Understanding health care price variation: evidence from Transparency-in-Coverage data.

IF 2.7 Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf011
Christopher Whaley, Nandita Radhakrishnan, Michael Richards, Kosali Simon, Benjamin Chartock
{"title":"Understanding health care price variation: evidence from Transparency-in-Coverage data.","authors":"Christopher Whaley, Nandita Radhakrishnan, Michael Richards, Kosali Simon, Benjamin Chartock","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Competition in health care markets should lead to lower prices and less dispersion, with consumer choice as the driving mechanism. Several studies document price variation, suggesting room for improvement; however, they relied on selected data from insurers who provide access to data, limiting generalizability. We document the nature of price variation in the private US market across geography, payer, and provider by leveraging a new dataset, implementing a descriptive analysis using the most comprehensive data available: Transparency-in-Coverage. We measured health care prices in 3 ways: percentile distribution prices for common services, state-level and insurer-level facility fee price indices, and regression-adjusted mean inpatient and outpatient prices. Variation is large: the mean facility fee for a foot X-ray, for example, is $86 at Anthem and $190 at UnitedHealth. Pricing does not appear to be uniform; there is just 22% correlation between an insurer's inpatient price and outpatient facility price. And there is little difference in ordering of high-price states depending on alternative measures, such as relative to Medicare. Results suggest greater consideration of policies to address high and variable prices for US health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 2","pages":"qxaf011"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Competition in health care markets should lead to lower prices and less dispersion, with consumer choice as the driving mechanism. Several studies document price variation, suggesting room for improvement; however, they relied on selected data from insurers who provide access to data, limiting generalizability. We document the nature of price variation in the private US market across geography, payer, and provider by leveraging a new dataset, implementing a descriptive analysis using the most comprehensive data available: Transparency-in-Coverage. We measured health care prices in 3 ways: percentile distribution prices for common services, state-level and insurer-level facility fee price indices, and regression-adjusted mean inpatient and outpatient prices. Variation is large: the mean facility fee for a foot X-ray, for example, is $86 at Anthem and $190 at UnitedHealth. Pricing does not appear to be uniform; there is just 22% correlation between an insurer's inpatient price and outpatient facility price. And there is little difference in ordering of high-price states depending on alternative measures, such as relative to Medicare. Results suggest greater consideration of policies to address high and variable prices for US health care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解卫生保健价格变化:来自覆盖透明度数据的证据。
医疗保健市场的竞争应以消费者选择为驱动机制,导致价格降低和分散性降低。几项研究记录了价格变化,表明有改进的空间;然而,他们依赖于提供数据访问的保险公司的精选数据,限制了通用性。我们利用一个新的数据集,利用最全面的可用数据实施描述性分析,记录了美国私人市场跨地域、付款人和供应商的价格变化性质:覆盖透明度。我们用三种方式衡量医疗保健价格:共同服务的百分位数分布价格、州级和保险级设施费用价格指数,以及经回归调整的住院和门诊平均价格。差异很大:例如,安塞姆的足部x光检查平均费用为86美元,而联合健康(UnitedHealth)为190美元。定价似乎并不统一;保险公司的住院价格和门诊价格之间只有22%的相关性。而且,根据替代措施(比如相对于联邦医疗保险制度),对高药价州的排序也没有什么不同。结果表明,更多的考虑政策,以解决高和可变价格的美国医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of US government funding freezes on the HIV response: findings from a rapid survey in 32 countries. The timeliness of health plan drug coverage policy changes to FDA label revisions. Shared labor-Public Private Partnerships for Maternal Health Equity. State laws that address workplace violence in health care settings. Correction to: Insulin rationing in states with and without insulin copay caps: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1