Integrated double redo percutaneous valve replacement: simultaneous transcatheter aortic and mitral valve management.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezaf023
Hristian Hinkov, Chong Bin Lee, Dustin Greve, Christoph Klein, Marian Kukucka, Jörg Kempfert, Stephan Jacobs, Volkmar Falk, Henryk Dreger, Axel Unbehaun
{"title":"Integrated double redo percutaneous valve replacement: simultaneous transcatheter aortic and mitral valve management.","authors":"Hristian Hinkov, Chong Bin Lee, Dustin Greve, Christoph Klein, Marian Kukucka, Jörg Kempfert, Stephan Jacobs, Volkmar Falk, Henryk Dreger, Axel Unbehaun","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The growing elderly population contributes to an increasing prevalence of severe degenerative native aortic valve (AV) or mitral valve (MV) disease in combination with bio-prosthetic valve failure of prior implanted (aortic or mitral) bio-prostheses, as well as concomitant failure of both aortic and mitral bio-prosthetic valves. A combined surgical AV and MV replacement carries a markedly higher risk, especially in the redo setting. Transcatheter double-valve implantation (TDVI) is emerging as a promising alternative that may mitigate the risks of redo surgery. The evidence for TDVI is very limited. This study aims to address the current gap in the literature by analysing a large institutional series of single-stage TDVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-centre retrospective analysis of all patients (n = 13) undergoing simultaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) from October 2018 until April 2024. Primary end-points were Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) and Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) technical success, 30-day device success and early safety (MVARC procedural success). Secondary end-points included echocardiographic TDVI performance, adverse events, symptom change and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of patients was 77 years, with 7/13 (53.8%) females. Median EuroSCORE II was 16.9%. All patients presented with structural valve degeneration with severe haemodynamic valve deterioration according to the VARC-3 definition. Procedural outcomes showed 100% technical success. There was absence of 30-day mortality (0%). Thirty-day device success and early safety/MVARC procedural success were 100%. No major adverse events occurred. After TDVI, the median New York Heart Association functional class improved from III to II.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TDVI appears to be a safe and effective alternative to surgical redo double-valve replacement for selected patients. Our findings support the feasibility of TDVI with excellent early outcomes. Further prospective multicentre studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate the long-term effects and to establish TDVI as a guideline consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":11938,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The growing elderly population contributes to an increasing prevalence of severe degenerative native aortic valve (AV) or mitral valve (MV) disease in combination with bio-prosthetic valve failure of prior implanted (aortic or mitral) bio-prostheses, as well as concomitant failure of both aortic and mitral bio-prosthetic valves. A combined surgical AV and MV replacement carries a markedly higher risk, especially in the redo setting. Transcatheter double-valve implantation (TDVI) is emerging as a promising alternative that may mitigate the risks of redo surgery. The evidence for TDVI is very limited. This study aims to address the current gap in the literature by analysing a large institutional series of single-stage TDVI.

Methods: Single-centre retrospective analysis of all patients (n = 13) undergoing simultaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) from October 2018 until April 2024. Primary end-points were Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) and Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) technical success, 30-day device success and early safety (MVARC procedural success). Secondary end-points included echocardiographic TDVI performance, adverse events, symptom change and survival.

Results: The median age of patients was 77 years, with 7/13 (53.8%) females. Median EuroSCORE II was 16.9%. All patients presented with structural valve degeneration with severe haemodynamic valve deterioration according to the VARC-3 definition. Procedural outcomes showed 100% technical success. There was absence of 30-day mortality (0%). Thirty-day device success and early safety/MVARC procedural success were 100%. No major adverse events occurred. After TDVI, the median New York Heart Association functional class improved from III to II.

Conclusions: TDVI appears to be a safe and effective alternative to surgical redo double-valve replacement for selected patients. Our findings support the feasibility of TDVI with excellent early outcomes. Further prospective multicentre studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate the long-term effects and to establish TDVI as a guideline consideration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合双重做经皮瓣膜置换术:同时经导管主动脉瓣和二尖瓣管理。
目的:老年人口的增长导致严重退行性原生主动脉瓣(AV)或二尖瓣(MV)疾病的患病率增加,并合并先前植入的生物假体(主动脉或二尖瓣)的生物假体瓣膜衰竭,以及主动脉和二尖瓣生物假体瓣膜同时衰竭。联合手术房室和中房置换术的风险明显更高,特别是在重做时。经导管双瓣膜植入术(TDVI)是一种很有前途的替代方法,可以降低重做手术的风险。TDVI的证据非常有限。本研究旨在通过分析大型机构系列单阶段TDVI来解决当前文献中的空白。方法:对2018年10月至2024年4月期间同时行经导管主动脉瓣置入术(TAVI)和经导管二尖瓣置入术(TMVI)的患者(n = 13)进行单中心回顾性分析。主要终点是瓣膜学术研究联盟-3 (VARC-3)和二尖瓣学术研究联盟(MVARC)的技术成功、30天器械成功和早期安全性(MVARC手术成功)。次要终点包括超声心动图TDVI表现、不良事件、症状改变和生存。结果:患者中位年龄为77岁,其中7/13(53.8%)为女性。中位EuroSCORE II为16.9%。根据VARC-3定义,所有患者均表现为结构性瓣膜变性(SVD)伴严重血流动力学瓣膜畸变。手术结果显示100%的技术成功。无30天死亡率(0%)。30天器械成功率和早期安全性/MVARC手术成功率均为100%。未发生重大不良事件。TDVI后,NYHA功能分级中位数由III级提高至II级。结论:TDVI似乎是一种安全有效的替代手术重做双瓣膜置换术的选择。我们的研究结果支持TDVI的可行性和良好的早期预后。进一步的前瞻性多中心研究需要更大的队列来验证长期效果,并将TDVI作为指导考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
564
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The primary aim of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is to provide a medium for the publication of high-quality original scientific reports documenting progress in cardiac and thoracic surgery. The journal publishes reports of significant clinical and experimental advances related to surgery of the heart, the great vessels and the chest. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is an international journal and accepts submissions from all regions. The journal is supported by a number of leading European societies.
期刊最新文献
Long-term survival from a randomized controlled trial of lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer. Ventricular switch procedure: updated outcomes and lessons learned. Prevalence and anatomical characteristics of the left medial basal pulmonary segment: a retrospective cohort study using three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction. Randomized Trials in Cardiac Surgery: Why and How. Sex difference in aortic root replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis†.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1