Trazodone effectiveness in depression: impacts of trazodone extended release vs SSRIs on the health status and quality of life of patients with major depressive disorder.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Frontiers in Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-01-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphar.2024.1525498
Marcin Siwek, Adrian Andrzej Chrobak, Anna Julia Krupa, Aleksandra Gorostowicz, Andrzej Juryk, Dominika Dudek
{"title":"Trazodone effectiveness in depression: impacts of trazodone extended release vs SSRIs on the health status and quality of life of patients with major depressive disorder.","authors":"Marcin Siwek, Adrian Andrzej Chrobak, Anna Julia Krupa, Aleksandra Gorostowicz, Andrzej Juryk, Dominika Dudek","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2024.1525498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early research on the pharmacotherapy for major depressive disorder (MDD) has largely focused on symptomatic improvements, whereas this focus has shifted to functioning and quality of life in recent years. Studies have confirmed that antidepressants generally improve the functional outcomes in MDD, but very few works have compared the efficacies of specific drugs. The present work aims to compare the impacts of trazodone once-a-day extended-release (XR) vs selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on the health status and quality of life in MDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were gathered from 180 subjects through a naturalistic observation study of trazodone effectiveness in depression (TED) and analyzed. The TED study participants received trazodone XR of SSRIs in flexible doses for 12 weeks. The health status and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were evaluated using the EQ-5D-5L tool at baseline as well as 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the subjects treated with trazodone XR vs SSRIs presented similar health status profiles and HRQoL values with respect to the mobility, self-care, and anxiety/depression dimensions along with lower scores for the usual activities, pain/discomfort, overall HRQoL, and health status. Both trazodone XR and SSRIs improved the health status and HRQoL of the MDD patients at all subsequent timepoints. Compared to SSRIs, trazodone XR provided greater improvements in terms of the self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression measures and more often improved participant overall health status and HRQoL. More participants reported mixed changes in their health status and HRQoL in the SSRI group than the trazodone XR group.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Health status and HRQoL improved in both treatment arms, with preferable scores in trazodone XR vs. SSRIs group.</p>","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1525498"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1525498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Early research on the pharmacotherapy for major depressive disorder (MDD) has largely focused on symptomatic improvements, whereas this focus has shifted to functioning and quality of life in recent years. Studies have confirmed that antidepressants generally improve the functional outcomes in MDD, but very few works have compared the efficacies of specific drugs. The present work aims to compare the impacts of trazodone once-a-day extended-release (XR) vs selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on the health status and quality of life in MDD.

Methods: Data were gathered from 180 subjects through a naturalistic observation study of trazodone effectiveness in depression (TED) and analyzed. The TED study participants received trazodone XR of SSRIs in flexible doses for 12 weeks. The health status and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were evaluated using the EQ-5D-5L tool at baseline as well as 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

Results: At baseline, the subjects treated with trazodone XR vs SSRIs presented similar health status profiles and HRQoL values with respect to the mobility, self-care, and anxiety/depression dimensions along with lower scores for the usual activities, pain/discomfort, overall HRQoL, and health status. Both trazodone XR and SSRIs improved the health status and HRQoL of the MDD patients at all subsequent timepoints. Compared to SSRIs, trazodone XR provided greater improvements in terms of the self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression measures and more often improved participant overall health status and HRQoL. More participants reported mixed changes in their health status and HRQoL in the SSRI group than the trazodone XR group.

Discussion: Health status and HRQoL improved in both treatment arms, with preferable scores in trazodone XR vs. SSRIs group.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
曲唑酮对抑郁症的疗效:曲唑酮缓释与SSRIs对重度抑郁症患者健康状况和生活质量的影响
早期关于重度抑郁障碍(MDD)药物治疗的研究主要集中在症状改善上,而近年来,这一重点已转移到功能和生活质量上。研究证实,抗抑郁药通常能改善重度抑郁症的功能结果,但很少有研究比较特定药物的疗效。本研究旨在比较曲唑酮每日一次缓释(XR)与选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)对重度抑郁症患者健康状况和生活质量的影响。方法:通过曲唑酮治疗抑郁症(TED)的自然观察研究,收集180名受试者的资料并进行分析。TED研究参与者接受灵活剂量的曲唑酮XR SSRIs治疗12周。在基线以及2、4、8和12周时使用EQ-5D-5L工具评估健康状况和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。结果:在基线时,曲唑酮XR与SSRIs治疗的受试者在流动性、自我保健和焦虑/抑郁维度方面表现出相似的健康状况概况和HRQoL值,而在日常活动、疼痛/不适、总体HRQoL和健康状况方面得分较低。曲唑酮XR和SSRIs在所有后续时间点均改善了MDD患者的健康状况和HRQoL。与SSRIs相比,曲唑酮XR在自我护理、日常活动、疼痛/不适和焦虑/抑郁测量方面提供了更大的改善,并且更经常改善参与者的整体健康状况和HRQoL。与曲唑酮XR组相比,SSRI组更多的参与者报告了他们的健康状况和HRQoL的混合变化。讨论:两个治疗组的健康状况和HRQoL均有改善,曲唑酮XR组优于SSRIs组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers in Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
5163
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
PLA-THF-PEG nanoparticles Co-encapsulating AV3 and KH3 for synergistic pancreatic cancer therapy via stromal remodeling and metabolic inhibition. Association of serum methylglyoxal with endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Correction: Ramulus mori (Sangzhi) alkaloids improve intestinal oxidative damage and inflammation in DHEA-induced polycystic ovary syndrome rats via gut microbiota and metabolite modulation. Estimated preventive dose of racemic ketamine for shivering and pruritus prophylaxis in cesarean delivery: a Monte Carlo simulation guided network meta-analysis. Immunotherapy-related cardiovascular toxicity: from mechanisms to management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1