Identification of a mepR mutation associated with tigecycline resistance in a clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolate.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1093/jac/dkaf034
Hongjie Xing, Likuan Zhang, Chenglong Li, Stefan Schwarz, Dexi Li, Xiang-Dang Du
{"title":"Identification of a mepR mutation associated with tigecycline resistance in a clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolate.","authors":"Hongjie Xing, Likuan Zhang, Chenglong Li, Stefan Schwarz, Dexi Li, Xiang-Dang Du","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the role and function of mepR variants in conferring resistance to tigecycline in clinical Staphylococcus aureus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The identification of the mepR and mepA variants in S. aureus DMB26a was performed by whole-genome sequencing and Blast alignment. The effects of the mepRD and mepAD variants of DMB26a on tigecycline susceptibility were evaluated through deletion and complementation analyses, as well as the determination of gene expression levels by RT-qPCR. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for DMB26a and its mutants were determined by antimicrobial susceptibility testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A mepR variant, designated mepRD, and a mepA variant, designated mepAD, were identified in the clinical tigecycline-resistant S. aureus isolate DMB26a, which showed 78.72% and 84.92% amino acid identity to the MepR and MepA proteins of S. aureus NCTC 8325-4, respectively. Our findings revealed that deletion of mepA in the tigecycline-susceptible S. aureus RN4220 did not lead to a decrease in the MIC of tigecycline, and that there was also no change in the tigecycline MIC after the complementation with mepAD. Furthermore, we constructed a mepR + mepA deletion strain of S. aureus RN4220 and complemented it with mepRD + mepAD. In that case, a 4-fold increase in the tigecycline MIC was observed in S. aureus RN4220ΔmepR + mepA-pLI50_mepRD + mepAD compared with S. aureus RN4220ΔmepR + mepA. In addition, the relative expression of mepAD was increased 6-fold under the regulation of mepRD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides the identification of a mepR variant contributing indirectly to tigecycline resistance via mediating increased expression of mepA in a clinical S. aureus isolate.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the role and function of mepR variants in conferring resistance to tigecycline in clinical Staphylococcus aureus.

Methods: The identification of the mepR and mepA variants in S. aureus DMB26a was performed by whole-genome sequencing and Blast alignment. The effects of the mepRD and mepAD variants of DMB26a on tigecycline susceptibility were evaluated through deletion and complementation analyses, as well as the determination of gene expression levels by RT-qPCR. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for DMB26a and its mutants were determined by antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Results: A mepR variant, designated mepRD, and a mepA variant, designated mepAD, were identified in the clinical tigecycline-resistant S. aureus isolate DMB26a, which showed 78.72% and 84.92% amino acid identity to the MepR and MepA proteins of S. aureus NCTC 8325-4, respectively. Our findings revealed that deletion of mepA in the tigecycline-susceptible S. aureus RN4220 did not lead to a decrease in the MIC of tigecycline, and that there was also no change in the tigecycline MIC after the complementation with mepAD. Furthermore, we constructed a mepR + mepA deletion strain of S. aureus RN4220 and complemented it with mepRD + mepAD. In that case, a 4-fold increase in the tigecycline MIC was observed in S. aureus RN4220ΔmepR + mepA-pLI50_mepRD + mepAD compared with S. aureus RN4220ΔmepR + mepA. In addition, the relative expression of mepAD was increased 6-fold under the regulation of mepRD.

Conclusions: This study provides the identification of a mepR variant contributing indirectly to tigecycline resistance via mediating increased expression of mepA in a clinical S. aureus isolate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
期刊最新文献
Simulated exposures of oritavancin in in vitro pharmacodynamic models select for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to oritavancin but minimal cross-resistance or seesaw effect with other antimicrobials. Real-world efficacy and tolerability of CAB+RPV LA in women: addressing the gender gap in HIV treatment research. Durability of doravirine/dolutegravir dual combination in a multicentre cohort of elderly people with HIV. Estimating the herd effects of antimicrobial prevention interventions on ventilator-associated pneumonia within ICU populations: a cluster randomized trial emulation using data from Cochrane reviews. Performance evaluation of a fully automated deep sequencing platform for hepatitis B genotyping and resistance testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1