The Beginning of a Paradigm Shift: Increase in Perioperative Complications Following Vaginal Hysterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Using the ACS-NSQIP 2016 - 2019 Database.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of minimally invasive gynecology Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.016
Abigail Cain, Brooke Andrews, Miriam Alvarez, Jennifer Travieso, Winifred Mak, Alison Brooks-Heinzman, Zachary Chipman, Michael Breen, Marian Yvette Williams-Brown, Christina Salazar
{"title":"The Beginning of a Paradigm Shift: Increase in Perioperative Complications Following Vaginal Hysterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Using the ACS-NSQIP 2016 - 2019 Database.","authors":"Abigail Cain, Brooke Andrews, Miriam Alvarez, Jennifer Travieso, Winifred Mak, Alison Brooks-Heinzman, Zachary Chipman, Michael Breen, Marian Yvette Williams-Brown, Christina Salazar","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>In this study, we compare perioperative outcomes following laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and vaginal hysterectomy (VH) between 2016 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Study setting: </strong>National database study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS - NSQIP) database to identify patients underwent elective LH or VH between 2016 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Our primary outcome of interest was a composite incidence of perioperative complications. We generated a propensity score using a multiple logistic regression model to adjust for confounding factors and to reduce the selection bias between the two groups. We matched patients who underwent elective LH to patients who underwent elective VH on the logit of the propensity score.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Of the 76,706 women in the cohort (2016-2019), 62,124 (80.9%) underwent LH and 14,582 (19.0%) underwent VH. After propensity matching (n=8,991 per group), results in the matched cohort revealed significant differences on the primary composite outcome. The composite risk of death, complications, reoperation, and readmission was lower among patients who underwent LH compared to VH, such that the primary composite outcome occurred in 5.62% of LH patients compared to 6.65% of VH patients (relative risk (RR) 0.845, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.753 - 0.947, p = 0.004). In addition, the risk of both transfusion and readmission was higher among patients who underwent VH compared to LH (transfusion: RR 1.372, 95% CI 1.078 - 1.745, p =0.010; readmission: RR 1.546, 95% CI 1.216 - 1.966, p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have found that there is a lower 30-day composite morbidity for patients when undergoing LH compared to VH. These data demonstrate a higher risk of perioperative complications in women undergoing VH and should further inform surgeon's surgical considerations when deciding the optimal route of hysterectomy, depending on the expertise of the surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: In this study, we compare perioperative outcomes following laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and vaginal hysterectomy (VH) between 2016 and 2019.

Study design: A retrospective cohort study.

Study setting: National database study.

Patients: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS - NSQIP) database to identify patients underwent elective LH or VH between 2016 and 2019.

Interventions: Our primary outcome of interest was a composite incidence of perioperative complications. We generated a propensity score using a multiple logistic regression model to adjust for confounding factors and to reduce the selection bias between the two groups. We matched patients who underwent elective LH to patients who underwent elective VH on the logit of the propensity score.

Measurements and main results: Of the 76,706 women in the cohort (2016-2019), 62,124 (80.9%) underwent LH and 14,582 (19.0%) underwent VH. After propensity matching (n=8,991 per group), results in the matched cohort revealed significant differences on the primary composite outcome. The composite risk of death, complications, reoperation, and readmission was lower among patients who underwent LH compared to VH, such that the primary composite outcome occurred in 5.62% of LH patients compared to 6.65% of VH patients (relative risk (RR) 0.845, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.753 - 0.947, p = 0.004). In addition, the risk of both transfusion and readmission was higher among patients who underwent VH compared to LH (transfusion: RR 1.372, 95% CI 1.078 - 1.745, p =0.010; readmission: RR 1.546, 95% CI 1.216 - 1.966, p = 0.001).

Conclusion: We have found that there is a lower 30-day composite morbidity for patients when undergoing LH compared to VH. These data demonstrate a higher risk of perioperative complications in women undergoing VH and should further inform surgeon's surgical considerations when deciding the optimal route of hysterectomy, depending on the expertise of the surgeon.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
期刊最新文献
Endometriosis influencers on Instagram: Who are they and what are they posting? Transforming the #Enzian classification into a four-stage system: A feasibility study by comparison with the 2021 AAGL endometriosis classification. The Beginning of a Paradigm Shift: Increase in Perioperative Complications Following Vaginal Hysterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Using the ACS-NSQIP 2016 - 2019 Database. Editorial Board Vaginoscopic Resection of an Obstructed Right Hemivagina in Obstructed Hemivagina and Ipsilateral Renal Agenesis Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1