Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra-resistant and MTBDRplus-susceptible rifampicin results in people with tuberculosis: utility of FluoroType MTBDR and deep sequencing.
Yonas Ghebrekristos, Aysha Ahmed, Natalie Beylis, Sarishna Singh, Christoffel Opperman, Fahd Naufal, Megan Folkerts, David Engelthaler, Erick Auma, Rouxjeane Venter, Ghowa Booley, John Metcalfe, Robin Warren, Grant Theron
{"title":"Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra-resistant and MTBDR<i>plus-</i>susceptible rifampicin results in people with tuberculosis: utility of FluoroType MTBDR and deep sequencing.","authors":"Yonas Ghebrekristos, Aysha Ahmed, Natalie Beylis, Sarishna Singh, Christoffel Opperman, Fahd Naufal, Megan Folkerts, David Engelthaler, Erick Auma, Rouxjeane Venter, Ghowa Booley, John Metcalfe, Robin Warren, Grant Theron","doi":"10.1128/aac.01671-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra)-detected rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB) is often programmatically confirmed using MTBDR<i>plus</i>. There are limited data on discordant results, including when re-tested using newer methods, like FluoroType MTBDR (FT-MTBDR) and targeted deep sequencing. MTBDR<i>plus</i> rifampicin-susceptible isolates from people with Ultra rifampicin-resistant sputum were identified from a South African programmatic laboratory. FT-MTBDR and single molecule-overlapping reads (SMOR; <i>rpoB</i>, <i>inhA</i>, <i>katG</i>) on isolate DNA were done (SMOR was used as a reference standard). Between 1 April 2021 and 30 September 2022, 8% (109/1347) of Ultra rifampicin-resistant specimens were MTBDR<i>plus</i>-susceptible. Of 89% (97/109) isolates with a sequenceable <i>rpoB</i>, SMOR resolved most in favor of Ultra (79% [77/97]). Sputum with lower mycobacterial load was associated with Ultra false-positive resistance (46% [11/24] of \"very low\" Ultra had false resistance vs 12% [9/73; <i>P</i> = 0.0004] of ≥\"low\"), as were Ultra heteroresistance calls (all wild-type probes, ≥1 mutant probe) (62% [23/37 vs 25% 15/60] for Ultra without heteroresistance calls; <i>P</i> = 0.0003). Of the 91% (88/97) of isolates successfully tested by FT-MTBDR, 55% (48/88) were FT-MTBDR rifampicin-resistant and 45% (40/88) susceptible, translating to 69% (47/68) sensitivity and 95% (19/20) specificity. In the 91% (99/109) of isolates with <i>inhA</i> and <i>katG</i> sequenced, 62% (61/99) were SMOR isoniazid-susceptible. When Ultra and MTBDR<i>plus</i> rifampicin results are discordant, Ultra is more likely to be correct, and FT-MTBDR agrees more with Ultra than MTBDR<i>plus</i>; however, lower load and the Ultra heteroresistance probe pattern were risk factors for Ultra false rifampicin-resistant results. Most people with Ultra-MTBDR<i>plus</i> discordant resistance results were isoniazid-susceptible. These data have implications for drug-resistant TB diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e0167124"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01671-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra)-detected rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB) is often programmatically confirmed using MTBDRplus. There are limited data on discordant results, including when re-tested using newer methods, like FluoroType MTBDR (FT-MTBDR) and targeted deep sequencing. MTBDRplus rifampicin-susceptible isolates from people with Ultra rifampicin-resistant sputum were identified from a South African programmatic laboratory. FT-MTBDR and single molecule-overlapping reads (SMOR; rpoB, inhA, katG) on isolate DNA were done (SMOR was used as a reference standard). Between 1 April 2021 and 30 September 2022, 8% (109/1347) of Ultra rifampicin-resistant specimens were MTBDRplus-susceptible. Of 89% (97/109) isolates with a sequenceable rpoB, SMOR resolved most in favor of Ultra (79% [77/97]). Sputum with lower mycobacterial load was associated with Ultra false-positive resistance (46% [11/24] of "very low" Ultra had false resistance vs 12% [9/73; P = 0.0004] of ≥"low"), as were Ultra heteroresistance calls (all wild-type probes, ≥1 mutant probe) (62% [23/37 vs 25% 15/60] for Ultra without heteroresistance calls; P = 0.0003). Of the 91% (88/97) of isolates successfully tested by FT-MTBDR, 55% (48/88) were FT-MTBDR rifampicin-resistant and 45% (40/88) susceptible, translating to 69% (47/68) sensitivity and 95% (19/20) specificity. In the 91% (99/109) of isolates with inhA and katG sequenced, 62% (61/99) were SMOR isoniazid-susceptible. When Ultra and MTBDRplus rifampicin results are discordant, Ultra is more likely to be correct, and FT-MTBDR agrees more with Ultra than MTBDRplus; however, lower load and the Ultra heteroresistance probe pattern were risk factors for Ultra false rifampicin-resistant results. Most people with Ultra-MTBDRplus discordant resistance results were isoniazid-susceptible. These data have implications for drug-resistant TB diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.