Protocol for a Systematic and Scoping Review of Emergent Motion Capture Technology for Upper Extremity Assessment in Stroke.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Cerebrovascular Diseases Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1159/000543914
Jarrad Fisher, Natasha A Lannin, Craig S Anderson, Xiaoying Chen
{"title":"Protocol for a Systematic and Scoping Review of Emergent Motion Capture Technology for Upper Extremity Assessment in Stroke.","authors":"Jarrad Fisher, Natasha A Lannin, Craig S Anderson, Xiaoying Chen","doi":"10.1159/000543914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant proportion of stroke survivors, ranging from 50% to 88%, experience upper limb motor impairments. Traditional upper limb assessments in clinical settings rely on subjective observations, leading to inconsistencies. Motion capture (MoCap) systems offer objective, precise assessments of kinematics. This review aims to systematically evaluate emergent MoCap technologies for upper limb assessment in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4. The review is registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF). Searches will be conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and IEEE Xplore. We will include peer-reviewed studies from 2014 to 2024, in English, focusing on adults (≥18 years) post-stroke using MoCap technologies for upper limb assessment. Two or more reviewers will independently screen, select, and extract data. A narrative synthesis will describe the evidence's quality and content.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review will enhance our understanding of MoCap technologies for upper limb assessment post-stroke, identifying strengths, limitations, and providing evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and future research. It aims to bridge the gap by capturing and analysing the latest advancements and their clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9683,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543914","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A significant proportion of stroke survivors, ranging from 50% to 88%, experience upper limb motor impairments. Traditional upper limb assessments in clinical settings rely on subjective observations, leading to inconsistencies. Motion capture (MoCap) systems offer objective, precise assessments of kinematics. This review aims to systematically evaluate emergent MoCap technologies for upper limb assessment in stroke patients.

Methods: This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4. The review is registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF). Searches will be conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and IEEE Xplore. We will include peer-reviewed studies from 2014 to 2024, in English, focusing on adults (≥18 years) post-stroke using MoCap technologies for upper limb assessment. Two or more reviewers will independently screen, select, and extract data. A narrative synthesis will describe the evidence's quality and content.

Discussion: This review will enhance our understanding of MoCap technologies for upper limb assessment post-stroke, identifying strengths, limitations, and providing evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and future research. It aims to bridge the gap by capturing and analysing the latest advancements and their clinical applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Cerebrovascular Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: A rapidly-growing field, stroke and cerebrovascular research is unique in that it involves a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. ''Cerebrovascular Diseases'' is an international forum which meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues, dealing with all aspects of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. It contains original contributions, reviews of selected topics and clinical investigative studies, recent meeting reports and work-in-progress as well as discussions on controversial issues. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears if directly relevant to clinical issues.
期刊最新文献
A nationwide prospective registry of endovascular thrombectomy for extra-large ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (XL STROKE): rationale and design. Effect of Acupuncture on Dysphagia After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. The prediction of hematoma growth in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: from 2-dimensional shape to 3-dimensional morphology. Bridging Thrombolysis versus Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in acute Basilar artery occlusion due to different stroke etiologies. Detecting atrial fibrillation by artificial intelligence enabled neuroimaging examination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1