Assessment of needle bending and tracking requirements for optimized needle placement in combined intracavitary/interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1007/s00066-025-02367-2
Andre Karius, Vratislav Strnad, Michael Lotter, Stephan Kreppner, Ricarda Merten, Rainer Fietkau, Christoph Bert, Claudia Schweizer
{"title":"Assessment of needle bending and tracking requirements for optimized needle placement in combined intracavitary/interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy.","authors":"Andre Karius, Vratislav Strnad, Michael Lotter, Stephan Kreppner, Ricarda Merten, Rainer Fietkau, Christoph Bert, Claudia Schweizer","doi":"10.1007/s00066-025-02367-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Needle tracking using external prediction techniques such as optical tracking is a modern approach aimed at improving implantation accuracy in gynecologic brachytherapy. This study aims to investigate the corresponding impact of needle bending in situ and to analyze needle path deviations from the intended locations occurring in our current clinical workflow that only considers ultrasound imaging without tracking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a semi-automated approach for reconstructing brachytherapy needles based on planning CTs and compared the respective accuracy to the also determined intra-observer variability of manual reconstructions. Based on this, we measured needle bending in situ for 89 patients and calculated the Euclidean distances between actual needle tips and needle tip predictions both longitudinally and laterally to the insertion direction. Furthermore, we compared actual and intended spacings between inserted needles to estimate implantation uncertainties with respect to our current clinical workflow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our developed reconstruction featured an accuracy of 0.17 ± 0.08 mm, which was improved compared to the intra-observer variability of 0.21 ± 0.11 mm. Needle bending depended strongly on needle length and ranged from 3.6 ± 2.1 mm for 100-120 mm needles up to 7.9 ± 3.0 mm for 200-220 mm needles. Deflections in the transverse direction were substantially higher than tip deviations in the longitudinal direction. Furthermore, we found deviations from an equidistant spacing between needle paths of 1.4 ± 1.2 mm in the transverse direction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inserting brachytherapy needles can be substantially affected by transverse needle bending in situ, which should therefore be corrected for in prediction approaches such as optical tracking.</p>","PeriodicalId":21998,"journal":{"name":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","volume":" ","pages":"40-51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12819550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-025-02367-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Needle tracking using external prediction techniques such as optical tracking is a modern approach aimed at improving implantation accuracy in gynecologic brachytherapy. This study aims to investigate the corresponding impact of needle bending in situ and to analyze needle path deviations from the intended locations occurring in our current clinical workflow that only considers ultrasound imaging without tracking.

Methods: We developed a semi-automated approach for reconstructing brachytherapy needles based on planning CTs and compared the respective accuracy to the also determined intra-observer variability of manual reconstructions. Based on this, we measured needle bending in situ for 89 patients and calculated the Euclidean distances between actual needle tips and needle tip predictions both longitudinally and laterally to the insertion direction. Furthermore, we compared actual and intended spacings between inserted needles to estimate implantation uncertainties with respect to our current clinical workflow.

Results: Our developed reconstruction featured an accuracy of 0.17 ± 0.08 mm, which was improved compared to the intra-observer variability of 0.21 ± 0.11 mm. Needle bending depended strongly on needle length and ranged from 3.6 ± 2.1 mm for 100-120 mm needles up to 7.9 ± 3.0 mm for 200-220 mm needles. Deflections in the transverse direction were substantially higher than tip deviations in the longitudinal direction. Furthermore, we found deviations from an equidistant spacing between needle paths of 1.4 ± 1.2 mm in the transverse direction.

Conclusion: Inserting brachytherapy needles can be substantially affected by transverse needle bending in situ, which should therefore be corrected for in prediction approaches such as optical tracking.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腔内/间质联合妇科近距离治疗中优化置针的弯针和跟踪要求评估。
目的:利用光学跟踪等外部预测技术进行针头跟踪是提高妇科近距离治疗植入精度的一种现代方法。本研究旨在探讨原位针弯的相应影响,并分析当前临床工作流程中仅考虑超声成像而不考虑跟踪的针径偏离预期位置的情况。方法:我们开发了一种基于计划ct的半自动重建近距离治疗针头的方法,并将各自的准确性与人工重建的观察者内变异性进行了比较。在此基础上,我们测量了89例患者的原位针弯,并计算了实际针尖与预测针尖在插入方向纵向和横向上的欧氏距离。此外,我们比较了插入针头之间的实际和预期间距,以估计我们当前临床工作流程中的植入不确定性。结果:我们开发的重建精度为0.17 ±0.08 mm,与0.21 ±0.11 mm的观察者内部变异性相比有所提高。针的弯曲程度与针的长度密切相关,从100-120 mm针的3.6 ±2.1 mm到200-220 mm针的7.9 ±3.0 mm。横向偏转明显高于纵向偏转。此外,我们发现在横向方向上,针径之间的等距距离偏差为1.4 ±1.2 mm。结论:近距离治疗针头的插入会受到原位横向弯曲的严重影响,因此在光学跟踪等预测方法中应加以纠正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.90%
发文量
141
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, published monthly, is a scientific journal that covers all aspects of oncology with focus on radiooncology, radiation biology and radiation physics. The articles are not only of interest to radiooncologists but to all physicians interested in oncology, to radiation biologists and radiation physicists. The journal publishes original articles, review articles and case studies that are peer-reviewed. It includes scientific short communications as well as a literature review with annotated articles that inform the reader on new developments in the various disciplines concerned and hence allow for a sound overview on the latest results in radiooncology research. Founded in 1912, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the oldest oncological journal in the world. Today, contributions are published in English and German. All articles have English summaries and legends. The journal is the official publication of several scientific radiooncological societies and publishes the relevant communications of these societies.
期刊最新文献
29th Annual SASRO Meeting 2025. [Cystectomy plus perioperative enfortumab vedotin/pembrolizumab in bladder cancer]. Impact of reduced interval from simulation CT to treatment delivery on dosimetric and positioning accuracy for total marrow lymph-node irradiation. Accelerated vs. conventionally fractionated postoperative radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer-final results of the prematurely terminated PORTAF trial. Assessing the quality of radiation oncology education in four German medical schools: a student perspective and comparison with DEGRO recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1