Effectiveness and safety of the XEN45 gel stent compared to trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma: the Gold-Standard Pathway Study.

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMJ Open Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001696
Iqbal K Ahmed, Vanessa Vera, Ingeborg Stalmans, Antonio Maria Fea, Kaweh Mansouri, Xuemin Gu, Earl Randy Craven, Herbert A Reitsamer
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of the XEN45 gel stent compared to trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma: the Gold-Standard Pathway Study.","authors":"Iqbal K Ahmed, Vanessa Vera, Ingeborg Stalmans, Antonio Maria Fea, Kaweh Mansouri, Xuemin Gu, Earl Randy Craven, Herbert A Reitsamer","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the gel stent to trabeculectomy in the Gold-Standard Pathway Study (GPS) patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the GPS, patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) poorly controlled with IOP-lowering medication were randomised (2:1, gel stent:trabeculectomy). Aggregate primary endpoint: patients (%) at month 12 achieving ≥20% IOP reduction from baseline without medication increase, clinical hypotony, vision loss to counting fingers or secondary surgical intervention (SSI). Secondary endpoints included changes in mean IOP and medication count from baseline; postoperative interventions; visual recovery; postoperative complications; and the Symptom and Health Problem Checklist (SHPC-18) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 130 eyes with POAG treated/analysed (gel stent, n=88; trabeculectomy, n=42); 61.4% and 69.0% met the primary endpoint, respectively (p=0.394). At month 12, the change from baseline in mean IOP was statistically greater post-trabeculectomy (by 2.8 mm Hg; p=0.028) than post-gel stent. Postoperative intervention and postoperative complication rates were 39.8% and 75.0% (gel stent) versus 76.2% and 92.9% (trabeculectomy), respectively. Hypotony (IOP ≤6 mm Hg at two consecutive visits) rates were 14.8% (gel stent) and 28.6% (trabeculectomy). Visual recovery was faster/better (per the mean and time to first return to baseline best corrected visual acuity) and SHPC-18-related improvements were greater post-gel stent than post-trabeculectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Similar proportions of eyes with POAG achieved the primary endpoint post-gel stent and post-trabeculectomy. The mean IOP reduction was statistically greater post-trabeculectomy. The gel stent resulted in fewer postoperative interventions, faster/better visual recovery, favourable patient-reported outcomes and fewer specific adverse events, although more SSIs and IOP elevations were observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare the gel stent to trabeculectomy in the Gold-Standard Pathway Study (GPS) patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: In the GPS, patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) poorly controlled with IOP-lowering medication were randomised (2:1, gel stent:trabeculectomy). Aggregate primary endpoint: patients (%) at month 12 achieving ≥20% IOP reduction from baseline without medication increase, clinical hypotony, vision loss to counting fingers or secondary surgical intervention (SSI). Secondary endpoints included changes in mean IOP and medication count from baseline; postoperative interventions; visual recovery; postoperative complications; and the Symptom and Health Problem Checklist (SHPC-18) questionnaire.

Results: Of 130 eyes with POAG treated/analysed (gel stent, n=88; trabeculectomy, n=42); 61.4% and 69.0% met the primary endpoint, respectively (p=0.394). At month 12, the change from baseline in mean IOP was statistically greater post-trabeculectomy (by 2.8 mm Hg; p=0.028) than post-gel stent. Postoperative intervention and postoperative complication rates were 39.8% and 75.0% (gel stent) versus 76.2% and 92.9% (trabeculectomy), respectively. Hypotony (IOP ≤6 mm Hg at two consecutive visits) rates were 14.8% (gel stent) and 28.6% (trabeculectomy). Visual recovery was faster/better (per the mean and time to first return to baseline best corrected visual acuity) and SHPC-18-related improvements were greater post-gel stent than post-trabeculectomy.

Conclusion: Similar proportions of eyes with POAG achieved the primary endpoint post-gel stent and post-trabeculectomy. The mean IOP reduction was statistically greater post-trabeculectomy. The gel stent resulted in fewer postoperative interventions, faster/better visual recovery, favourable patient-reported outcomes and fewer specific adverse events, although more SSIs and IOP elevations were observed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of dry eye disease among children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of the restrictive technique on outcomes in Baerveldt-350 implant surgery. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: comparison of Hydrus microstent with iStent inject in primary open-angle glaucoma. Real-world efficacy and safety of 8 mg aflibercept in neovascular AMD: a case series. Cataract surgery in Australia: a review of the regional literature and outcomes from 5018 cases at a tertiary teaching hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1