Aerodynamic characteristics of windbreak wall–wind barrier transition section along high-speed railways during strong crosswinds

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106038
E Deng , Ling-Yi Diao , Huan Yue , Yue Dong
{"title":"Aerodynamic characteristics of windbreak wall–wind barrier transition section along high-speed railways during strong crosswinds","authors":"E Deng ,&nbsp;Ling-Yi Diao ,&nbsp;Huan Yue ,&nbsp;Yue Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the embankment–bridge transition section of high-speed railroads, solid windbreak walls and porous wind barriers serve as primary engineering measures to mitigate the effects of strong winds. This study investigates the mechanisms by which the aerodynamic performance of the transition section between solid windbreak walls and porous wind barriers deteriorates. Aerodynamic loads on trains, bridges, and wind barriers are analyzed in this study, which also examines the evolution of flow field characteristics and power spectral density (PSD) across spatial and temporal scales, based on wind tunnel tests, flow visualization tests, and computational fluid dynamics methods. The results reveal that the presence of double-sided wind barriers alters the distribution of turbulence intensity and vortex structures near the bridge–wind barriers compared to single-sided wind barriers. Additionally, double-sided wind barriers greatly increase the aerodynamic loads on trains and bridge–wind barriers compared to single-sided wind barriers. Furthermore, the peak PSD values for bridge-wind barriers with double-sided wind barriers are 1.9–4 times higher than those with single-sided wind barriers. Consequently, the single-sided wind barrier may be a more suitable choice for handling unidirectional crosswinds, considering construction costs and structural safety concerns for both the bridge and the wind barrier.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 106038"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610525000340","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the embankment–bridge transition section of high-speed railroads, solid windbreak walls and porous wind barriers serve as primary engineering measures to mitigate the effects of strong winds. This study investigates the mechanisms by which the aerodynamic performance of the transition section between solid windbreak walls and porous wind barriers deteriorates. Aerodynamic loads on trains, bridges, and wind barriers are analyzed in this study, which also examines the evolution of flow field characteristics and power spectral density (PSD) across spatial and temporal scales, based on wind tunnel tests, flow visualization tests, and computational fluid dynamics methods. The results reveal that the presence of double-sided wind barriers alters the distribution of turbulence intensity and vortex structures near the bridge–wind barriers compared to single-sided wind barriers. Additionally, double-sided wind barriers greatly increase the aerodynamic loads on trains and bridge–wind barriers compared to single-sided wind barriers. Furthermore, the peak PSD values for bridge-wind barriers with double-sided wind barriers are 1.9–4 times higher than those with single-sided wind barriers. Consequently, the single-sided wind barrier may be a more suitable choice for handling unidirectional crosswinds, considering construction costs and structural safety concerns for both the bridge and the wind barrier.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
22.90%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects. Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.
期刊最新文献
Aerodynamic characteristics of windbreak wall–wind barrier transition section along high-speed railways during strong crosswinds Numerical study on ventilation duct layout in subway stations for smoke control performance optimization Vortex induced vibration analysis of a twin-box bridge deck by means of 3D LES simulations An enhanced empirical model for moving downburst wind profiles: Integration with CFD simulations Full-scale monitoring of a telecommunication lattice tower under synoptic and thunderstorm winds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1