Improved A* algorithm incorporating RRT* thought: A path planning algorithm for AGV in digitalised workshops

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Operations Research Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.cor.2025.106993
Na Liu, Zihang Hu, Min Wei, Pengfei Guo, Shuhan Zhang, Aodi Zhang
{"title":"Improved A* algorithm incorporating RRT* thought: A path planning algorithm for AGV in digitalised workshops","authors":"Na Liu,&nbsp;Zihang Hu,&nbsp;Min Wei,&nbsp;Pengfei Guo,&nbsp;Shuhan Zhang,&nbsp;Aodi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.cor.2025.106993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The implementation of efficient path planning algorithms can facilitate enhanced transport efficiency in AGVs (Automated Guided Vehicles). However, the current path planning algorithms used in the workshop can determine the shortest path, but there are problems such as low search efficiency, long search time, and many path inflection points. Such issues have the potential to negatively impact the transport efficiency of the AGV, rendering them unsuitable for actual workshop conditions. This paper proposes a new algorithm, named IA-RRT* (Improved A* Algorithm Integrating RRT* Thought), for path planning of AGV in digitalised workshops. The algorithm modifies the cost evaluation function of the A* algorithm to provide a less strong direction for the search, narrowing the search scope and preventing the algorithm from converging too quickly and getting stuck in a local optimal path. Meanwhile, the IA-RRT* algorithm combines the randomness concept of the RRT* algorithm with an inflection point penalty term. The objective is to find a path with fewer inflection points, making it more practical for production. Simulation experiments have shown that the IA-RRT* algorithm outperforms several other path planning algorithms in terms of path length cost, algorithm calculation time, and number of inflection points. The paths generated by the IA-RRT* algorithm are applicable to the working situation of AGV and have practical significance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10542,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Operations Research","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 106993"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054825000218","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implementation of efficient path planning algorithms can facilitate enhanced transport efficiency in AGVs (Automated Guided Vehicles). However, the current path planning algorithms used in the workshop can determine the shortest path, but there are problems such as low search efficiency, long search time, and many path inflection points. Such issues have the potential to negatively impact the transport efficiency of the AGV, rendering them unsuitable for actual workshop conditions. This paper proposes a new algorithm, named IA-RRT* (Improved A* Algorithm Integrating RRT* Thought), for path planning of AGV in digitalised workshops. The algorithm modifies the cost evaluation function of the A* algorithm to provide a less strong direction for the search, narrowing the search scope and preventing the algorithm from converging too quickly and getting stuck in a local optimal path. Meanwhile, the IA-RRT* algorithm combines the randomness concept of the RRT* algorithm with an inflection point penalty term. The objective is to find a path with fewer inflection points, making it more practical for production. Simulation experiments have shown that the IA-RRT* algorithm outperforms several other path planning algorithms in terms of path length cost, algorithm calculation time, and number of inflection points. The paths generated by the IA-RRT* algorithm are applicable to the working situation of AGV and have practical significance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合RRT*思想的改进A*算法:数字化车间AGV路径规划算法
实施高效的路径规划算法可以提高自动导引车的运输效率。然而,目前研讨会中使用的路径规划算法可以确定最短路径,但存在搜索效率低、搜索时间长、路径拐点多等问题。这些问题有可能对AGV的运输效率产生负面影响,使其不适合实际的车间条件。针对数字化车间中AGV的路径规划问题,提出了一种新的算法IA-RRT*(集成RRT*思想的改进a *算法)。该算法修改了A*算法的代价评价函数,为搜索提供了不那么强的方向,缩小了搜索范围,防止算法收敛过快而陷入局部最优路径。同时,IA-RRT*算法将RRT*算法的随机性概念与拐点惩罚项相结合。目标是找到一条拐点更少的路径,使其在生产中更实用。仿真实验表明,IA-RRT*算法在路径长度代价、算法计算时间和拐点数量等方面都优于其他几种路径规划算法。IA-RRT*算法生成的路径适用于AGV的工作情况,具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Operations Research
Computers & Operations Research 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
292
审稿时长
8.5 months
期刊介绍: Operations research and computers meet in a large number of scientific fields, many of which are of vital current concern to our troubled society. These include, among others, ecology, transportation, safety, reliability, urban planning, economics, inventory control, investment strategy and logistics (including reverse logistics). Computers & Operations Research provides an international forum for the application of computers and operations research techniques to problems in these and related fields.
期刊最新文献
Bicycle Improvement Design Problem using real bike trajectories Learning-based TSP-solvers tend to be overly greedy A multi-objective approach for the integrated allocation of quay cranes, internal trucks, and yard cranes in container terminal considering actual handling efficiency Collaborative multi-agent DRL for energy-efficient task offloading and resource allocation in WBAN-MEC systems Hybrid quantum annealing for price optimization under cross‑elastic demand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1