Comparison of Wedge Resection and Anatomical Lung Resection in Elderly Patients With Early-Stage Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer With Visceral Pleural Invasion: A Population-Based Study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Thoracic Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1111/1759-7714.15532
Shuyuan Li, Yong Ge, Ran Ma, Jiayi Wang, Tianyue Ma, Teng Sun, Shoujie Feng, Cheng Zhang, Hao Zhang
{"title":"Comparison of Wedge Resection and Anatomical Lung Resection in Elderly Patients With Early-Stage Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer With Visceral Pleural Invasion: A Population-Based Study.","authors":"Shuyuan Li, Yong Ge, Ran Ma, Jiayi Wang, Tianyue Ma, Teng Sun, Shoujie Feng, Cheng Zhang, Hao Zhang","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.15532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the global population ages, the prevalence of early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among octogenarians is rising. This demographic frequently presents with comorbid conditions, diminished cardiopulmonary function, and increased frailty, which elevate the risks associated with standard treatments. While lobectomy combined with lymph node dissection is still considered the gold standard for managing NSCLC, octogenarians are at significantly higher risk of perioperative mortality. Although wedge resection has been suggested as a less invasive option, previous research has insufficiently explored the influence of visceral pleural invasion (VPI) on postoperative outcomes. This study seeks to evaluate whether wedge resection can provide survival outcomes equivalent to those of anatomical resection in this high-risk population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis using SEER data from 2010 to 2019, focusing on octogenarians diagnosed with stage I NSCLC and VPI. Propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank testing, and Cox multivariate regression were employed to evaluate and compare the outcomes associated with two different surgical techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 523 octogenarians with stage I NSCLC and VPI, from a cohort of 1587 patients. In this study cohort, 372 (71.1%) patients received anatomical resection, while 151 (28.9%) patients underwent wedge resection. Following multivariable adjustment and propensity score matching, there were no statistically significant differences in lung cancer-specific survival (CSS; HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.57-1.73) or overall survival (OS; HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.68-1.53) observed between the two surgical groups. Additionally, multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the choice of surgical approach was not an independent prognostic factor for either CSS (HR 1.29, 95% CI: 0.62-2.69) or OS (HR 1.50, 95% CI: 0.68-1.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that wedge resection is a viable surgical option for octogenarians with stage I NSCLC and VPI. Notably, the addition of lymph node dissection to wedge resection significantly enhances survival outcomes compared to wedge resection performed without lymph node dissection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 3","pages":"e15532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11802184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15532","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the global population ages, the prevalence of early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among octogenarians is rising. This demographic frequently presents with comorbid conditions, diminished cardiopulmonary function, and increased frailty, which elevate the risks associated with standard treatments. While lobectomy combined with lymph node dissection is still considered the gold standard for managing NSCLC, octogenarians are at significantly higher risk of perioperative mortality. Although wedge resection has been suggested as a less invasive option, previous research has insufficiently explored the influence of visceral pleural invasion (VPI) on postoperative outcomes. This study seeks to evaluate whether wedge resection can provide survival outcomes equivalent to those of anatomical resection in this high-risk population.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using SEER data from 2010 to 2019, focusing on octogenarians diagnosed with stage I NSCLC and VPI. Propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank testing, and Cox multivariate regression were employed to evaluate and compare the outcomes associated with two different surgical techniques.

Results: We identified 523 octogenarians with stage I NSCLC and VPI, from a cohort of 1587 patients. In this study cohort, 372 (71.1%) patients received anatomical resection, while 151 (28.9%) patients underwent wedge resection. Following multivariable adjustment and propensity score matching, there were no statistically significant differences in lung cancer-specific survival (CSS; HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.57-1.73) or overall survival (OS; HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.68-1.53) observed between the two surgical groups. Additionally, multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the choice of surgical approach was not an independent prognostic factor for either CSS (HR 1.29, 95% CI: 0.62-2.69) or OS (HR 1.50, 95% CI: 0.68-1.62).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that wedge resection is a viable surgical option for octogenarians with stage I NSCLC and VPI. Notably, the addition of lymph node dissection to wedge resection significantly enhances survival outcomes compared to wedge resection performed without lymph node dissection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thoracic Cancer
Thoracic Cancer ONCOLOGY-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
439
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society. The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.
期刊最新文献
ACT001 Suppresses the Malignant Progression of Small-Cell Lung Cancer by Inhibiting Lactate Production and Promoting Anti-Tumor Immunity. EGFR, TP53, and CUL3 Triple Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and its Potentially Poor Prognosis: A Case Report and Database Analysis. The Impact of Immune-Related Adverse Event Severity on Prognosis in Elderly Patients With Nonsmall-Cell Lung Cancer in First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment. Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Oral Etoposide Combined With Capecitabine for Patients With Postoperative Metastatic Breast Cancer Resistant to Anthracycline/Taxanes. Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment and Outcomes: A Single Institution Retrospective Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1