Efficacy and safety of laquinimod versus placebo in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Journal of International Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1177/03000605241311437
Malik Waleed Zeb Khan, Aizaz Ali, Amna Hussain, Safeena Khan, Ammara Tahir, Muhammad Haris Khan, Touba Azeem, Abdul Moeez, Arysha Monis, Aban Masaud Mian, Fazia Khattak, Moosa Ali, Jibran Ikram
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of laquinimod versus placebo in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Malik Waleed Zeb Khan, Aizaz Ali, Amna Hussain, Safeena Khan, Ammara Tahir, Muhammad Haris Khan, Touba Azeem, Abdul Moeez, Arysha Monis, Aban Masaud Mian, Fazia Khattak, Moosa Ali, Jibran Ikram","doi":"10.1177/03000605241311437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the safety and efficacy of laquinimod in treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive electronic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify suitable studies. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials including 3665 patients found that laquinimod significantly reduced the annualized relapse rate compared with placebo (mean difference = -0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.12, -0.04, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). For disability progression confirmed at 3 months, laquinimod provided a significant advantage over placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.59, 0.96, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 25%), whereas no benefit was achieved at 6 months (HR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.45, 1.06, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 66%). Laquinimod was also significantly better than placebo in maintaining a relapse-free status (risk ratio [RR] = 1.14 95% CI = 1.06, 1.22, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 10%). Laquinimod had a comparable safety profile as placebo (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.81, 1.39, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 33%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the efficacy of laquinimod in managing RRMS but necessitate careful monitoring during treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 2","pages":"3000605241311437"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605241311437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of laquinimod in treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

Methods: An extensive electronic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify suitable studies. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1.

Results: The meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials including 3665 patients found that laquinimod significantly reduced the annualized relapse rate compared with placebo (mean difference = -0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.12, -0.04, I2 = 0%). For disability progression confirmed at 3 months, laquinimod provided a significant advantage over placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.59, 0.96, I2 = 25%), whereas no benefit was achieved at 6 months (HR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.45, 1.06, I2 = 66%). Laquinimod was also significantly better than placebo in maintaining a relapse-free status (risk ratio [RR] = 1.14 95% CI = 1.06, 1.22, I2 = 10%). Laquinimod had a comparable safety profile as placebo (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.81, 1.39, I2 = 33%).

Conclusions: These findings support the efficacy of laquinimod in managing RRMS but necessitate careful monitoring during treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉喹莫德与安慰剂在复发-缓解型多发性硬化症中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
目的:探讨拉喹莫德治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)的安全性和有效性。方法:通过PubMed、Embase、Cochrane系统评价数据库和ClinicalTrials.gov进行广泛的电子检索,以确定合适的研究。使用Cochrane的偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。采用RevMan 5.4.1软件进行统计分析。结果:纳入3665例患者的4项随机对照试验荟萃分析发现,与安慰剂相比,拉喹莫德显著降低了年化复发率(平均差异= -0.08,95%可信区间[CI] = -0.12, -0.04, I2 = 0%)。对于3个月时确认的残疾进展,拉喹莫德比安慰剂有显著优势(风险比[HR] = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.59, 0.96, I2 = 25%),而在6个月时没有获益(风险比[HR] = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.45, 1.06, I2 = 66%)。拉喹莫德在维持无复发状态方面也显著优于安慰剂(风险比[RR] = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.22, I2 = 10%)。拉奎莫德的安全性与安慰剂相当(RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.81, 1.39, I2 = 33%)。结论:这些发现支持拉喹莫德治疗RRMS的有效性,但需要在治疗期间仔细监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
期刊最新文献
Lateral articular line versus extended anterolateral approach for Schatzker type II-III tibial plateau fractures. Vitamin D status in relation to lower extremity arterial plaque and diabetic foot ulcers in type 2 diabetes. The impact of and changes in the oxidative status in the post-injury period following nonpenetrating traumatic brain injuries. Retraction: Evaluation of physician experience in achieving non-perfused volume ratio of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids: a multicentre study. The role of horticultural therapy in the clinical rehabilitation of patients with depression: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1