"What does 'often' even mean?" Revising and validating the Comprehensive Autistic Trait Inventory in partnership with autistic people.

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Molecular Autism Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1186/s13229-025-00643-7
Friederike Charlotte Hechler, Outi Tuomainen, Nathan Weber, Frank Fahr, Bodie Karlek, Marie Maroske, Meike Misia, Nathan Caruana
{"title":"\"What does 'often' even mean?\" Revising and validating the Comprehensive Autistic Trait Inventory in partnership with autistic people.","authors":"Friederike Charlotte Hechler, Outi Tuomainen, Nathan Weber, Frank Fahr, Bodie Karlek, Marie Maroske, Meike Misia, Nathan Caruana","doi":"10.1186/s13229-025-00643-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we revised the comprehensive autistic trait inventory (CATI)-a self-report inventory of autistic traits, in collaboration with autistic people and provided preliminary evidence for its validity as a self-report measure of autistic traits in the general population. An established strength of the CATI is its ability to capture female autistic traits. Our project aimed to extend this further, to increase the inventory's accessibility, and to minimise stigma induced by deficit-based representations of autistic experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Together with 22 individuals from the autism and autistic communities, we created the Revised Comprehensive Autistic Trait Inventory (CATI-R). Revisions included rewording items to increase clarity or reduce stigma and expanding items to capture diverse autistic experiences. We also present a series of guidelines for developing self-report inventories of subclinical neurodivergent traits. We validated the CATI-R within a large sample (n = 1439), comprising people with a self-reported autism diagnosis (n = 331), people who self-identified as autistic (n = 44), and non-autistic participants (n = 1046).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We successfully validated a revision of the CATI. A confirmatory factor analysis supported the six-subscale structure (two-factor bifactors model: Chi-squared = 2705.73, p < .001, RMSEA = .04, SRMR = .03, CFI = .95, TLI = .94). Spearman's rank correlations showed positive relationships between all subscales (all rs >  .56, ps < .001). Convergent validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between the CATI-R and two contemporary inventories of autistic traits: the AQ (rho = .86, p < .01) and BAPQ (rho = .82, p < .01). Finally, a measurement invariance analysis indicated that total-scale scores can be compared across genders.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Our study presents only initial evidence for the validity of the CATI-R that should be enriched with further analyses and types of data, including a larger number of participants who do not identify as male or female.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This project provides a revised trait inventory that resonates with actual autistic experience, along with guidelines for creating self-report measures that are sensitive, accessible, and non-stigmatising.</p>","PeriodicalId":18733,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Autism","volume":"16 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11803966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Autism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-025-00643-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In this study, we revised the comprehensive autistic trait inventory (CATI)-a self-report inventory of autistic traits, in collaboration with autistic people and provided preliminary evidence for its validity as a self-report measure of autistic traits in the general population. An established strength of the CATI is its ability to capture female autistic traits. Our project aimed to extend this further, to increase the inventory's accessibility, and to minimise stigma induced by deficit-based representations of autistic experience.

Methods: Together with 22 individuals from the autism and autistic communities, we created the Revised Comprehensive Autistic Trait Inventory (CATI-R). Revisions included rewording items to increase clarity or reduce stigma and expanding items to capture diverse autistic experiences. We also present a series of guidelines for developing self-report inventories of subclinical neurodivergent traits. We validated the CATI-R within a large sample (n = 1439), comprising people with a self-reported autism diagnosis (n = 331), people who self-identified as autistic (n = 44), and non-autistic participants (n = 1046).

Results: We successfully validated a revision of the CATI. A confirmatory factor analysis supported the six-subscale structure (two-factor bifactors model: Chi-squared = 2705.73, p < .001, RMSEA = .04, SRMR = .03, CFI = .95, TLI = .94). Spearman's rank correlations showed positive relationships between all subscales (all rs >  .56, ps < .001). Convergent validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between the CATI-R and two contemporary inventories of autistic traits: the AQ (rho = .86, p < .01) and BAPQ (rho = .82, p < .01). Finally, a measurement invariance analysis indicated that total-scale scores can be compared across genders.

Limitations: Our study presents only initial evidence for the validity of the CATI-R that should be enriched with further analyses and types of data, including a larger number of participants who do not identify as male or female.

Conclusions: This project provides a revised trait inventory that resonates with actual autistic experience, along with guidelines for creating self-report measures that are sensitive, accessible, and non-stigmatising.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“‘经常’到底是什么意思?”与自闭症患者合作修订和验证自闭症综合特征量表。
背景:在本研究中,我们与自闭症患者合作,修订了综合自闭症特征量表(CATI)——一种自闭症特征的自我报告量表,并为其作为普通人群自闭症特征的自我报告量表的有效性提供了初步证据。CATI的一个既定优势是它能够捕捉女性自闭症特征。我们的项目旨在进一步扩展这一点,增加库存的可访问性,并最大限度地减少因自闭症经历的缺陷表征而引起的耻辱。方法:对来自自闭症和自闭症社区的22名患者进行问卷调查,编制修订后的自闭症综合特征量表(CATI-R)。修订包括重新措辞项目以增加清晰度或减少污名,并扩大项目以捕捉各种自闭症经历。我们也提出了一系列的指导方针发展自我报告的亚临床神经分化特征的清单。我们在一个大样本(n = 1439)中验证了CATI-R,其中包括自报告自闭症诊断的人(n = 331),自认为自闭症的人(n = 44)和非自闭症的参与者(n = 1046)。结果:我们成功地验证了CATI的修订。验证性因子分析支持六分量表结构(双因子双因子模型:卡方= 2705.73,p .56, ps)局限性:我们的研究仅提供了CATI-R有效性的初步证据,应该通过进一步的分析和数据类型来丰富,包括大量不确定为男性或女性的参与者。结论:该项目提供了一个与实际自闭症经历相呼应的修订后的特征清单,以及创建敏感、可访问和非污名化的自我报告测量的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Autism
Molecular Autism GENETICS & HEREDITY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
44
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Autism is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes high-quality basic, translational and clinical research that has relevance to the etiology, pathobiology, or treatment of autism and related neurodevelopmental conditions. Research that includes integration across levels is encouraged. Molecular Autism publishes empirical studies, reviews, and brief communications.
期刊最新文献
Biased mental face representations of autistic children in the general population. Large-scale neural network compensation associated with camouflaging in trait autism and its potential mental health costs. Priorities for change for autistic people across Europe. Reduced inter-subject functional connectivity during movies in autism: replicability across cross-national fMRI datasets. Association of glymphatic dysfunction, free water, white matter integrity and long-term memory performance in aging autistic adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1