Long-term outcomes and the possibility of repeat puncture after suture-mediated closure device for femoral vein access.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1007/s10840-025-02003-0
Akio Chikata, Takeshi Kato, Kazuo Usuda, Shuhei Fujita, Michiro Maruyama, Kanichi Otowa, Takashi Kusayama, Kenshi Hayashi, Masayuki Takamura
{"title":"Long-term outcomes and the possibility of repeat puncture after suture-mediated closure device for femoral vein access.","authors":"Akio Chikata, Takeshi Kato, Kazuo Usuda, Shuhei Fujita, Michiro Maruyama, Kanichi Otowa, Takashi Kusayama, Kenshi Hayashi, Masayuki Takamura","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02003-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term safety and reaccessibility following the use of suture-mediated vascular closure systems (SMC) for femoral vein access are not well documented. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes and feasibility of repeated femoral vein punctures after SMC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 282 patients who underwent elective catheter ablation via femoral vein access using an 8-13 Fr sheath. Patients were randomized into the pre-close or post-close groups using the ProGlide/ProStyle single-suture technique (Abbott Vascular). Duplex ultrasound evaluations were performed on day 1, day 90, and at 1 year to evaluate vascular complications. The primary and secondary endpoints included major and minor complications within 1 year. Reaccessibility was assessed in patients who required repeated procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful re-access was achieved in 21 patients (14.9%) in the pre-close group and 16 patients (11.3%) in the post-close group who underwent repeat procedures. Long-term safety was analyzed in 91 (64.5%) and 98 (69.5%) patients in the pre-close and post-close groups, respectively. The major complication rate was 2/189 (1.1%), and the minor complication rate was 28/189 (14.8%). No difference in complication rates was observed between the pre-close group (0/91, 0.0% major, 12/91, 13.2% minor) and post-close group (2/98, 2% major, 16/98, 16.3% minor), with P-values of 0.50 and 0.68, respectively. No new vascular stenosis occurred during the chronic phase in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the long-term follow-up after femoral vein access using SMC, new-onset chronic stenosis was not observed, and reaccess was possible in repeat procedures.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>UMIN000049174.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02003-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-term safety and reaccessibility following the use of suture-mediated vascular closure systems (SMC) for femoral vein access are not well documented. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes and feasibility of repeated femoral vein punctures after SMC.

Methods: We analyzed 282 patients who underwent elective catheter ablation via femoral vein access using an 8-13 Fr sheath. Patients were randomized into the pre-close or post-close groups using the ProGlide/ProStyle single-suture technique (Abbott Vascular). Duplex ultrasound evaluations were performed on day 1, day 90, and at 1 year to evaluate vascular complications. The primary and secondary endpoints included major and minor complications within 1 year. Reaccessibility was assessed in patients who required repeated procedures.

Results: Successful re-access was achieved in 21 patients (14.9%) in the pre-close group and 16 patients (11.3%) in the post-close group who underwent repeat procedures. Long-term safety was analyzed in 91 (64.5%) and 98 (69.5%) patients in the pre-close and post-close groups, respectively. The major complication rate was 2/189 (1.1%), and the minor complication rate was 28/189 (14.8%). No difference in complication rates was observed between the pre-close group (0/91, 0.0% major, 12/91, 13.2% minor) and post-close group (2/98, 2% major, 16/98, 16.3% minor), with P-values of 0.50 and 0.68, respectively. No new vascular stenosis occurred during the chronic phase in either group.

Conclusion: In the long-term follow-up after femoral vein access using SMC, new-onset chronic stenosis was not observed, and reaccess was possible in repeat procedures.

Clinical trial registration: UMIN000049174.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
期刊最新文献
Long-term outcomes and the possibility of repeat puncture after suture-mediated closure device for femoral vein access. Long-term outcome after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with postprocedurally unmasked sinus node disease. Posterior wall isolation with pulsed field ablation or radiofrequency ablation with vein of Marshall ethanol ablation for repeat catheter ablation of recurrent atrial fibrillation. Impact of left atrial myopathy and post-ablation remodeling on quality of life: a DECAAF II sub-analysis. Near-zero fluoroscopy workflow for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation using a variable loop, 3D-integrated circular PFA catheter (Varipulse™): initial single-center experience with the first 35 patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1