Effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on measures of cognition and symptom scores in Chinese patients with schizophrenia

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of psychiatric research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.01.055
Xinyi Cao , Yong Liu , Yuanyu Lu , Hua Jin , Henry Sershen , John M. Davis , Chunbo Li , Robert C. Smith
{"title":"Effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on measures of cognition and symptom scores in Chinese patients with schizophrenia","authors":"Xinyi Cao ,&nbsp;Yong Liu ,&nbsp;Yuanyu Lu ,&nbsp;Hua Jin ,&nbsp;Henry Sershen ,&nbsp;John M. Davis ,&nbsp;Chunbo Li ,&nbsp;Robert C. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.01.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) may have effects on cognition and symptoms in psychiatric illness but there have been few randomized controlled studies in people with schizophrenia. We conducted a randomized sham-controlled double-blind study of 40 Hz tACS on measures of cognition and symptoms scores in 50 patients diagnosed with DSM-5 schizophrenia. tACS was delivered in 10 sessions (20 min each) over a 2-week period. Evaluations were conducted with multiple cognitive and symptom batteries after 10 sessions and at 2 weeks and 4 weeks post-treatment, and also on-line during the tACS stimulation session 1. The primary outcome measured changes in the MATRICS overall composite score. The results showed no statistically significant (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) effects of active vs. sham on improvement in any of the cognitive measures or PANSS rated positive or negative symptoms. There was a trend (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.06) for the MATRICS Domain score of verbal learning to show greater improvement of active tACS compared to sham within 1–2 days after the 10 tACS sessions. Additional trials are needed to determine the effective tACS parameters targeting cognition and symptoms of schizophrenia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"183 ","pages":"Pages 10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625000639","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) may have effects on cognition and symptoms in psychiatric illness but there have been few randomized controlled studies in people with schizophrenia. We conducted a randomized sham-controlled double-blind study of 40 Hz tACS on measures of cognition and symptoms scores in 50 patients diagnosed with DSM-5 schizophrenia. tACS was delivered in 10 sessions (20 min each) over a 2-week period. Evaluations were conducted with multiple cognitive and symptom batteries after 10 sessions and at 2 weeks and 4 weeks post-treatment, and also on-line during the tACS stimulation session 1. The primary outcome measured changes in the MATRICS overall composite score. The results showed no statistically significant (P < 0.05) effects of active vs. sham on improvement in any of the cognitive measures or PANSS rated positive or negative symptoms. There was a trend (P < 0.06) for the MATRICS Domain score of verbal learning to show greater improvement of active tACS compared to sham within 1–2 days after the 10 tACS sessions. Additional trials are needed to determine the effective tACS parameters targeting cognition and symptoms of schizophrenia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经颅交流电刺激对中国精神分裂症患者认知测量和症状评分的影响
经颅交流电刺激(tACS)可能对精神疾病患者的认知和症状有影响,但很少有针对精神分裂症患者的随机对照研究。我们对50名诊断为DSM-5精神分裂症的患者进行了一项随机、假对照双盲研究,该研究采用40hz tACS测量认知和症状评分。tACS分为10个疗程(每次20分钟),为期2周。在10个疗程后、治疗后2周和4周,以及在tACS刺激期间在线进行多重认知和症状评估1。主要结果测量了总体综合评分的变化。结果显示无统计学意义(P <;0.05)在任何认知测量或PANSS评定的阳性或阴性症状的改善上,主动治疗与假药治疗的效果。有一种趋势(P <;0.06),在10次tACS会话后的1-2天内,主动tACS与假tACS相比有更大的改善。需要更多的试验来确定针对精神分裂症认知和症状的有效tACS参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
期刊最新文献
Beyond comorbidity: bidirectional association between sleep problems and internet gaming disorder and the mediating role of resilience and emotional problems: a three-wave cohort study among Chinese adolescents Neurofeedback interventions for obsessive-compulsive and related disorders: Current evidence and future directions Treatment approach Robin: Clinical applicability of a standardised manual and smartphone app for adolescents at clinical high risk for psychosis Letter to the editor: Confounding, selection bias, and reverse causation severely limit interpretation of Auger (2025) paper examining association between abortion and mental health outcomes The effect of rTMS combined with physical exercise on people with methamphetamine use disorders: An acute experimental study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1