Aerodynamic characteristics of windbreak wall–wind barrier transition section along high-speed railways during strong crosswinds

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106038
E Deng , Ling-Yi Diao , Huan Yue , Yue Dong
{"title":"Aerodynamic characteristics of windbreak wall–wind barrier transition section along high-speed railways during strong crosswinds","authors":"E Deng ,&nbsp;Ling-Yi Diao ,&nbsp;Huan Yue ,&nbsp;Yue Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the embankment–bridge transition section of high-speed railroads, solid windbreak walls and porous wind barriers serve as primary engineering measures to mitigate the effects of strong winds. This study investigates the mechanisms by which the aerodynamic performance of the transition section between solid windbreak walls and porous wind barriers deteriorates. Aerodynamic loads on trains, bridges, and wind barriers are analyzed in this study, which also examines the evolution of flow field characteristics and power spectral density (PSD) across spatial and temporal scales, based on wind tunnel tests, flow visualization tests, and computational fluid dynamics methods. The results reveal that the presence of double-sided wind barriers alters the distribution of turbulence intensity and vortex structures near the bridge–wind barriers compared to single-sided wind barriers. Additionally, double-sided wind barriers greatly increase the aerodynamic loads on trains and bridge–wind barriers compared to single-sided wind barriers. Furthermore, the peak PSD values for bridge-wind barriers with double-sided wind barriers are 1.9–4 times higher than those with single-sided wind barriers. Consequently, the single-sided wind barrier may be a more suitable choice for handling unidirectional crosswinds, considering construction costs and structural safety concerns for both the bridge and the wind barrier.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 106038"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610525000340","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the embankment–bridge transition section of high-speed railroads, solid windbreak walls and porous wind barriers serve as primary engineering measures to mitigate the effects of strong winds. This study investigates the mechanisms by which the aerodynamic performance of the transition section between solid windbreak walls and porous wind barriers deteriorates. Aerodynamic loads on trains, bridges, and wind barriers are analyzed in this study, which also examines the evolution of flow field characteristics and power spectral density (PSD) across spatial and temporal scales, based on wind tunnel tests, flow visualization tests, and computational fluid dynamics methods. The results reveal that the presence of double-sided wind barriers alters the distribution of turbulence intensity and vortex structures near the bridge–wind barriers compared to single-sided wind barriers. Additionally, double-sided wind barriers greatly increase the aerodynamic loads on trains and bridge–wind barriers compared to single-sided wind barriers. Furthermore, the peak PSD values for bridge-wind barriers with double-sided wind barriers are 1.9–4 times higher than those with single-sided wind barriers. Consequently, the single-sided wind barrier may be a more suitable choice for handling unidirectional crosswinds, considering construction costs and structural safety concerns for both the bridge and the wind barrier.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强侧风作用下高速铁路防风墙-风障过渡段气动特性研究
在高速铁路路桥过渡段,坚固的防风墙和多孔的防风屏障是缓解强风影响的主要工程措施。本文研究了固体防风墙与多孔防风屏障之间过渡段气动性能恶化的机理。基于风洞试验、流动可视化试验和计算流体动力学方法,本研究分析了列车、桥梁和风障上的气动载荷,并研究了流场特性和功率谱密度(PSD)在时空尺度上的演变。结果表明,与单面风障相比,双面风障的存在改变了桥风障附近湍流强度和涡结构的分布。此外,与单面风障相比,双面风障大大增加了列车和桥梁风障的气动载荷。此外,具有双面风障的桥式风障的峰值PSD值是单面风障的1.9 ~ 4倍。因此,考虑到桥梁和风障的建设成本和结构安全问题,单面风障可能是处理单向侧风的更合适的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
22.90%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects. Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.
期刊最新文献
Wind-induced forces and flutter aeroelasticity of rectangular sections under amplitude effects: a comparative study Analysis of wake model characteristics based on wind field experiments and numerical simulations Comparative study on train-track flow field and tail car lift in high-speed EMS maglev trains with multiple marshalling lengths Advancing tornado-like vortex (TLV) generation in straight-line wind simulators: An LES study Neural network-based eddy viscosity prediction for bluff body vehicle wake flow at high Reynolds number
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1