Effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment on pain in palliative care patients: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.

IF 3.1 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Pain Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001239
Yann Galeazzi, Nicolas Houel, Léa Gouaux, Anne Rohan, Hélène Le Heiget, Camille Jung, Bruno Housset, Laurent Stubbe
{"title":"Effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment on pain in palliative care patients: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Yann Galeazzi, Nicolas Houel, Léa Gouaux, Anne Rohan, Hélène Le Heiget, Camille Jung, Bruno Housset, Laurent Stubbe","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Standard osteopathic manipulative therapy (OMT) is used as a supportive care for pain management in cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of OMT with that of a sham treatment to attenuate pain in cancer patients in a palliative care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was a simple blind, monocentric, placebo-controlled study. Seventy-five patients were randomly distributed between standard and sham OMT sessions at a 1:1 ratio, receiving standard or sham treatment every 2 days for the 7 days of the study. Patients were assessed using a self-administered visual analog scale (VAS)-ranging from 0 to 100, recorded in the morning and evening. They also completed the QLQ-C15-PAL quality-of-life questionnaire on the first and last day of the study. For participants with controlled analgesia pumps, the number of analgesic doses was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The OMT group demonstrated a significant effect of days, circadian period, and group on VAS pain decrease (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The VAS pain score for the OMT group exhibited a notable decline from the third day (D3 pm) (<i>P</i> = 0.03) to D6 pm (<i>P</i> = 1.28 × 10<sup>-05</sup>) with 43.2% improvement by the conclusion of the study. On D6, the quality-of-life score exhibited a tendency towards improvement. Patients with analgesia pumps showed a 31.58% reduction in their demand for analgesics (<i>P</i> = 0.016). No significant results were observed between D0 and D3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is hypothesized that OMT could prove an efficacious method of pain management in cancer patients receiving palliative care, in addition to conventional cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"10 2","pages":"e1239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Standard osteopathic manipulative therapy (OMT) is used as a supportive care for pain management in cancer patients.

Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of OMT with that of a sham treatment to attenuate pain in cancer patients in a palliative care unit.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial was a simple blind, monocentric, placebo-controlled study. Seventy-five patients were randomly distributed between standard and sham OMT sessions at a 1:1 ratio, receiving standard or sham treatment every 2 days for the 7 days of the study. Patients were assessed using a self-administered visual analog scale (VAS)-ranging from 0 to 100, recorded in the morning and evening. They also completed the QLQ-C15-PAL quality-of-life questionnaire on the first and last day of the study. For participants with controlled analgesia pumps, the number of analgesic doses was recorded.

Results: The OMT group demonstrated a significant effect of days, circadian period, and group on VAS pain decrease (P < 0.05). The VAS pain score for the OMT group exhibited a notable decline from the third day (D3 pm) (P = 0.03) to D6 pm (P = 1.28 × 10-05) with 43.2% improvement by the conclusion of the study. On D6, the quality-of-life score exhibited a tendency towards improvement. Patients with analgesia pumps showed a 31.58% reduction in their demand for analgesics (P = 0.016). No significant results were observed between D0 and D3.

Conclusion: It is hypothesized that OMT could prove an efficacious method of pain management in cancer patients receiving palliative care, in addition to conventional cancer treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨疗手法治疗对姑息治疗患者疼痛的影响:一项随机安慰剂对照临床试验。
标准整骨疗法(OMT)被用作癌症患者疼痛管理的支持性护理。目的:本研究旨在比较OMT与假治疗的疗效,以减轻姑息治疗单位癌症患者的疼痛。方法:本随机临床试验为单盲、单中心、安慰剂对照研究。75名患者按1:1的比例随机分布在标准和假OMT疗程之间,在7天的研究中每2天接受一次标准或假治疗。患者使用自我管理的视觉模拟评分(VAS)进行评估,评分范围从0到100,分别在早上和晚上记录。他们还在研究的第一天和最后一天完成了QLQ-C15-PAL生活质量问卷。对于使用控制镇痛泵的参与者,记录镇痛剂量的数量。结果:OMT组对VAS疼痛的减轻有明显的天数、昼夜周期和组间差异(P < 0.05)。OMT组VAS疼痛评分从第3天(D3 pm)到第6天(P = 1.28 × 10-05)显著下降(P = 0.03),改善43.2%。在第6天,生活质量得分呈现出改善的趋势。使用镇痛泵的患者对镇痛药的需求减少了31.58% (P = 0.016)。D0与D3之间无明显差异。结论:假设除了常规的癌症治疗外,OMT可能是接受姑息治疗的癌症患者疼痛管理的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Chronic pain is associated with disability: results from a large, population-based survey in South Africa. High-impact chronic pain after total joint arthroplasty: a longitudinal cohort study. Sex-specific effects of naturally shorter sleep on experimental pain perception. Exploring real-world acute associations between physical activity and bodily pain in middle-aged and older adults. Pain in multiple sclerosis: clinical phenotypes and therapeutic strategies - a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1