[Artículo traducido] Valoración farmacoterapéutica y reacciones adversas a medicamentos en pacientes ancianos ingresados en cuidados intensivos

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.farma.2024.10.009
Fabiana Angelo Marques Carizio , Isabella do Vale de Souza , Alan Maicon de Oliveira , Maria Madalena Corrêa Melo , Maria Olívia Barbosa Zanetti , Fabiana Rossi Varallo , Leonardo Régis Leira-Pereira
{"title":"[Artículo traducido] Valoración farmacoterapéutica y reacciones adversas a medicamentos en pacientes ancianos ingresados en cuidados intensivos","authors":"Fabiana Angelo Marques Carizio ,&nbsp;Isabella do Vale de Souza ,&nbsp;Alan Maicon de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Maria Madalena Corrêa Melo ,&nbsp;Maria Olívia Barbosa Zanetti ,&nbsp;Fabiana Rossi Varallo ,&nbsp;Leonardo Régis Leira-Pereira","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Older patients are more susceptible to medication use, and physiological changes resulting from aging and organic dysfunctions presented by critically-ill patients may alter the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic behavior. Thus, critically-ill older people present greater vulnerability to the occurrence of pharmacotherapeutic problems.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate pharmacotherapy and the development of potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in older patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A cohort study was conducted in an ICU for adults of a Brazilian University Hospital during a 12-month period. The patients' pharmacotherapy was evaluated daily, considering the occurrence of ADRs and drug–drug interactions (DDIs), the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for older people, and the pharmacotherapy anticholinergic burden (ACB). A trigger tool was used for active search of ADRs, with subsequent causality evaluation. PIM use was evaluated by means of the Beers criteria and the STOPP/START criteria. The ABC scale was employed to estimate ACB. The Micromedex® and <span><span>Drugs.com</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>® medication databases were employed to evaluate the DDIs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample of this study consisted of 41 patients, with a mean age of 66.8 years old (±<!--> <!-->5.2). The 22 triggers used assisted in identifying 15 potential ADRs, and 26.8% of the patients developed them. The mean estimated ACB score was 3.0 (±<!--> <!-->1.8), and the patients used 3.1 (±<!--> <!-->1.4) and 3.3 (±<!--> <!-->1.6) PIMs according to the Beers and the STOPP criteria, respectively. A total of 672 DDIs were identified, with a mean of 16.8 (±<!--> <!-->9.5) DDIs/patient during ICU hospitalization. Our findings show an association between occurrence of ADRs in the ICU and polypharmacy (<em>p</em> = 0.03) and DDIs (<em>p</em> = 0.007), corroborating efforts for rational medication use as a preventive strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Using tools to evaluate the pharmacotherapy for older people in intensive care can assist in the recognition and prevention of pharmacotherapeutic problems, with emphasis on the identification of ADRs through the observation of triggers and subsequent causality analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":"49 3","pages":"Pages T148-T153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130634324001697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Older patients are more susceptible to medication use, and physiological changes resulting from aging and organic dysfunctions presented by critically-ill patients may alter the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic behavior. Thus, critically-ill older people present greater vulnerability to the occurrence of pharmacotherapeutic problems.

Objective

To evaluate pharmacotherapy and the development of potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in older patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU).

Method

A cohort study was conducted in an ICU for adults of a Brazilian University Hospital during a 12-month period. The patients' pharmacotherapy was evaluated daily, considering the occurrence of ADRs and drug–drug interactions (DDIs), the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for older people, and the pharmacotherapy anticholinergic burden (ACB). A trigger tool was used for active search of ADRs, with subsequent causality evaluation. PIM use was evaluated by means of the Beers criteria and the STOPP/START criteria. The ABC scale was employed to estimate ACB. The Micromedex® and Drugs.com® medication databases were employed to evaluate the DDIs.

Results

The sample of this study consisted of 41 patients, with a mean age of 66.8 years old (± 5.2). The 22 triggers used assisted in identifying 15 potential ADRs, and 26.8% of the patients developed them. The mean estimated ACB score was 3.0 (± 1.8), and the patients used 3.1 (± 1.4) and 3.3 (± 1.6) PIMs according to the Beers and the STOPP criteria, respectively. A total of 672 DDIs were identified, with a mean of 16.8 (± 9.5) DDIs/patient during ICU hospitalization. Our findings show an association between occurrence of ADRs in the ICU and polypharmacy (p = 0.03) and DDIs (p = 0.007), corroborating efforts for rational medication use as a preventive strategy.

Conclusions

Using tools to evaluate the pharmacotherapy for older people in intensive care can assist in the recognition and prevention of pharmacotherapeutic problems, with emphasis on the identification of ADRs through the observation of triggers and subsequent causality analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年重症监护患者的药物治疗评估和药物不良反应。
老年患者更易用药,危重患者因衰老和器质性功能障碍引起的生理变化可能改变药代动力学或药效学行为。因此,危重老年人更容易出现药物治疗问题。目的:评价重症监护病房(ICU)老年患者的药物治疗及潜在药物不良反应(adr)的发生情况。方法:在巴西某大学医院的成人ICU进行了一项为期12个月的队列研究。每天对患者的药物治疗进行评估,考虑不良反应和药物相互作用(ddi)的发生,老年人潜在不适当药物(PIMs)的使用以及药物治疗抗胆碱能负担(ACB)。使用触发工具主动搜索不良反应,随后进行因果关系评估。PIM的使用通过Beers标准和STOPP/START标准进行评估。采用ABC量表评估ACB。使用Micromedex®和Drugs.com®药物数据库评估ddi。结果:本研究样本包括41例患者,平均年龄66.8 岁(±5.2岁)。使用的22个触发器有助于识别15个潜在的adr, 26.8%的患者发生了adr。平均ACB评分为3.0(±1.8)分,患者分别按照Beers和STOPP标准使用3.1(±1.4)和3.3(±1.6)个pim。共发现672例ddi,在ICU住院期间平均16.8(±9.5)例ddi /患者。我们的研究结果显示,ICU中adr的发生与多种用药(p = 0.03)和ddi (p = 0.007)之间存在关联,证实了将合理用药作为预防策略的努力。结论:使用工具对重症监护老年人的药物治疗进行评估有助于识别和预防药物治疗问题,重点是通过观察触发因素和随后的因果关系分析来识别药物不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
期刊最新文献
Use of milrinone in the treatment of cerebral vasospasm secondary to aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A narrative review. Reply to comments on the PSICU-ALTA protocol: first steps toward improving psychotropic prescribing after ICU discharge. Anticholinergic burden and its relationship with cognitive impairment in a neuropsychiatric unit. Dosing interval optimization and persistence with faricimab in age-related macular degeneration: An observational study in real-world clinical practice. Generational priorities, motivations, concerns, and expectations of hospital pharmacists in Spain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1