Individual differences in affect during suicidal and nonsuicidal states among military personnel and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1037/tra0001858
Craig J Bryan, Melanie L Bozzay, AnnaBelle O Bryan, Jaryd Hiser, Ennio Ammendola, Christina Rose Bauder, Justin C Baker, Samantha E Daruwala, Lauren R Khazem
{"title":"Individual differences in affect during suicidal and nonsuicidal states among military personnel and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).","authors":"Craig J Bryan, Melanie L Bozzay, AnnaBelle O Bryan, Jaryd Hiser, Ennio Ammendola, Christina Rose Bauder, Justin C Baker, Samantha E Daruwala, Lauren R Khazem","doi":"10.1037/tra0001858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined individual differences in affect during nonsuicidal and suicidal states among 116 military personnel and veterans diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Current affect and suicidal ideation were assessed four times per day for 14 consecutive days via ecological momentary assessment using the Positive and Negative Affect Scale-Short Form and Scale for Suicidal Ideation (SSI) items. Positive and Negative Affect Scale-Short Form items were used to create four affect states based on the circumplex model of core affect: pleasant activation (e.g., excited), activated pleasure (e.g., proud), unpleasant activation (e.g., aroused), and activated displeasure (e.g., anxious). Mixed-effects regression modeling was used to assess variability in mean affect scores across active (SSI Item 4) and passive (SSI Item 5) suicidal states and variability in the correlation between affect and severity of suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean pleasant activation, <i>F</i>(2,7) = 4.8, <i>p</i> = .043, and activated pleasure, <i>F</i>(2, 5) = 22.0, <i>p</i> = .003, were significantly lower during active suicidal versus nonsuicidal states. Mean unpleasant activation, <i>F</i>(2, 7) = 19.9, <i>p</i> = .001, and activated displeasure, <i>F</i>(2, 9) = 42.3, <i>p</i> < .001, were higher during active suicidal versus nonsuicidal states. Activated pleasure was less variable, <i>χ</i>²(1) = 6.3, <i>p</i> = .012, but unpleasant activation, <i>χ</i>²(1) = 8.0, <i>p</i> = .005, and activated displeasure were more variable, <i>χ</i>²(2) = 15.7, <i>p</i> < .001, during active suicidal versus nonsuicidal states. Severity of suicidal ideation was significantly correlated with all four affect states; all correlations varied significantly across participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reported affect during suicidal states varies across military personnel and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder, suggesting suicidal states are heterogeneous. Differentiating affective arousal from affective valence can provide more nuanced understandings of suicide risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001858","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examined individual differences in affect during nonsuicidal and suicidal states among 116 military personnel and veterans diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder.

Method: Current affect and suicidal ideation were assessed four times per day for 14 consecutive days via ecological momentary assessment using the Positive and Negative Affect Scale-Short Form and Scale for Suicidal Ideation (SSI) items. Positive and Negative Affect Scale-Short Form items were used to create four affect states based on the circumplex model of core affect: pleasant activation (e.g., excited), activated pleasure (e.g., proud), unpleasant activation (e.g., aroused), and activated displeasure (e.g., anxious). Mixed-effects regression modeling was used to assess variability in mean affect scores across active (SSI Item 4) and passive (SSI Item 5) suicidal states and variability in the correlation between affect and severity of suicidal ideation.

Results: Mean pleasant activation, F(2,7) = 4.8, p = .043, and activated pleasure, F(2, 5) = 22.0, p = .003, were significantly lower during active suicidal versus nonsuicidal states. Mean unpleasant activation, F(2, 7) = 19.9, p = .001, and activated displeasure, F(2, 9) = 42.3, p < .001, were higher during active suicidal versus nonsuicidal states. Activated pleasure was less variable, χ²(1) = 6.3, p = .012, but unpleasant activation, χ²(1) = 8.0, p = .005, and activated displeasure were more variable, χ²(2) = 15.7, p < .001, during active suicidal versus nonsuicidal states. Severity of suicidal ideation was significantly correlated with all four affect states; all correlations varied significantly across participants.

Conclusion: Reported affect during suicidal states varies across military personnel and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder, suggesting suicidal states are heterogeneous. Differentiating affective arousal from affective valence can provide more nuanced understandings of suicide risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
期刊最新文献
Five-year stability patterns of meaning in life among survivors and bereaved family members of the Sewol ferry disaster. History of childhood maltreatment and online harm: A rapid review of research. Intergenerational trauma, parenting, and child behavior among African American families living in poverty. Impact of self-reported cannabis use on veterans' intensive PTSD treatment outcomes. Is trauma isolating, or does isolation traumatize? Loneliness and posttraumatic stress mutually reinforce one another in the aftermath of environmental disaster.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1