in the adjusted analysis (current versus never AOR=3.1, 95% CI=1.0, 10.5; past versus never AOR=2.7, 95% CI=1.1, 7.9; p>0.05). Individuals with current or former use of E-cigarettes were significantly less likely than individuals who never used E-cigarettes to use the cold turkey method (unassisted cessation) (current versus never AOR=0.3, 95% CI=0.2, 0.6; past versus never AOR=0.3, 95% CI=0.1, 0.7; p<0.01).

Conclusions

These results suggest that persons who use E-cigarettes are more likely than individuals who do not use E-cigarettes to previously have tried nicotine replacement therapy but less likely to use the cold turkey method. A larger study is needed to determine whether individuals who use E-cigarettes are also more likely to have tried prescription medication for smoking cessation. Whether E-cigarette use impedes or encourages the use of evidence-based cessation methods is unknown.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国印第安吸烟者中电子烟的使用和基于证据的戒烟方法的使用:一项横断面分析
烟草使用是美国人死亡的主要原因,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民患烟草相关疾病的比例很高。尽管美国食品和药物管理局批准了戒烟产品和基于证据的方法,但吸烟者可能会使用电子烟作为戒烟辅助工具。电子烟的使用是否与循证方法的使用有关尚不清楚,特别是在美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民中。方法利用2016年从289名吸烟并报告曾尝试戒烟的成年美国印第安人收集的调查数据,作者进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估电子烟使用与循证戒烟方法之间的关系。分析于2023年进行。结果:目前或以前使用电子烟的个体在最后一次戒烟尝试中使用尼古丁替代疗法的可能性明显高于未使用电子烟的个体(当前与从未使用电子烟的AOR=4.6, 95% CI=1.9, 11.9;过去与从未的AOR=4.6, 95% CI=2.2, 9.8;术中,0.001)。在未经调整的分析中,当前和以前的电子烟使用与处方使用显著相关,但在调整的分析中失去了显著性(当前与从未的AOR=3.1, 95% CI=1.0, 10.5;过去与从未AOR=2.7, 95% CI=1.1, 7.9;p> 0.05)。与从未吸过电子烟的人相比,目前或曾经吸过电子烟的人使用突然戒烟法(无辅助戒烟)的可能性显著降低(目前与从未吸过电子烟的AOR=0.3, 95% CI=0.2, 0.6;过去与从未的AOR=0.3, 95% CI=0.1, 0.7;术中,0.01)。这些结果表明,使用电子烟的人比不使用电子烟的人更有可能之前尝试过尼古丁替代疗法,但不太可能使用突然停止的方法。需要进行更大规模的研究,以确定使用电子烟的人是否更有可能尝试过处方药戒烟。电子烟的使用是否会阻碍或鼓励基于证据的戒烟方法的使用尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Virtual Versus In-Person Delivery on Behavior Changes Among Adults Enrolled in the Diabetes Prevention Program in the Rio Grande Valley, Texas: A Secondary Analysis. Editorial Board and Journal Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1