Cost-effectiveness of apixaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) based on effectiveness data from a Spanish study in clinical practice (real-world evidence).

IF 1.8 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1080/14779072.2025.2464180
Manuel Anguita, Francisco Marín, Javier Soto, Susana Fernández de Cabo, Darío Rubio-Rodríguez, Carlos Rubio-Terrés
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of apixaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) based on effectiveness data from a Spanish study in clinical practice (real-world evidence).","authors":"Manuel Anguita, Francisco Marín, Javier Soto, Susana Fernández de Cabo, Darío Rubio-Rodríguez, Carlos Rubio-Terrés","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2464180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the cost-effectiveness of apixaban in the prevention ofstroke in adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), comparedto other direct-acting oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban)and the vitamin K antagonist acenocoumarol, based on data on effectiveness inclinical practice in Spain obtained in the FANTASIIA study.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A probabilistic Markov economic model (second-order Monte Carlosimulation) was performed to analyze the costs and utilities (quality-adjustedlife years, QALYs) associated with the compared treatments, according to thedifferent probabilities of stroke, major bleeding and death observed inFANTASIIA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cost per QALY gained in the patient treated with apixabanversus comparators ranged from €2,919 to €7,462. The probability of apixabanbeing cost-effective ranges from 91.1% (vs dabigatran 150 mg), 97.8% (vsdabigatran 110 mg), and 100% (vs. rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and acenocoumarol).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the results of the FANTASIIA study, apixaban is acost-effective treatment (below a willingness to pay of €25,000 per QALYgained) compared to dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and acenocoumarol intreating patients with NVAF.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2025.2464180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of apixaban in the prevention ofstroke in adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), comparedto other direct-acting oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban)and the vitamin K antagonist acenocoumarol, based on data on effectiveness inclinical practice in Spain obtained in the FANTASIIA study.

Research design and methods: A probabilistic Markov economic model (second-order Monte Carlosimulation) was performed to analyze the costs and utilities (quality-adjustedlife years, QALYs) associated with the compared treatments, according to thedifferent probabilities of stroke, major bleeding and death observed inFANTASIIA.

Results: The cost per QALY gained in the patient treated with apixabanversus comparators ranged from €2,919 to €7,462. The probability of apixabanbeing cost-effective ranges from 91.1% (vs dabigatran 150 mg), 97.8% (vsdabigatran 110 mg), and 100% (vs. rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and acenocoumarol).

Conclusions: Based on the results of the FANTASIIA study, apixaban is acost-effective treatment (below a willingness to pay of €25,000 per QALYgained) compared to dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and acenocoumarol intreating patients with NVAF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (ISSN 1477-9072) provides expert reviews on the clinical applications of new medicines, therapeutic agents and diagnostics in cardiovascular disease. Coverage includes drug therapy, heart disease, vascular disorders, hypertension, cholesterol in cardiovascular disease, heart disease, stroke, heart failure and cardiovascular surgery. The Expert Review format is unique. Each review provides a complete overview of current thinking in a key area of research or clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Temporal trends in cardiovascular mortality among patients with hematological malignancies: a 20-year perspective. The gut microbiota and its role in the development of cardiovascular disease. Is transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy heading towards losing its rare disease classification? Evolocumab for the reduction of cardiovascular risk in HIV patients: is this a clinician's best option for HIV patients? Cost-effectiveness of apixaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) based on effectiveness data from a Spanish study in clinical practice (real-world evidence).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1