Patient-Rated Acceptability of Automatic Palliative Care Referral: A Prospective Cohort Study

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of pain and symptom management Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.01.021
Seema King MSc, MSW , Aynharan Sinnarajah MD, MPH , Sadia Ahmed MSc , Alessandra Paolucci BA , Lisa Shirt RN, MN , Vanessa Slobogian RN, MN , Chandra Vig BN , Desiree Hao MD , Lisa C. Barbera MD, MPA , Elizabeth C. Kurien MD , Maria J. Santana MPharm, PhD , Aliyah Pabani MD , Patricia D. Biondo PhD , Jessica E. Simon MB, ChB
{"title":"Patient-Rated Acceptability of Automatic Palliative Care Referral: A Prospective Cohort Study","authors":"Seema King MSc, MSW ,&nbsp;Aynharan Sinnarajah MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Sadia Ahmed MSc ,&nbsp;Alessandra Paolucci BA ,&nbsp;Lisa Shirt RN, MN ,&nbsp;Vanessa Slobogian RN, MN ,&nbsp;Chandra Vig BN ,&nbsp;Desiree Hao MD ,&nbsp;Lisa C. Barbera MD, MPA ,&nbsp;Elizabeth C. Kurien MD ,&nbsp;Maria J. Santana MPharm, PhD ,&nbsp;Aliyah Pabani MD ,&nbsp;Patricia D. Biondo PhD ,&nbsp;Jessica E. Simon MB, ChB","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Timely palliative care can alleviate distress after diagnosis of an incurable cancer. However, late referrals to palliative care continue, reflecting various provider and patient barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine patient/caregiver-reported acceptability of a phone call offering a supportive and palliative care (SPC) consultation without requiring oncologist referral.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two SPC nurses screened out-patient clinic lists at a tertiary cancer center weekly and called all eligible patients to offer an SPC consultation. Eligibility: &gt;18 years, newly diagnosed/suspected stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer, and completed first oncologist visit. Patients/caregivers were surveyed about the acceptability of the phone call offering SPC consultation, using Sekhon's Framework of Acceptability domains.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 113 patients screened, 81 patients/caregivers were contacted and offered an SPC consultation; 72% accepted the consultation. Of 48 patients/caregivers surveyed, 94% rated overall acceptability of the call somewhat/completely acceptable; 6% rated it neither acceptable nor unacceptable. Within specific acceptability domains, 95% were comfortable receiving the call; 92% understood why they received the call; 87% found the call valuable; 70% found the call helpful; 66% learned about SPC from the call; no one expressed concern that the SPC nurse had access to their contact/health information; 97% thought the call required little physical/emotional effort and were confident in their ability to participate (i.e., to ask questions/make decisions).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These unsolicited phone calls offering SPC consultation were highly acceptable to patients/caregivers, and most agreed to the consultation. Implementing routine calls offering SPC consultation may be a timely alternative to awaiting conventional oncologist referral.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"69 5","pages":"Pages 465-472"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392425000417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Timely palliative care can alleviate distress after diagnosis of an incurable cancer. However, late referrals to palliative care continue, reflecting various provider and patient barriers.

Objectives

To determine patient/caregiver-reported acceptability of a phone call offering a supportive and palliative care (SPC) consultation without requiring oncologist referral.

Methods

Two SPC nurses screened out-patient clinic lists at a tertiary cancer center weekly and called all eligible patients to offer an SPC consultation. Eligibility: >18 years, newly diagnosed/suspected stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer, and completed first oncologist visit. Patients/caregivers were surveyed about the acceptability of the phone call offering SPC consultation, using Sekhon's Framework of Acceptability domains.

Results

Among 113 patients screened, 81 patients/caregivers were contacted and offered an SPC consultation; 72% accepted the consultation. Of 48 patients/caregivers surveyed, 94% rated overall acceptability of the call somewhat/completely acceptable; 6% rated it neither acceptable nor unacceptable. Within specific acceptability domains, 95% were comfortable receiving the call; 92% understood why they received the call; 87% found the call valuable; 70% found the call helpful; 66% learned about SPC from the call; no one expressed concern that the SPC nurse had access to their contact/health information; 97% thought the call required little physical/emotional effort and were confident in their ability to participate (i.e., to ask questions/make decisions).

Conclusion

These unsolicited phone calls offering SPC consultation were highly acceptable to patients/caregivers, and most agreed to the consultation. Implementing routine calls offering SPC consultation may be a timely alternative to awaiting conventional oncologist referral.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动姑息治疗转诊的患者评价接受度:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:及时的姑息治疗可以减轻诊断出无法治愈的癌症后的痛苦。然而,晚期转诊到姑息治疗继续,反映了各种提供者和患者的障碍。目的:确定患者/护理人员报告的电话可接受性,提供支持和姑息治疗(SPC)咨询,而不需要肿瘤学家转诊。方法:两名SPC护士每周筛选三级肿瘤中心门诊名单,并致电所有符合条件的患者进行SPC会诊。资格:>18岁,新诊断/疑似IV期非小细胞肺癌,完成首次肿瘤科就诊。使用Sekhon的可接受域框架,对提供SPC咨询的电话的可接受性进行了患者/护理人员调查。结果:在筛选的113例患者中,我们联系了81例患者/护理人员并提供了SPC咨询;72%的人接受了咨询。在接受调查的48名患者/护理人员中,94%的人认为电话的总体可接受性有些或完全可以接受;6%的人认为既不能接受也不能接受。在特定的可接受范围内,95%的人愿意接听电话;92%的人明白他们为什么会接到电话;87%的人认为这通电话有价值;70%的人认为电话有帮助;66%的人通过电话了解了SPC;没有人对SPC护士获得他们的联系方式/健康信息表示关切;97%的人认为电话几乎不需要身体/情感上的努力,并且对自己的参与能力(即提出问题/做出决定)充满信心。结论:患者/护理人员对主动电话进行SPC咨询的接受程度较高,多数患者同意进行SPC咨询。实施常规电话提供SPC咨询可能是等待传统肿瘤学家转诊的及时选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
期刊最新文献
Temporary Steroid Magic. Pain and Fatigue Interrelations in Terminally Ill Inpatients: A PCOC-Based Analysis. Palliative Care in Low and Middle-Income Countries to Reduce Cancer Suffering: A Systematic Review. Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Breathlessness in Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Interdisciplinary US Hospice Clinician Presence Throughout the Medical Aid in Dying Procedure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1