From pro-environmental behavior to ESG fund investing: Evidence from account-level data in China

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108271
Shuitu Qian, Hang You, Die Wan
{"title":"From pro-environmental behavior to ESG fund investing: Evidence from account-level data in China","authors":"Shuitu Qian,&nbsp;Hang You,&nbsp;Die Wan","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Utilizing the green energy collected through the “Ant Forest” project to measure investors' pro-environmental behavior (PEB), the paper finds that investors' PEB positively impacts the weighted Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) score of their mutual fund positions. Additionally, when classifying PEBs into egoistic and altruistic behaviors based on specific sources of green energy, the study reveals that altruistic PEBs have a more substantial influence than egoistic PEBs. Further analysis demonstrates that egoistic PEBs become more significantly related to ESG investing when investors face extreme weather events, poor air quality, or seek to enhance their reputation. Although ESG investing transformed from altruistic and egoistic PEBs results in negative excess returns, egoistic investors experience a significant reduction in risk through ESG fund investments. In contrast, altruistic investors are willing to pay higher costs. These findings suggest that even though altruism predominantly drives the transformation from PEB to sustainable investment, egoism can also play a role when investors seek to mitigate uncertainties, diversify their portfolios, or promote social validation. Overall, these results contribute to our understanding of the motives behind sustainable investment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 108271"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325000945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Utilizing the green energy collected through the “Ant Forest” project to measure investors' pro-environmental behavior (PEB), the paper finds that investors' PEB positively impacts the weighted Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) score of their mutual fund positions. Additionally, when classifying PEBs into egoistic and altruistic behaviors based on specific sources of green energy, the study reveals that altruistic PEBs have a more substantial influence than egoistic PEBs. Further analysis demonstrates that egoistic PEBs become more significantly related to ESG investing when investors face extreme weather events, poor air quality, or seek to enhance their reputation. Although ESG investing transformed from altruistic and egoistic PEBs results in negative excess returns, egoistic investors experience a significant reduction in risk through ESG fund investments. In contrast, altruistic investors are willing to pay higher costs. These findings suggest that even though altruism predominantly drives the transformation from PEB to sustainable investment, egoism can also play a role when investors seek to mitigate uncertainties, diversify their portfolios, or promote social validation. Overall, these results contribute to our understanding of the motives behind sustainable investment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从环保行为到ESG基金投资:来自中国账户层面数据的证据
利用“蚂蚁森林”项目收集的绿色能源来衡量投资者的亲环境行为(PEB),本文发现投资者的PEB正影响其共同基金头寸的加权环境,社会和治理(ESG)得分。此外,根据特定的绿色能源来源,将peb行为分为利己主义和利他主义,研究发现利他主义的peb比利己主义的peb具有更大的影响。进一步的分析表明,当投资者面临极端天气事件、空气质量差或寻求提高其声誉时,自私自利的peb与ESG投资的关系更为显著。虽然从利他型和自私自利型peb转变而来的ESG投资导致负超额收益,但自私自利型投资者通过ESG基金投资可以显著降低风险。相比之下,无私的投资者愿意付出更高的成本。这些发现表明,尽管利他主义主要推动了从PEB到可持续投资的转变,但当投资者寻求减轻不确定性、使投资组合多样化或促进社会认可时,利己主义也会发挥作用。总的来说,这些结果有助于我们理解可持续投资背后的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Sticky growth, sticky carbon: Bayesian joint modelling evidence on a growth-carbon lock-in in emerging economies Will hydrogen prolong the price coupling between gas and electricity? The power of digital empowerment in the process of energy low-carbon transition: Dimension decomposition and path exploration Score-driven global climate zones from 1940 to 2024: A new objective climate classification method When lenders go green, do borrowers follow? Evidence from the response of corporate green innovation to bank's sustainability commitments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1