Rachel E. Wittenberg, Elizabeth Mostofsky, Murray A. Mittleman
{"title":"Functional Status Trajectory and Survival for Adult Patients Undergoing Heart Transplantation","authors":"Rachel E. Wittenberg, Elizabeth Mostofsky, Murray A. Mittleman","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Transplantation is a critical treatment for end-stage heart disease and improves length and quality of life. We investigated predictors of functional status improvement following transplant and the association between functional status trajectory and survival.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data on 34 009 US adults who underwent heart transplant 2006–2021. Functional status was measured using the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS; 0%–100%). Linear regression with stepwise selection was used to identify predictors of KPS trajectories. Kaplan–Meier curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare survival.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Mean KPS was low at listing (47.9%) and transplant (45.6%) and increased to 85.7% and 89.2% at 1- and 5-years posttransplant. Independent predictors of KPS trajectory in the first year included hypertension, diabetes, BMI, prior tobacco, previous malignancy, age, sex, education level, insurance type, etiology of heart disease, prior cardiac surgery, “1A” waitlist priority, and hospitalization status. KPS trajectory during the waitlist period and the first year posttransplant predicted survival, independent of baseline KPS. Decrease in KPS > −30% and −30% to < 0% in the first year were associated with 5.74 (3.45–9.56) and 2.09 (1.69–2.59) times higher mortality than stable KPS after adjusting for baseline KPS and other factors. Poor KPS trajectory in the waitlist period was similarly associated with higher mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Functional status improvement is an important outcome following heart transplantation, and KPS trajectory predicts survival. Most patients achieve high KPS, but clinical and social interventions may optimize KPS trajectory for high-risk patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Transplantation is a critical treatment for end-stage heart disease and improves length and quality of life. We investigated predictors of functional status improvement following transplant and the association between functional status trajectory and survival.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data on 34 009 US adults who underwent heart transplant 2006–2021. Functional status was measured using the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS; 0%–100%). Linear regression with stepwise selection was used to identify predictors of KPS trajectories. Kaplan–Meier curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare survival.
Results
Mean KPS was low at listing (47.9%) and transplant (45.6%) and increased to 85.7% and 89.2% at 1- and 5-years posttransplant. Independent predictors of KPS trajectory in the first year included hypertension, diabetes, BMI, prior tobacco, previous malignancy, age, sex, education level, insurance type, etiology of heart disease, prior cardiac surgery, “1A” waitlist priority, and hospitalization status. KPS trajectory during the waitlist period and the first year posttransplant predicted survival, independent of baseline KPS. Decrease in KPS > −30% and −30% to < 0% in the first year were associated with 5.74 (3.45–9.56) and 2.09 (1.69–2.59) times higher mortality than stable KPS after adjusting for baseline KPS and other factors. Poor KPS trajectory in the waitlist period was similarly associated with higher mortality.
Conclusions
Functional status improvement is an important outcome following heart transplantation, and KPS trajectory predicts survival. Most patients achieve high KPS, but clinical and social interventions may optimize KPS trajectory for high-risk patients.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.