Individual differences in affect during suicidal and nonsuicidal states among military personnel and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1037/tra0001858
Craig J Bryan, Melanie L Bozzay, AnnaBelle O Bryan, Jaryd Hiser, Ennio Ammendola, Christina Rose Bauder, Justin C Baker, Samantha E Daruwala, Lauren R Khazem
{"title":"Individual differences in affect during suicidal and nonsuicidal states among military personnel and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).","authors":"Craig J Bryan, Melanie L Bozzay, AnnaBelle O Bryan, Jaryd Hiser, Ennio Ammendola, Christina Rose Bauder, Justin C Baker, Samantha E Daruwala, Lauren R Khazem","doi":"10.1037/tra0001858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined individual differences in affect during nonsuicidal and suicidal states among 116 military personnel and veterans diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Current affect and suicidal ideation were assessed four times per day for 14 consecutive days via ecological momentary assessment using the Positive and Negative Affect Scale-Short Form and Scale for Suicidal Ideation (SSI) items. Positive and Negative Affect Scale-Short Form items were used to create four affect states based on the circumplex model of core affect: pleasant activation (e.g., excited), activated pleasure (e.g., proud), unpleasant activation (e.g., aroused), and activated displeasure (e.g., anxious). Mixed-effects regression modeling was used to assess variability in mean affect scores across active (SSI Item 4) and passive (SSI Item 5) suicidal states and variability in the correlation between affect and severity of suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean pleasant activation, <i>F</i>(2,7) = 4.8, <i>p</i> = .043, and activated pleasure, <i>F</i>(2, 5) = 22.0, <i>p</i> = .003, were significantly lower during active suicidal versus nonsuicidal states. Mean unpleasant activation, <i>F</i>(2, 7) = 19.9, <i>p</i> = .001, and activated displeasure, <i>F</i>(2, 9) = 42.3, <i>p</i> < .001, were higher during active suicidal versus nonsuicidal states. Activated pleasure was less variable, <i>χ</i>²(1) = 6.3, <i>p</i> = .012, but unpleasant activation, <i>χ</i>²(1) = 8.0, <i>p</i> = .005, and activated displeasure were more variable, <i>χ</i>²(2) = 15.7, <i>p</i> < .001, during active suicidal versus nonsuicidal states. Severity of suicidal ideation was significantly correlated with all four affect states; all correlations varied significantly across participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reported affect during suicidal states varies across military personnel and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder, suggesting suicidal states are heterogeneous. Differentiating affective arousal from affective valence can provide more nuanced understandings of suicide risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":"577-586"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001858","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examined individual differences in affect during nonsuicidal and suicidal states among 116 military personnel and veterans diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder.

Method: Current affect and suicidal ideation were assessed four times per day for 14 consecutive days via ecological momentary assessment using the Positive and Negative Affect Scale-Short Form and Scale for Suicidal Ideation (SSI) items. Positive and Negative Affect Scale-Short Form items were used to create four affect states based on the circumplex model of core affect: pleasant activation (e.g., excited), activated pleasure (e.g., proud), unpleasant activation (e.g., aroused), and activated displeasure (e.g., anxious). Mixed-effects regression modeling was used to assess variability in mean affect scores across active (SSI Item 4) and passive (SSI Item 5) suicidal states and variability in the correlation between affect and severity of suicidal ideation.

Results: Mean pleasant activation, F(2,7) = 4.8, p = .043, and activated pleasure, F(2, 5) = 22.0, p = .003, were significantly lower during active suicidal versus nonsuicidal states. Mean unpleasant activation, F(2, 7) = 19.9, p = .001, and activated displeasure, F(2, 9) = 42.3, p < .001, were higher during active suicidal versus nonsuicidal states. Activated pleasure was less variable, χ²(1) = 6.3, p = .012, but unpleasant activation, χ²(1) = 8.0, p = .005, and activated displeasure were more variable, χ²(2) = 15.7, p < .001, during active suicidal versus nonsuicidal states. Severity of suicidal ideation was significantly correlated with all four affect states; all correlations varied significantly across participants.

Conclusion: Reported affect during suicidal states varies across military personnel and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder, suggesting suicidal states are heterogeneous. Differentiating affective arousal from affective valence can provide more nuanced understandings of suicide risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军人和退伍军人创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)自杀和非自杀状态下情绪的个体差异。
目的:研究116名创伤后应激障碍军人和退伍军人在非自杀和有自杀倾向状态下情绪的个体差异。方法:采用《积极和消极影响量表-简易自杀意念量表》(SSI)项目进行生态瞬间评估,每天4次,连续14天对当前情绪和自杀意念进行评估。积极和消极情绪量表-短表条目基于核心情绪的循环模型,分别产生愉快激活(如兴奋)、激活愉悦(如自豪)、不愉快激活(如兴奋)和激活不悦(如焦虑)四种情绪状态。采用混合效应回归模型评估主动(SSI第4项)和被动(SSI第5项)自杀状态平均影响得分的变异性,以及影响与自杀意念严重程度之间相关性的变异性。结果:平均愉快激活,F(2,7) = 4.8, p = 0.043,激活愉悦,F(2,5) = 22.0, p = 0.003,在主动自杀状态与非自杀状态相比显著降低。平均不愉快激活,F(2,7) = 19.9, p = .001,激活不愉快,F(2,9) = 42.3, p < .001,在主动自杀状态比非自杀状态更高。在主动自杀和非自杀状态中,激活的愉悦变化较小,χ²(1)= 6.3,p = 0.012,但不愉快激活,χ²(1)= 8.0,p = 0.005,激活的不愉悦变化较大,χ²(2)= 15.7,p < 0.001。自杀意念严重程度与四种情绪状态均显著相关;所有相关性在参与者之间都有显著差异。结论:军人和退伍军人创伤后应激障碍患者在自杀状态下的影响存在差异,表明自杀状态具有异质性。区分情感唤醒和情感效价可以提供对自杀风险更细微的理解。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the impact: Childhood sexual abuse and dissociation among Lithuanian young adults. The bidirectional relationship between PTSD and psychosis. A conceptual review of phenomenological links between trauma and the content of psychotic symptoms. A pilot study of stellate ganglion block paired with exposure therapy: Feasibility and acceptability in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Reductions in PTSD severity precede reductions in pain intensity among veterans receiving intensive treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1