Internet-Based Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy Intervention Master Your Worries With Telephone Coaching for Anxious Finnish Children Aged 10-13 Years: A Population-Based Randomized Controlled Trial

Andre Sourander MD, PhD , Tarja Korpilahti-Leino MA , Katri Kaajalaakso MD , Terja Ristkari MNSc , Susanna Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki PhLic , Tiia Ståhlberg MD, PhD , Terhi Luntamo MD, PhD
{"title":"Internet-Based Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy Intervention Master Your Worries With Telephone Coaching for Anxious Finnish Children Aged 10-13 Years: A Population-Based Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Andre Sourander MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tarja Korpilahti-Leino MA ,&nbsp;Katri Kaajalaakso MD ,&nbsp;Terja Ristkari MNSc ,&nbsp;Susanna Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki PhLic ,&nbsp;Tiia Ståhlberg MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Terhi Luntamo MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.11.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>No previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of internet-based cognitive<strong>–</strong>behavioral therapy (ICBT) among children below age 13 years screened at the population level. This study was an open, 2 parallel<strong>–</strong>group randomized controlled trial (RCT), stratified by sex, that compared ICBT with telephone coaching vs an educational control.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Altogether 465 children (mean age = 11.5 years, SD = 1.0 years, 71.4% girls) were randomly allocated to ICBT or psychoeducation. The 10-week ICBT included weekly digital material and exercises and weekly telephone calls. Assessments comprised child and parent reports on anxiety (Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders questionnaire [SCARED]), impacts of anxiety, quality of life, comorbidity, and parental mental health assessed at baseline and at 6-month follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ICBT group yielded significantly higher improvement in primary outcomes (SCARED total scores) when compared with control group in the child reports (<em>p</em> = .04, Cohen <em>d</em> = 0.17) but not in the parent reports (<em>p</em> = .41, <em>d</em> = 0.03). The ICBT group had significantly higher improvement in several secondary measures of outcome, including child-reported SCARED generalized anxiety (<em>p</em> = .047, <em>d</em> = 0.09), separation anxiety (<em>p</em> = .004, <em>d</em> = 0.40), social anxiety (<em>p</em> = .007, <em>d</em> = 0.27), the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire total score (<em>p</em> = .002, <em>d</em> = 0.22), emotional difficulties (<em>p</em> = .02, <em>d</em> = 0.20), hyperactivity (<em>p</em> = .003, <em>d</em> = 0.19), and quality of life (<em>p</em> = .02, <em>d</em> = 0.16).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>When children were screened at the population level for anxiety and enrolled in this RCT study of ICBT combined with telephone guidance, they showed efficacy in improving anxiety and quality of life. These findings are encouraging when developing early population-based intervention strategies for childhood anxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>This randomized controlled trial compared internet-based cognitive–behavioral therapy (ICBT) with telephone coaching to an internet-based educational control (EC) among 10- to 13-year-old children (n = 465) screened for anxiety at a population level in school health care check-ups. Both ICBT and EC groups showed significant improvement in the parent and child reports between baseline and follow-up in most measures related to child anxiety, other psychopathology, daily functioning level, and quality of life, as well as parental emotional well-being. The ICBT group showed significantly better improvement when compared with the EC group in child-reported anxiety as well as on parent-reported and child-reported overall psychopathology, emotional difficulties, hyperactivity, and quality of life. Overall, the effect sizes for these relative improvements at follow-up were small.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration information</h3><div>A Randomized Controlled Study of Digitalized Cognitive-behavioral Intervention for Childhood Anxiety; <span><span>https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03310489</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":"64 11","pages":"Pages 1281-1294"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890856725000656","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

No previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of internet-based cognitivebehavioral therapy (ICBT) among children below age 13 years screened at the population level. This study was an open, 2 parallelgroup randomized controlled trial (RCT), stratified by sex, that compared ICBT with telephone coaching vs an educational control.

