The tensile strength of different methods of anterior cruciate ligament graft end stitches in an animal model

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Knee Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2025.01.012
Marcin Dembski , Patryk Kawa , Jakub Tarnawski , Marcin Ceynowa , Krzysztof Żerdzicki , Paweł Kłosowski
{"title":"The tensile strength of different methods of anterior cruciate ligament graft end stitches in an animal model","authors":"Marcin Dembski ,&nbsp;Patryk Kawa ,&nbsp;Jakub Tarnawski ,&nbsp;Marcin Ceynowa ,&nbsp;Krzysztof Żerdzicki ,&nbsp;Paweł Kłosowski","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2025.01.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There are several methods for stitching graft ends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery. The tendon-suture construct should be able to withstand tensioning until the graft is stabilized with an implant.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this biomechanical study, 40 porcine lower extremity tendons ends were stitched with No. 2 suture, secured to the grips of the Zwick-Roell testing machine and tested for load at failure and type of failure (tendon v/s suture thread). The applied force was linear, the results are given in Newtons (N) as a mean. The Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test was used for statistical analysis. The following constructs were compared: a whipstitch of each tendon end individually with 3, 4, and 5 passes through the tendon, a whipstitch of both tendon ends folded together and a tendon end knot without stitching.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All specimens survived the minimum tensile load of 80 N. The load at failure for whipstitch with 3,4 and 5 passes were 175 N, 211 N and 254 N respectively. The load at failure was greater for individual whipstitch than for both ends folded together (261 N v/s 152 N). The mean load at failure for braided graft was 209 N. The braided graft slips off the tendon before failure leading to uneven strength distribution during tensioning.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Increasing number of suture passes resulted in higher load at failure. Individual tendon ends whipstitched with 5 passes was the strongest construct. All of the investigated techniques are sufficient to withstand the suggested optimal graft tension of 80 N.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"53 ","pages":"Pages 293-301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016025000109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There are several methods for stitching graft ends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery. The tendon-suture construct should be able to withstand tensioning until the graft is stabilized with an implant.

Methods

In this biomechanical study, 40 porcine lower extremity tendons ends were stitched with No. 2 suture, secured to the grips of the Zwick-Roell testing machine and tested for load at failure and type of failure (tendon v/s suture thread). The applied force was linear, the results are given in Newtons (N) as a mean. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis. The following constructs were compared: a whipstitch of each tendon end individually with 3, 4, and 5 passes through the tendon, a whipstitch of both tendon ends folded together and a tendon end knot without stitching.

Results

All specimens survived the minimum tensile load of 80 N. The load at failure for whipstitch with 3,4 and 5 passes were 175 N, 211 N and 254 N respectively. The load at failure was greater for individual whipstitch than for both ends folded together (261 N v/s 152 N). The mean load at failure for braided graft was 209 N. The braided graft slips off the tendon before failure leading to uneven strength distribution during tensioning.

Conclusion

Increasing number of suture passes resulted in higher load at failure. Individual tendon ends whipstitched with 5 passes was the strongest construct. All of the investigated techniques are sufficient to withstand the suggested optimal graft tension of 80 N.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Knee
Knee 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee. The topics covered include, but are not limited to: • Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry; • Biomechanical studies; • Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices; • Imaging and diagnostic techniques; • Pathology; • Trauma; • Surgery; • Rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Age affects the osteotomy gap filling rate after biplanar medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy without a bone graft. Novel anatomical findings of the superficial medial collateral ligament during knee flexion: Anatomical and histological findings. The degree of patella alta in newborns shows strong correlations with patellofemoral parameters and is influenced by the intrauterine position - An ultrasound-based correlation study. Similarities in the kinematics of autografts and hybrid grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Minimum 2 years of follow-up Clinical outcomes of repaired radial meniscal tears: A retrospective study with minimum 2-year follow-up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1