Trends in Urology Residency Applications: Results from The American Urological Association Medical Student Survey from 2022 to 2024.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2025.01.075
Michael Creswell, Kirsten Greene, Lee Richstone, Simone Thavaseelan, Erica Traxel, Aaron Tverye, Casey Kowalik, Gina Badalato, Thomas Jarrett, Kate Kraft, Mathew Sorensen, Moben Mirza
{"title":"Trends in Urology Residency Applications: Results from The American Urological Association Medical Student Survey from 2022 to 2024.","authors":"Michael Creswell, Kirsten Greene, Lee Richstone, Simone Thavaseelan, Erica Traxel, Aaron Tverye, Casey Kowalik, Gina Badalato, Thomas Jarrett, Kate Kraft, Mathew Sorensen, Moben Mirza","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.01.075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide a comprehensive overview of the American Urological Association (AUA) Medical Student Surveys and includes data 2022, 2023 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collected through surveys distributed prior to match day and were distributed to all medical students who submitted a rank list for urology residency. Questions consisted of various topics including applicant demographics, application metrics, and experiences with preference signals and virtual interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>440 (79%), 428 (84%), and 387 (77%) applicants participated in surveys for the years 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively. Applicants continue to participate in research at a high level. Additionally, USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores gained prominence following the transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail. Preference signals were well-received, and large volume signaling may have prompted applicants to apply to fewer programs. Virtual interviews were favored for cost-effectiveness and perceived equity benefits, however, applicants expressed a preference for in-person interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There have been dynamic shifts in urology residency applications from the applicant perspective from 2022 to 2024. This may be influenced by changing evaluation metrics as well as the adoption of preference signals and virtual interviews. The findings highlight the need for ongoing feedback and transparency to ensure equitable practices for both applicants and residency programs during this evolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.01.075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To provide a comprehensive overview of the American Urological Association (AUA) Medical Student Surveys and includes data 2022, 2023 and 2024.

Methods: Data collected through surveys distributed prior to match day and were distributed to all medical students who submitted a rank list for urology residency. Questions consisted of various topics including applicant demographics, application metrics, and experiences with preference signals and virtual interviews.

Results: 440 (79%), 428 (84%), and 387 (77%) applicants participated in surveys for the years 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively. Applicants continue to participate in research at a high level. Additionally, USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores gained prominence following the transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail. Preference signals were well-received, and large volume signaling may have prompted applicants to apply to fewer programs. Virtual interviews were favored for cost-effectiveness and perceived equity benefits, however, applicants expressed a preference for in-person interactions.

Conclusions: There have been dynamic shifts in urology residency applications from the applicant perspective from 2022 to 2024. This may be influenced by changing evaluation metrics as well as the adoption of preference signals and virtual interviews. The findings highlight the need for ongoing feedback and transparency to ensure equitable practices for both applicants and residency programs during this evolution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology
Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.
期刊最新文献
The Efficacy of the TAIPEI (TAping Inbetween PEnile Incisions) Technique for Correcting Penile Curvature in Stage Flap Repair. Editorial Comment on "Clinical Predictors of Micro-TESE Success in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia with Complete AZFc Microdeletion". Editorial Comment on "Impact of Planned Research Gap Year on Urology Residency Match Success". Editorial comment on "Transperineal MRI-fusion targeted prostate biopsy utilizing the PrecisionPoint® Transperineal Access System versus a grid template: An assessment of outcomes". Reply to Editorial Comment on "Routine Sperm Cryopreservation before Vasectomy Is Not Cost-Effective and Does Not Increase Live Birth Rates Compared to Surgical Sperm Retrieval or Vasectomy Reversal".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1