Method

Altogether 465 children (mean age = 11.5 years, SD = 1.0 years, 71.4% girls) were randomly allocated to ICBT or psychoeducation. The 10-week ICBT included weekly digital material and exercises and weekly telephone calls. Assessments comprised child and parent reports on anxiety (Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders questionnaire [SCARED]), impacts of anxiety, quality of life, comorbidity, and parental mental health assessed at baseline and at 6-month follow-up.

Results

The ICBT group yielded significantly higher improvement in primary outcomes (SCARED total scores) when compared with control group in the child reports (p = .04, Cohen d = 0.17) but not in the parent reports (p = .41, d = 0.03). The ICBT group had significantly higher improvement in several secondary measures of outcome, including child-reported SCARED generalized anxiety (p = .047, d = 0.09), separation anxiety (p = .004, d = 0.40), social anxiety (p = .007, d = 0.27), the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire total score (p = .002, d = 0.22), emotional difficulties (p = .02, d = 0.20), hyperactivity (p = .003, d = 0.19), and quality of life (p = .02, d = 0.16).

Conclusion

When children were screened at the population level for anxiety and enrolled in this RCT study of ICBT combined with telephone guidance, they showed efficacy in improving anxiety and quality of life. These findings are encouraging when developing early population-based intervention strategies for childhood anxiety.

Plain language summary

This randomized controlled trial compared internet-based cognitive–behavioral therapy (ICBT) with telephone coaching to an internet-based educational control (EC) among 10- to 13-year-old children (n = 465) screened for anxiety at a population level in school health care check-ups. Both ICBT and EC groups showed significant improvement in the parent and child reports between baseline and follow-up in most measures related to child anxiety, other psychopathology, daily functioning level, and quality of life, as well as parental emotional well-being. The ICBT group showed significantly better improvement when compared with the EC group in child-reported anxiety as well as on parent-reported and child-reported overall psychopathology, emotional difficulties, hyperactivity, and quality of life. Overall, the effect sizes for these relative improvements at follow-up were small.

Clinical trial registration information

A Randomized Controlled Study of Digitalized Cognitive-behavioral Intervention for Childhood Anxiety; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03310489
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于互联网的认知行为治疗干预:用电话辅导控制焦虑的芬兰10-13岁儿童:一项基于人群的随机对照试验。
目的:以前没有研究评估基于互联网的认知行为疗法(ICBT)在人群水平筛查的13岁以下儿童中的疗效。本研究是一项开放的双平行组随机对照试验,按性别分层,将ICBT与电话辅导与教育对照进行比较。方法:465名儿童(平均11.5岁,SD 1.0, 71.4%女孩)随机分为ICBT组和心理教育组。为期10周的ICBT包括每周的数字材料和练习以及每周的电话。评估包括儿童和家长关于焦虑的报告(儿童焦虑相关情绪障碍筛查问卷,SCARED),焦虑的影响,生活质量,合并症和父母心理健康的基线评估和6个月的随访。结果:与对照组相比,ICBT组在儿童报告的主要结局(惊吓总分)方面有显著提高(p=。04, Cohen的d=0.17),但在父母的报告中没有(p= 0.17)。41岁的d = 0.03)。ICBT组在几个次要结果测量中有显著更高的改善,包括儿童报告的害怕广泛性焦虑(p=。047, d=0.09)、分离焦虑(p= 0.004,d=0.40)、社交焦虑(p= 0.09)。(007, d=0.27),家长报告的优势与困难问卷总分(p=。002, d=0.22),情绪困难(p= 0.22)。02, d=0.20),多动(p= 0.20)。003, d=0.19),和生活质量(p=。02年,d = 0.16)。结论:当儿童在人群水平上进行焦虑筛查并纳入RCT研究时,ICBT结合电话指导可有效改善焦虑和生活质量。这些发现在制定儿童焦虑的早期人群干预策略时是令人鼓舞的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Cognitive Development in Offspring of Individuals Living With Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia: Opportunities for Early Identification and Support Editorial: Rising Psychotropic Medication Use Among US Youth Editorial: When Maternal Depression Matters Most: Timing, Parenting, and Child Outcomes Why Psychosis Is Not So Crazy: A Road Map to Hope and Recovery for Families and Caregivers What Helps When Children and Families Struggle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1