Side-by-side versus stent-in-stent technique for stent deployment during systemic chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction

IF 1.5 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY DEN open Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70075
Shunsuke Imamura, Kazuo Watanabe, Kanae Inoue, Tomonao Taira, Taro Shibuki, Tomoyuki Satake, Shota Yamaguchi, Mitsuhito Sasaki, Hiroshi Imaoka, Shuichi Mitsunaga, Masafumi Ikeda
{"title":"Side-by-side versus stent-in-stent technique for stent deployment during systemic chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction","authors":"Shunsuke Imamura,&nbsp;Kazuo Watanabe,&nbsp;Kanae Inoue,&nbsp;Tomonao Taira,&nbsp;Taro Shibuki,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Satake,&nbsp;Shota Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Mitsuhito Sasaki,&nbsp;Hiroshi Imaoka,&nbsp;Shuichi Mitsunaga,&nbsp;Masafumi Ikeda","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>With the improved prognosis of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) owing to advances in chemotherapy, long-term stent patency has become an important goal in patients undergoing biliary stent placement. We compared the duration of stent patency between unresectable BTC patients undergoing multi-stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction by the side-by-side (SBS) and stent-in-stent (SIS) techniques during systemic chemotherapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively evaluated the data of 62 unresectable BTC patients who underwent multi-stenting before the first or second cycle of first-line chemotherapy. Stent deployment was performed by the SBS technique in 40 patients (SBS group) and by the SIS technique in 22 patients (SIS group).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median time-to-recurrent biliary obstruction was 147 days in the SBS group and 252 days in the SIS (<i>p</i> = 0.029), being longer in the SIS group. The rates of development of early adverse events were 28% and 9% (<i>p</i> = 0.09) and the rates of development of late adverse events were 26% and 14% in the SBS and SIS groups (<i>p</i> = 0.27). The median overall survival was 480 days in the SBS group and 563 days in the SIS group (<i>p</i> = 0.92).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The duration of stent patency was shorter in the SBS group than in the SIS group; thus, the SIS technique is preferable to the SBS technique for biliary stent deployment in unresectable BTC patients during systemic chemotherapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70075","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

With the improved prognosis of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) owing to advances in chemotherapy, long-term stent patency has become an important goal in patients undergoing biliary stent placement. We compared the duration of stent patency between unresectable BTC patients undergoing multi-stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction by the side-by-side (SBS) and stent-in-stent (SIS) techniques during systemic chemotherapy.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the data of 62 unresectable BTC patients who underwent multi-stenting before the first or second cycle of first-line chemotherapy. Stent deployment was performed by the SBS technique in 40 patients (SBS group) and by the SIS technique in 22 patients (SIS group).

Results

The median time-to-recurrent biliary obstruction was 147 days in the SBS group and 252 days in the SIS (p = 0.029), being longer in the SIS group. The rates of development of early adverse events were 28% and 9% (p = 0.09) and the rates of development of late adverse events were 26% and 14% in the SBS and SIS groups (p = 0.27). The median overall survival was 480 days in the SBS group and 563 days in the SIS group (p = 0.92).

Conclusion

The duration of stent patency was shorter in the SBS group than in the SIS group; thus, the SIS technique is preferable to the SBS technique for biliary stent deployment in unresectable BTC patients during systemic chemotherapy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胆道肿瘤合并恶性肝门胆道梗阻患者全身化疗期间支架置放的并排与支架内支架技术比较
目的随着化疗技术的进步,胆道癌(BTC)患者预后的改善,支架长期通畅已成为胆道支架置入术患者的重要目标。我们比较了不可切除的BTC患者在全身化疗期间采用并排(SBS)和支架内支架(SIS)技术接受多支架治疗恶性肝门胆道梗阻的支架通畅时间。方法回顾性分析62例无法切除的BTC患者在一线化疗第一或第二周期前行多支架植入术的资料。40例患者采用SBS技术(SBS组),22例患者采用SIS技术(SIS组)。结果SBS组复发胆道梗阻的中位时间为147天,SIS组为252天(p = 0.029), SIS组更长。SBS组和SIS组早期不良事件发生率分别为28%和9% (p = 0.09),晚期不良事件发生率分别为26%和14% (p = 0.27)。SBS组中位总生存期为480天,SIS组中位总生存期为563天(p = 0.92)。结论SBS组支架通畅时间短于SIS组;因此,对于全身化疗期间无法切除的BTC患者,SIS技术比SBS技术更适合胆道支架置放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Report of Endoscopic Resection and Laparoscopic-assisted Retrieval of a Giant Brunner's Gland Hyperplasia Preoperative Diagnosis of BilIN-3 Based on Peroral Cholangioscopy Leading to Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a Patient with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Case Report Distinct Adenocarcinoma and Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Components (Suspected Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasm) Identified by Targeted Biopsy Based on Differences in Endoscopic Findings in an Esophagogastric Junction Carcinoma: A Case Report Endoscopic Removal of Superabsorbent Polymer Material Ingested From a Diaper: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Evaluation of Visibility With an Eye-tracking System: Effectiveness of Narrow-Band Imaging for Detecting Colorectal Adenoma and Serrated Lesions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1