Patient-rated acceptability of automatic palliative care referral: a prospective cohort study.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of pain and symptom management Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.01.021
Seema King, Aynharan Sinnarajah, Sadia Ahmed, Alessandra Paolucci, Lisa Shirt, Vanessa Slobogian, Chandra Vig, Desiree Hao, Lisa C Barbera, Elizabeth C Kurien, Maria J Santana, Aliyah Pabani, Patricia D Biondo, Jessica E Simon
{"title":"Patient-rated acceptability of automatic palliative care referral: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Seema King, Aynharan Sinnarajah, Sadia Ahmed, Alessandra Paolucci, Lisa Shirt, Vanessa Slobogian, Chandra Vig, Desiree Hao, Lisa C Barbera, Elizabeth C Kurien, Maria J Santana, Aliyah Pabani, Patricia D Biondo, Jessica E Simon","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Timely palliative care can alleviate distress after diagnosis of an incurable cancer. However, late referrals to palliative care continue, reflecting various provider and patient barriers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine patient/caregiver-reported acceptability of a phone call offering a supportive and palliative care (SPC) consultation without requiring oncologist referral.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two SPC nurses screened out-patient clinic lists at a tertiary cancer center weekly and called all eligible patients to offer a SPC consultation. Eligibility: >18 years, newly diagnosed/suspected stage IV non-small cell lung cancer and completed first oncologist visit. Patients/caregivers were surveyed about the acceptability of the phone call offering SPC consultation, using Sekhon's Framework of Acceptability domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 113 patients screened, 81 patients/caregivers were contacted and offered a SPC consultation; 72% accepted the consultation. Of 48 patients/caregivers surveyed, 94% rated overall acceptability of the call somewhat/completely acceptable; 6% rated it neither acceptable nor unacceptable. Within specific acceptability domains, 95% were comfortable receiving the call; 92% understood why they received the call; 87% found the call valuable; 70% found the call helpful; 66% learned about SPC from the call; no one expressed concern that the SPC nurse had access to their contact/health information; 97% thought the call required little physical/emotional effort and were confident in their ability to participate (i.e., to ask questions/make decisions).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These unsolicited phone calls offering SPC consultation were highly acceptable to patients/caregivers, and most agreed to the consultation. Implementing routine calls offering SPC consultation may be a timely alternative to awaiting conventional oncologist referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.01.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Timely palliative care can alleviate distress after diagnosis of an incurable cancer. However, late referrals to palliative care continue, reflecting various provider and patient barriers.

Objective: To determine patient/caregiver-reported acceptability of a phone call offering a supportive and palliative care (SPC) consultation without requiring oncologist referral.

Methods: Two SPC nurses screened out-patient clinic lists at a tertiary cancer center weekly and called all eligible patients to offer a SPC consultation. Eligibility: >18 years, newly diagnosed/suspected stage IV non-small cell lung cancer and completed first oncologist visit. Patients/caregivers were surveyed about the acceptability of the phone call offering SPC consultation, using Sekhon's Framework of Acceptability domains.

Results: Among 113 patients screened, 81 patients/caregivers were contacted and offered a SPC consultation; 72% accepted the consultation. Of 48 patients/caregivers surveyed, 94% rated overall acceptability of the call somewhat/completely acceptable; 6% rated it neither acceptable nor unacceptable. Within specific acceptability domains, 95% were comfortable receiving the call; 92% understood why they received the call; 87% found the call valuable; 70% found the call helpful; 66% learned about SPC from the call; no one expressed concern that the SPC nurse had access to their contact/health information; 97% thought the call required little physical/emotional effort and were confident in their ability to participate (i.e., to ask questions/make decisions).

Conclusion: These unsolicited phone calls offering SPC consultation were highly acceptable to patients/caregivers, and most agreed to the consultation. Implementing routine calls offering SPC consultation may be a timely alternative to awaiting conventional oncologist referral.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
期刊最新文献
Fertility in the Face of Farewells: A Palliative Care Provider's Journey. Uncovering Structurally Differential Care: Pediatric Oncology Nurses' Perspectives Caring for African American Families. Table of Contents Editorial Board Patient-rated acceptability of automatic palliative care referral: a prospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1