Endoscopist adenoma detection rate associated with neoplasia detection during subsequent-round colonoscopy in fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of the SCREESCO randomized controlled trial

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2025.01.037
Masau Sekiguchi MD, PhD , Marcus Westerberg PhD , Christian Löwbeer MD, PhD , Anna Forsberg MD, PhD
{"title":"Endoscopist adenoma detection rate associated with neoplasia detection during subsequent-round colonoscopy in fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of the SCREESCO randomized controlled trial","authors":"Masau Sekiguchi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marcus Westerberg PhD ,&nbsp;Christian Löwbeer MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Anna Forsberg MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.01.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div><span><span><span>In colorectal cancer screening with the </span>fecal immunochemical test (FIT), the optimal follow-up after first-round </span>colonoscopy for a positive FIT, particularly after negative colonoscopy, is unknown. Therefore, using Screening of Swedish Colons (SCREESCO) study data, we aimed to elucidate the risk factors for the detection of </span>colorectal neoplasia in second-round colonoscopy, which can affect recommendations for the optimal follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a cross-sectional analysis using data from SCREESCO participants undergoing colonoscopy after a positive 2-stool FIT, with a positivity cutoff value of ≥10 μg/g feces, in both the first and second rounds separated by a 2-year interval. We assessed the associations between colorectal neoplasia detection in second-round colonoscopy and participant characteristics, FIT concentrations, first-round colonoscopy results, and endoscopists’ adenoma detection rates (ADRs), which were categorized as very low, low, intermediate, and high.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study included 343 individuals. Despite negative first-round colonoscopies (n = 230), colorectal cancer and advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) were detected in 0.9% and 8.3% of participants in the second-round colonoscopy, respectively. An association was demonstrated between the first-round endoscopists’ ADRs and the risk of second-round ACN detection. The multivariable odds ratios of the first-round intermediate and high ADRs, compared with the very low ADR, for second-round ACN detection were 0.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.79) and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.04-0.86), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The impact of endoscopists’ ADRs on ACN detection in subsequent-round colonoscopies underscores the importance of considering ADR for optimal follow-up after first-round colonoscopy in an FIT-based screening program.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"102 3","pages":"Pages 391-399"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510725000677","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

In colorectal cancer screening with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), the optimal follow-up after first-round colonoscopy for a positive FIT, particularly after negative colonoscopy, is unknown. Therefore, using Screening of Swedish Colons (SCREESCO) study data, we aimed to elucidate the risk factors for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in second-round colonoscopy, which can affect recommendations for the optimal follow-up.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional analysis using data from SCREESCO participants undergoing colonoscopy after a positive 2-stool FIT, with a positivity cutoff value of ≥10 μg/g feces, in both the first and second rounds separated by a 2-year interval. We assessed the associations between colorectal neoplasia detection in second-round colonoscopy and participant characteristics, FIT concentrations, first-round colonoscopy results, and endoscopists’ adenoma detection rates (ADRs), which were categorized as very low, low, intermediate, and high.

Results

This study included 343 individuals. Despite negative first-round colonoscopies (n = 230), colorectal cancer and advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) were detected in 0.9% and 8.3% of participants in the second-round colonoscopy, respectively. An association was demonstrated between the first-round endoscopists’ ADRs and the risk of second-round ACN detection. The multivariable odds ratios of the first-round intermediate and high ADRs, compared with the very low ADR, for second-round ACN detection were 0.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.79) and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.04-0.86), respectively.

Conclusions

The impact of endoscopists’ ADRs on ACN detection in subsequent-round colonoscopies underscores the importance of considering ADR for optimal follow-up after first-round colonoscopy in an FIT-based screening program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于粪便免疫化学测试的结直肠癌筛查中,内镜师腺瘤检出率与后续轮结肠镜检查中肿瘤检出率相关:SCREESCO随机对照试验的横断面分析
背景和目的:在使用粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)进行结直肠癌筛查时,对于FIT阳性的第一轮结肠镜检查,特别是结肠镜检查阴性的结肠镜检查后的最佳随访尚不清楚。因此,利用瑞典结肠筛查(SCREESCO)研究数据,我们旨在阐明在第二轮结肠镜检查中发现结直肠肿瘤的危险因素,这些因素可能影响最佳随访建议。方法:我们对两大便FIT阳性(阳性临界值≥10 μg/g粪便)后进行结肠镜检查的SCREESCO参与者的数据进行了横断面分析,第一轮和第二轮检查间隔两年。我们评估了第二轮结肠镜检查中结直肠肿瘤检测与参与者特征、FIT浓度、第一轮结肠镜检查结果和内窥镜医师腺瘤检出率(adr)之间的关系,adr分为极低、低、中、高。结果:本研究纳入343人。尽管第一轮结肠镜检查阴性(n=230),但在第二轮结肠镜检查中,分别有0.9%和8.3%的参与者检测到结直肠癌和晚期结直肠肿瘤(ACN)。第一轮内窥镜医师的不良反应与第二轮ACN检测的风险之间存在关联。对于第二轮ACN检测,第一轮中、高ADR与极低ADR的多变量比值比分别为0.17(95%可信区间:0.02-0.79)和0.19(95%可信区间:0.04-0.86)。讨论:内镜医师的不良反应对后续结肠镜检查中ACN检测的影响强调了在基于fit的筛查项目中,在第一轮结肠镜检查后考虑不良反应的最佳随访的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to Closure of gastric mucosal defects using the reopenable-clip over the line method to decrease the risk of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter propensity score-matched case-control study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2024;102:37-46. Response The reliability of the endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal minimally invasive surgery recovery comparison: examining indication bias, baseline imbalance, and limited statistical power Response When CT Falls Short: Role of EUS and Peroral Pancreatoscopy in Identifying Main Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm in Patients with Asymptomatic Elevated CA19-9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1