Diabetes Medical Group Visits and Type 2 Diabetes Outcomes: Mediation Analysis of Diabetes Distress.

IF 2.6 Q2 Medicine JMIR Diabetes Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.2196/57526
Matthew Reichert, Barbara A De La Cruz, Paula Gardiner, Suzanne Mitchell
{"title":"Diabetes Medical Group Visits and Type 2 Diabetes Outcomes: Mediation Analysis of Diabetes Distress.","authors":"Matthew Reichert, Barbara A De La Cruz, Paula Gardiner, Suzanne Mitchell","doi":"10.2196/57526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Group-based diabetes care, both technology-enabled and in-person, can improve diabetes outcomes in low-income minority women, but the mechanism remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We tested whether diabetes group medical visits (GMVs) reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) by mitigating diabetes distress (DD), an emotional response affecting nearly half of adults with type 2 diabetes in community settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mediation and moderation analysis of data from the Women in Control 2.0 comparative effectiveness study, which showed that both technology-enabled and in-person diabetes GMVs improve HbA1c. We tested whether DD mediated the relationship between diabetes GMV engagement and reductions in HbA1c. We also tested whether this relationship was moderated by depressive symptoms and social support. Participants were 309 low-income and minority women. Diabetes GMV engagement was measured using the Group Climate Questionnaire. The mediator, DD, was measured using the Diabetes Distress Screening Scale. The outcome was the 6-month change in HbA1c. Social support was measured using the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DD mediated the relationship between engagement and 6-month HbA1c. Specifically, group engagement affected HbA1c by reducing distress associated with the regimen of diabetes self-management (P=.04), and possibly the emotional burden of diabetes (P=.09). The relationship between engagement and 6-month HbA1c was moderated by depressive symptoms (P=.02), and possibly social support (P=.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Engagement in diabetes GMVs improved HbA1c because it helped reduce diabetes-related distress, especially related to the regimen of diabetes management and possibly related to its emotional burden, and especially for women without depressive symptoms and possibly for women who lacked social support.</p>","PeriodicalId":52371,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Diabetes","volume":"10 ","pages":"e57526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/57526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Group-based diabetes care, both technology-enabled and in-person, can improve diabetes outcomes in low-income minority women, but the mechanism remains unclear.

Objective: We tested whether diabetes group medical visits (GMVs) reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) by mitigating diabetes distress (DD), an emotional response affecting nearly half of adults with type 2 diabetes in community settings.

Methods: We conducted a mediation and moderation analysis of data from the Women in Control 2.0 comparative effectiveness study, which showed that both technology-enabled and in-person diabetes GMVs improve HbA1c. We tested whether DD mediated the relationship between diabetes GMV engagement and reductions in HbA1c. We also tested whether this relationship was moderated by depressive symptoms and social support. Participants were 309 low-income and minority women. Diabetes GMV engagement was measured using the Group Climate Questionnaire. The mediator, DD, was measured using the Diabetes Distress Screening Scale. The outcome was the 6-month change in HbA1c. Social support was measured using the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey.

Results: DD mediated the relationship between engagement and 6-month HbA1c. Specifically, group engagement affected HbA1c by reducing distress associated with the regimen of diabetes self-management (P=.04), and possibly the emotional burden of diabetes (P=.09). The relationship between engagement and 6-month HbA1c was moderated by depressive symptoms (P=.02), and possibly social support (P=.08).

Conclusions: Engagement in diabetes GMVs improved HbA1c because it helped reduce diabetes-related distress, especially related to the regimen of diabetes management and possibly related to its emotional burden, and especially for women without depressive symptoms and possibly for women who lacked social support.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病医疗小组访问与2型糖尿病结局:糖尿病困扰的中介分析
背景:基于群体的糖尿病护理,无论是技术支持的还是面对面的,都可以改善低收入少数民族妇女的糖尿病结局,但其机制尚不清楚。目的:我们测试糖尿病组医疗就诊(gmv)是否通过减轻糖尿病困扰(DD)来降低血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c), DD是一种影响社区环境中近一半2型糖尿病成年人的情绪反应。方法:我们对对照女性2.0比较有效性研究的数据进行了中介和调节分析,结果表明技术支持和真人糖尿病gmv均可改善HbA1c。我们测试了DD是否介导糖尿病GMV参与和HbA1c降低之间的关系。我们还测试了这种关系是否被抑郁症状和社会支持所缓和。参与者是309名低收入和少数族裔妇女。糖尿病GMV参与使用群体气候问卷进行测量。调节因子DD采用糖尿病窘迫筛查量表进行测量。结果是6个月HbA1c的变化。社会支持使用医疗结果研究社会支持调查来测量。结果:DD在敬业度与6个月HbA1c之间起中介作用。具体而言,群体参与通过减少与糖尿病自我管理方案相关的痛苦(P= 0.04)以及可能的糖尿病情绪负担(P= 0.09)来影响HbA1c。敬业度与6个月HbA1c之间的关系被抑郁症状(P=.02)以及可能的社会支持(P=.08)所缓和。结论:参与糖尿病gmv改善了HbA1c,因为它有助于减少糖尿病相关的痛苦,特别是与糖尿病管理方案有关,可能与糖尿病的情绪负担有关,特别是对于没有抑郁症状的女性和可能缺乏社会支持的女性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Diabetes
JMIR Diabetes Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cardiorespiratory Markers of Type 2 Diabetes: Machine Learning-Based Analysis. Effectiveness, Reach, Uptake, and Feasibility of Digital Health Interventions for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations Living With Prediabetes Across the Lifespan: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Use of the GTT@home Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Kit in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Performance Evaluation Study. Predictors of Glycemic Response to Sulfonylurea Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Over 12 Months: Comparative Analysis of Linear Regression and Machine Learning Models. Content Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Diabetes Self-Management Support Tool for Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1